Comparisons of Blood Pressure Control Ability Between HPI, ClearSight, and Conventional NIBP During Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

December 25, 2023 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Comparisons of the Blood Pressure Control Ability Between Hypotension Prediction Index With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring With Non-invasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Waveforms, and Intermittent Blood Pressure Monitoring With Conventional Non-invasive Blood Pressureduring Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to compare the blood pressure control ability with HPI, ClearSight, and conventional NIBP during neuraxial anesthesia in cesarean section. The main question it aims to answer is:

Anesthesiologists can have a better control of blood pressure during cesarean section with HPI than with conventional NIBP.

During the surgery, the participants will be monitored with standard monitor and HPI with ClearSight and will be randomly assigned to three groups, including HPI group, ClearSight group, and NIBP group. Anesthesiologists will treat intraoperative hypotension with different protocols according to the participants' allocation. Investigators will compare the time-weighted average mean arterial pressure < 65mmHg with in three groups. Secondary outcomes includes the intraoperative hypotension rate, total duration of hypotension, the hypotension symptoms and signs of parturients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

255

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Po-Yuan Shih

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 20 - 50 year-old parturients
  • scheduled cesarean delivery
  • neuraxial anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • parturients with preeclampsia
  • parturients with cardiovascular disease above NYHA functional class 2
  • parturients with arrhythmias, preoperative severe hypertension, or other severe cardiopulmonary diseases.
  • severe perioperative arrhythmias with or without hemodynamic instability
  • failed neuraxial anesthesia or regional blockade level below T6

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HPI

Standard intraoperative monitor and non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight) are set up in this group. ClearSight data and hypotension prediction index (HPI) derived from ClearSight are used for recording and monitoring. Blood pressure is monitored with ClearSight and HPI. Attending anesthesiologists controlled the blood pressure according to HPI values.

  1. Maintain HPI below 85
  2. HPI > 85 and heart rate > 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg
  3. HPI > 85 and heart rate < 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg with atropine 0.01 mg/kg
The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) is an algorithm based on the complex analysis of features in high-fidelity arterial pressure waveform recordings developed to observe subtle signs that could predict the onset of hypotension in surgical and intensive care unit patients. HPI is a unitless number that ranges from 1 to 100, and as the number increases, the likelihood of a hypotensive event (MAP <65 mm Hg for more than 1 minute) occurring in the near future increases. In a validation study on HPI conducted in patients under general anesthesia, the algorithm, at its optimal value, predicted hypotension with both sensitivity and specificity of 86% 5 minutes before the event. Measurement of the arterial pressure waveforms using a finger cuff (ClearSight) is well established.
Active Comparator: ClearSight

Standard intraoperative monitor and non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight) are set up in this group. ClearSight data and HPI derived from ClearSight are used for recording, and HPI are masked for attending anesthesiologists. Blood pressure is monitored with ClearSight. Attending anesthesiologists controlled the blood pressure according to continuous arterial pressure values.

  1. Maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg
  2. MAP < 65mmHg and heart rate > 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg
  3. MAP < 65mmHg and heart rate < 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg with atropine 0.01 mg/kg
ClearSight is a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring device using digital-cuff and volume-clamp technology to obtain a continuous arterial blood pressure waveform. Continuous finger blood pressure measurement is established by wrapping the cuff around the middle phalanx of a finger. The area under the waveform curve is analyzed using a unique algorithm that serves to calculate the arterial blood pressure, stroke volume (SV) and CO.
No Intervention: NIBP

Standard intraoperative monitor and non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight) are set up in this group. ClearSight data and HPI derived from ClearSight are used for recording, and are masked for attending anesthesiologists. Blood pressure is monitored with conventional non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). Attending anesthesiologists controlled the blood pressure according to continuous arterial pressure values.

  1. Maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg
  2. MAP < 65mmHg and heart rate > 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg
  3. MAP < 65mmHg and heart rate < 60/min, IV bolus norepinephrine 5-10 mcg with atropine 0.01 mg/kg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
time-weighted MAP below 65 mmHg
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rates of parturients with intraoperative hypotension
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
hypotension is defined as MAP below 65 mmHg for more than 1 minute
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
total hypotension duration
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
hypotension is defined as MAP below 65 mmHg for more than 1 minute
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
area under curve of hypotension
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
hypotension is defined as MAP below 65 mmHg for more than 1 minute
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
total vasopressor dosage
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
average norepinephrine dosage used during the surgery
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
rate of hypotension related symptoms and sign of the parturients
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
symptoms and signs include nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, dizziness, and shivering
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
average regional cerebral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours
through the surgery completion, an average of 1.5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202210114RINC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on hypotension prediction index derived from non-invasive arterial pressure waveforms

Subscribe