Effect of Interceptive Strategies on the Clinical Outcome of Maxillary Impacted Canines

March 6, 2025 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
This study aims to investigate the effect of 3 randomly applied interceptive measures (slow maxillary expansion, extraction of deciduous canines and no intervention) on maxillary canine impaction in patients with early mixed dentition and lack of space in the dental arch. Additionally, these groups are compared with a control group with adequate space. Patients with at least one impacted maxillary canine, presence of deciduous canines and absence of crossbite were included. The canine position is assessed by measuring five variables (sector of the canine cusp, canine to midline angle, canine to first premolar angle, canine cusp to midline distance, and canine cusp to maxillary plane distance) on 2 panoramic radiographs at 0 (T1) and 18 months (T2).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The detailed information regarding methodology has been entered in following sections

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vlaams Brabant
      • Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients presenting at the intake consultation of the Department of Orthodontics of University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium from September 2016, with at least one maxillary permanent canine impaction are invited to participate. Canine impaction is diagnosed based on a panoramic radiograph, taken for standard evaluation of dental development and associated pathology. A maxillary canine is considered to be impacted when the canine to midline angle was ≥15° (Alqerban et al. 2014; Warford et al. 2003). Only impacted maxillary canines with incomplete root formation and with persisting deciduous canines are included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of uni- or bilateral posterior dental crossbite,
  • upper permanent canines showing root malformation, ankylosis or fully erupted,
  • evidence of root resorption of adjacent teeth, previous orthodontic treatment,
  • craniofacial syndromes,
  • systemic disease that would impede orthodontic treatment/surgery and recent exposure to radiotherapy.
  • large eruption follicles seen on the permanent canines

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Maxillary expansion

All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction.

Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and are treated with maxillary expansion

The upper jaw is expanded with a removable expansion plate
Experimental: Extraction of deciduous canines

All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction.

Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and are treated with extraction of deciduous canines

Both deciduous upper canines are extracted in this group
No Intervention: No intervention

All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction.

Patients in this arm present also lack of space in the upper jaw and no intervention is performed

No Intervention: Control

All included patients (in all arms) present (at least one) maxillary canine impaction.

Patients in this arm do not present lack of space in the upper jaw and no intervention is performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously up to 18 Months of Follow up
Time Frame: 18 months
Number of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously up to 18 months of follow up.
18 months
Number of Definitive Upper Canines That Erupt Spontaneously After 18 Months of Follow up
Time Frame: After the first 18 months of follow up
Number of definitive upper canines that erupt spontaneously after 18 months of follow up..
After the first 18 months of follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sector Where the Canine is Located
Time Frame: 18 months
The sector is the position where the canine overlaps with adjacent teeth in a panoramic radiograph. The distance between the dental midline and the premolars is divided in 5 equally large spaces (units or categories 0 to 4) defined as follows: 0 = normal position (the cusp of the definitive canine is at the primary canine), 1 = distal to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 2 = mesial to the long axis of the lateral incisor, 3 = distal to the long axis of the central incisor, or 4 = mesial to the long axis of the central incisor This outcome measurement refers to the change in the Sector category where the canine is located, measured on a panoramic RX
18 months
Angulation of the Canine Towards the Dental Midline
Time Frame: 18 months
Change in the Angulation of the canine towards the dental midline, measured on a panoramic RX
18 months
Angulation of the Canine Towards the First Premolar
Time Frame: 18 months
Change in the Angulation of the canine towards the first premolar
18 months
Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Midline
Time Frame: 18 months
Change in the Distance between the canine cusp and the midline
18 months
Distance Between the Canine Cusp and the Occlusal Plane
Time Frame: 18 months
Chenge in the Distance between the canine cusp and the occlusal plane, measured on a
18 months
Need for Further Minor and/or Major Orthodontic Intervention
Time Frame: 18 months after baseline
Need for further minor and/or major orthodontic interventions
18 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Cadenas, UZ Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth, Impacted

Clinical Trials on Maxillary expansion

Subscribe