Financial Navigation Study Among Young Adult Blood Cancer Survivors

November 18, 2024 updated by: Tufts Medical Center

Evaluating the Role of Financial Navigation in Alleviating Financial Distress Among Young Adult Survivors of Blood Cancer

Young adult cancer survivors (18-39y) are at increased risk of financial distress. This study seeks to better understand the financial challenges experienced by these individuals via quantitative serial assessments, study-based financial navigator encounters and an end of study qualitative interview.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This fully remote, multi-site study will evaluate the role of financial navigators in relieving financial distress in young adults (18-39y) who have completed treatment for blood cancer at least three years ago. Serial Assessments at study entry, 3-months, and 6-months measure financial distress measured using the study's primary outcome measure the Personal Financial Wellness Scale™ (PFW) (see below), hypothesized effect modifiers (emotional distress, self-efficacy, cognitive functioning), as well as care seeking, household finances and insurance characteristics. Randomization will occur following completion of baseline measures (see below for description of study arms). In addition to a formal evaluation of the intervention at 3- and 6-months, an optional interview will occur following the 6-month assessment/navigation intervention period to gain further insight from participants about the acceptability of the intervention. For ethical considerations related to the topic of study, all participants will be provided with the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's information specialist hotline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California (USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center & LA County Hospital)
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29607
        • Bon Secours Mercy Health System
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • MD Anderson

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous diagnosis and treatment of blood cancer (leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm)
  2. Current age between 18-39 years old
  3. Blood cancer diagnosis during childhood (0-17 years of age) or young adulthood (18-36 years of age)
  4. At least three years post blood cancer diagnosis
  5. Off treatment for blood cancer or on a long-term regimen with an oral anti-cancer medication with stable disease
  6. Off treatment for a second cancer (non-blood cancer) or on a stable long-term regimen, such as hormone therapy or hormone replacement therapy
  7. Primary residence in United States
  8. Able to understand and read the English language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On parent or guardian's insurance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Navigation
Active navigation with the study-based financial navigator scheduling four check-in meetings throughout the study with the participant. All participants will complete an assessment at baseline, 3 months and 6 months and be invited to participate in an optional interview after the 6-month assessment.
Providing financial navigation to blood cancer survivors.
Active Comparator: Ad Hoc Navigation
Ad hoc navigation in which participant is provided study-based financial navigator to contact as needed. All participants will complete an assessment at baseline, 3 months and 6 months and be invited to participate in an optional interview after the 6-month assessment.
Providing financial navigation to blood cancer survivors.
Active Comparator: No study-based Navigation
No access to a study-based financial navigator, but access to a national hotline through the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. All participants will complete an assessment at baseline, 3 months and 6 months and be invited to participate in an optional interview after the 6-month assessment.
Providing financial navigation to blood cancer survivors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Personal Financial Wellness Scale (PFW)
Time Frame: 6 months
To evaluate the change in financial distress associated with randomization group assignment from baseline to 6-month follow up as measured by the 8-item Personal Financial Wellness Scale (PFW). The PFW scores range from 1-10 where lower scores indicate greater financial distress.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) Measures
Time Frame: 6 months
As part of Aim 1, we will explore whether changes in financial distress (baseline to 6-months) are moderated by emotional distress, self-efficacy, and cognitive functioning, as measured by Patient-Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 4-item short forms for emotions distress (depression and anxiety) and self-efficacy, as well as the 4-item cognitive functioning scale from the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-Qol) battery. For each of these short forms, high scores connote better functioning.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan K Parsons, MD, MRP, Tufts Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Subscribe