Evaluation of an IgG Deficiency Rapid Screening Test: A Performance Study With Primary Immunodeficiency (PID) Patients in Tunisia

March 4, 2024 updated by: Megan Parker, PATH

Evaluation of an IgG Deficiency Rapid Screening Test (RDT) With Human Capillary Samples: A Protocol to Generate RDT Performance Data in Primary Immunodeficiency Patients (PID)

To evaluate the usability and utility of the device, % agreement between the PID-RDT and the referent assay (serum/plasma), and % agreement between capillary blood and venous blood samples using the PID-RDT within confirmed PID patients prior to receipt of their monthly IV-Ig treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

PID patients prior to receiving IV-Ig treatment infusions for the first time or during follow-up at the NBMT center in Tunis. The day of their monthly infusion, they are expected to have the lowest residual IgG level. These patients have previously been identified with AG, HAG, CVID and HIGM and this is why they are receiving IV-Ig therapy at NBMT. Patients will be 6 months of age or older and the patient or guardian must give consent for participation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 6 months of age.
  • The types of PID presenting for IV-Ig therapy will include Evaluation of PID RDT with human capillary blood (version 1.0) | 8agammaglobulinemia (AG), hypogammaglobulinemia (HAG), common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and hyper IgM syndrome (HIGM).

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluateusability among end users of the PID rapid screening tests using capillary blood samples obtained from PID patients, prior to receipt of IV-Ig treatment.
Time Frame: 3 month

- Did the test run correctly when following the IFU?

•Was the end user (nurse) able to interpret a test result for the patient from the investigational PID RDT (positive, negative) with valid control using a patient's capillary finger prick sample?

3 month
To evaluate % agreement between the PID RDT(using capillary blood)and the referent test (serum/plasma).
Time Frame: 3 months
What is the % agreement between the PID RDT run on capillary blood (Capillary Test A) and the referent assay run on plasma/serum?
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determinethe utility of the PID RDTwith PID patients.
Time Frame: 3 months

Can the investigational PID RDT be used with a finger prick (capillary) blood sample among study participants?

  • Was the finger prick blood sample successfully collected from the finger and transferred to the PID RDT?•Did the test run complete and give a valid result when run according to instructions?
  • Could a result be interpreted from the PID RDT?
3 months
To determine% agreement between capillary and venous blood samples using the PID RDT
Time Frame: 3 months
What is the % agreement between fresh capillary blood and fresh venous blood using the PID RDT?
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Knowledge gained from this study may benefit society by providing information on the diagnostic accuracy of the first PID RDT. Data obtained from this study will be made available to the test manufacturer to support their product dossier, and ultimately to provide countries still working to eradicate polio with quality-assured PID RDTs with analytical and clinical performance beyond that provided by the Jeffrey Modell warning signs.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

Clinical Trials on IgG deficiency rapid screening test

3
Subscribe