Promoting Cognitive Resilience and Reducing Frailty in Older Veterans With Bright Light Therapy (Brite-VET)

January 26, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by vulnerability to stressors that is intricately linked to cognitive impairment and mortality risk. Bright light therapy (BLT) reduces circadian disturbances by resynchronizing the hypothalamic biological clock via specific wavelengths of light. Human trials have demonstrated that BLT improves sleep quality and cognitive function in older adults. However, BLT has not been examined for use in older Veteran populations, particularly the impact on frailty. This randomized trial will assess the feasibility of employing BLT to study impacts on frailty, cognition, and sleep in older Veterans. Findings from this pilot will establish the power and effect size necessary for larger trials to support the use of BLT as readily available home-based treatment to improve healthspan of Veterans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Promoting cognition and reducing frailty in older Veterans with bright light therapy Frailty is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by vulnerability to stressors that increases disability and mortality risk. Thirty percent of Veterans 65 years or older are frail, which is three-times higher than aged matched non-Veterans. Frailty is intricately linked with cognitive impairment and Veterans are particularly susceptible with 14 percent exhibiting cognitive decline, some with early onset as young as 45 years of age. Importantly, 70% of frail and cognitively impaired older adults exhibit sleep disturbances, which makes identifying and improving sleep quality an attractive therapeutic strategy to enhance healthspan. Furthermore, this is of special interest as 55% of older Veterans experience sleep disturbances. The goal of this study is to examine the feasibility of utilizing bright light therapy (BLT) as a strategy to improve sleep via reduction of circadian rhythm disturbances. The long-term goal is to assess the potential for improving cognition and reducing frailty in older Veterans. BLT works by resynchronizing the hypothalamic biological clock via brief exposure to specific wavelengths of light following awakening, which restores melatonin and circadian rhythms. However, BLT has not been examined for reducing frailty in older Veteran populations. This project will therefore lay the foundation for larger trials the evaluate BLT in the treatment and prevention of cognitive disorders and to promote healthy aging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64128
        • Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64128-2226
        • Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants studied in this project will include 30 men and 5 women of any race who are community dwellers
  • The investigators seek to recruit relatively healthy individuals that may or may not exhibit early-stage co-morbidities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators will exclude individuals without sleep disturbances (PSQI >5)
  • Are morbidly obese (BMI > 40)
  • Exhibit severe or advanced co-morbidities, or have cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: BLT control
Bright light glasses that emit a non-therapeutic blue light.
Bright light glasses that emit a more intense therapeutic blue light.
Bright light glasses that emit a non-therapeutic blue light.
Active Comparator: BLT intervention
Bright light glasses that emit a more intense therapeutic blue light.
Bright light glasses that emit a more intense therapeutic blue light.
Bright light glasses that emit a non-therapeutic blue light.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep quality
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Sleep quality as assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI contains 19 self-rated questions that combined to form 7 component scores, each with a range of 0 to 3 points. These in turn are added to yield a global score with a range of 0 to 21 points. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Composition (Lean and fat mass)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Body composition will be measured using bioelectric impedance (BIA) - a technique where participants are asked to stand on the measurement device and hold on to two metal handles. A light - and non-detectable - current is then transmitted allowing for collection of body fat and lean mass in the subject. The assessment takes roughly 2-3 minutes.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Step counts
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Objectively measure activity using FITBIT Charge 5 actigraphy devices. These devices are worn on the wrist and capture total steps.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Chronic inflammation may be indicative of distress and lead to chronic diseases. The study will examine the change in C-reactive protein in picograms per milliliter in serum from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Serum cognitive marker: change in Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in picograms per milliliter from baseline to endpoint after 12 weeks.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Cognitive screen - SLUMS
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Cognitive status will be assessed using the VA - St. Louis University Mental Survey (VA-SLUMS) involving memory tests, shape recognition, and story recall. The survey scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score representing greater cognitive capability.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks Quality of life assessment is performed using the Quality of life, enjoyment, and satisfaction questionnaire - short form (Q-LES-Q-SF) survey instrument. The survey instrument scores from 0 to 70 with a greater score representing better quality of life.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Sleep chronotype
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleep chronotype as assessed by the Morningness/Eveningness survey, which contains 19 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 19 to 72.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleepiness
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleepiness as assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, which contains 8 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 0 to 24.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Insomnia
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Insomnia as assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index, which contains 7 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 0 to 28.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Fatigue as assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory, which contains 9 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 0 to 90.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Anxiety and depression as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which contains 14 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and depression.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleep disorders
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleep disorders as assessed by the Holland Sleep Disorders Questionnaire, which contains 32 self-rated questions with an aggregate score range of 32 and 160. Higher scores indicate more sleep disorders.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleep quantity
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Objectively measure sleep quantity using FITBIT Charge 5 devices. These devices are worn on the wrist and can measure total sleep time.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Interleukin-6
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Chronic inflammation may be indicative of distress and lead to chronic diseases. The study will examine the change in interleukin-6 in picograms per milliliter in serum from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Interleukin-10
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Chronic inflammation may be indicative of distress and lead to chronic diseases. The study will examine the change in interleukin-10 in picograms per milliliter in serum from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Amyloid beta 42/40 ratio
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Serum cognitive marker: change in amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (a unitless measure derived from the ratio of serum amyloid-beta 42 in picograms per milliliter divided by serum amyloid-beta 40 in picograms per milliliter) from baseline to endpoint after 12 weeks.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Phosphorylated tau (P-tau)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Serum cognitive marker: plasma levels of phosphorylated tau (P-tau) in picograms per milliliter from baseline to endpoint after 12 weeks.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Cognitive screen - Cognivue
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Cognivue to assess cognition. This is a computer based combinatorial visual and reaction time test, which is scored 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Sleep stages
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Objectively measure duration of sleep stages using FITBIT Charge 5 devices. These devices are worn on the wrist and assess time spent in light, deep, and REM sleep stages.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
The Short physical performance battery (SPPB) is a battery of test often used in geriatric research to capture functional capacity in older adults. The test includes a balance and coordination assessment via asking participants to hold stances with three different foot positions (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem: score 0-4), a gait speed test of approximately 10 feet (score 0-4 based on time), and a chair rise timed test where a participant is asked to rise from a chair 5 times (score 0-4 based on time). The composite score is therefore 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better performance.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Frailty assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Frailty is a syndrome marked by greater susceptibility to adverse outcomes like falls and disability. We will be using the Fried Frailty Phenotype that includes: 1) unexpected weight loss of 5% or more in the last year or BMI < 18.5; score 0 or 1 if positive, 2) grip strength with BMI dependent cut points for men and women; score 0 or 1 if positive, 3) gait speed with height and sex dependent cutoffs; score 0 or 1 if positive, 4) activity assessed by a survey of the frequency of mild/moderate/energetic physical activity; score of 0 or 1, the latter if positive for hardly ever or never engaging in moderate or energetic physical activity, and 5) endurance assessed by survey of bed rest during the day; score of 0 or 1, the latter if occurring every day or every week. The composite score is therefore 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more frailty.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Gait speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Participants are asked to perform a timed walk of approximately 15 feet in length.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks Leg and arm strength will be measured using a small handheld dynamometer where the device is placed on the wrist or ankle as the participant is asked to extend or contract the limb with full force.
Change from baseline to endpoint at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruce R. Troen, MD, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Final data sets will be made available upon specific request and under an authorized Data Use Agreement. This, in addition to the publications being made available via PubMed Central, will enable validation of results by recipients.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After analysis and completion of study along with subsequent publication of results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After analysis and completion of study along with subsequent publication of results.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Veteran Aged 65 and Older

Clinical Trials on Bright Light Therapy (AYO Glasses)

Subscribe