Effects of Coherent Breathing Breathwork on Health

May 11, 2023 updated by: Guy Fincham, University of Sussex

Effects of Coherent Breathing Breathwork on Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Randomised Placebo-controlled Study

The investigators are conducting a randomised-controlled trial comparing coherent breathing at ~5.5 breath cycles per minute-bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of ~5.5secs each) to a well-designed placebo (paced breathing at 12bcpm with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of 2.5secs each). The metric of 12bcpm is in line with guidance from the British Journal of Nursing, Royal College of Physicians, and Johns Hopkins University which state that the average, healthy bcpm should range from: 12-20bcpm, 12-18bcpm, and 12-16bcpm, respectively, hence the investigators chose the minimum/lower bound for the active placebo control group. The main questions that our study attempts to address are: Does coherent breathing (and placebo coherent breathing) lead to improved mental health and wellbeing in a general population adult sample?

The study will be conducted entirely online through the research platform Prolific, so participant data will be anonymous. The investigators will collect self-reports of mental health and wellbeing before and after the four-week breathwork period, along with a follow-up one-month later. Pre-post intervention and follow-up questionnaires will be completed online via the survey platform Qualtrics which will be linked to Prolific. Participants will also be asked how many times they practiced out of the assigned 28 days, to gauge self-reported adherence to the protocol. The investigators can then observe whether self-reported adherence correlates with changes in mental health and wellbeing, if any. Data on the self-reported credibility/expectancy of the breathwork randomly allocated to participants will also be collected, along with open-ended responses on participants' overall experience of the protocol/study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria (self-assessed):

  • 18+ years of age (18 is the automatic minimum age on Prolific)
  • Able to breathe through nose
  • Have access to headphones
  • The following pre-screeners on Prolific will also be set so only those eligible on Prolific will see the study: Located/living in UK, Fluent in English, approval rate of 98% and at least 20 previous submissions (as recommended by Prolific to increase retention and reduce dropout rates in longitudinal and multi-part studies)

Exclusion Criteria (self-assessed):

  • Any problems which affect ones ability to pace their breathing (i.e., active/chronic respiratory infection including blocked nose/cough/cold/fever, etc.), breathlessness, cardiovascular problems, respiratory conditions or diseases (i.e., uncontrolled symptomatic asthma, COPD, lung cancer, etc.), abnormally slow breathing (bradypnea), or abnormally fast breathing (tachypnoea)
  • Any other physical/mental health conditions or current life events which impair or affect ones ability to engage in activities involving breath control

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Coherent breathing
Guided audio of coherent breathing pre-recorded by trained breathwork facilitator: ~5.5bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of ~5.5secs each) for ~10mins/day over four weeks / 28 days. Delivered remotely through audio link.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo coherent breathing
Same audio of coherent breathing but paced at: ~12bcpm (with equal inhalation/exhalation durations of 2.5secs each) for ~10mins/day over four weeks / 28 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective stress
Time Frame: Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention). Primary timepoint is post-intervention
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) - stress subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome). Score on DASS-21 is then multiplied by two to convert it to the longer form DASS-42 final score
Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention). Primary timepoint is post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective anxiety
Time Frame: Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
DASS-21 - anxiety subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome)
Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Subjective depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
DASS-21 - depression subscale (score range: 0-21; higher scores denote worse outcome)
Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Self-reported adherence to protocol
Time Frame: Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention)
Number of sessions participants self-report practicing out of 28 days assigned
Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention)
Subjective wellbeing
Time Frame: Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
The World Health Organisation-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) (score range: 0-25; higher scores denote better outcome)
Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Subjective sleep disturbance
Time Frame: Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8a (score range: 5-40; higher scores denote worse outcome). Data scored using a T-score transformation according to PROMIS Sleep scoring manual on: www.healthmeasures.net
Pre-post intervention and follow-up (immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Self-reported credibility and expectancy of protocol
Time Frame: Immediately after starting breathwork intervention
Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ-6). Two Sets (Credibility of course/therapy [breathwork] and expectancy of course/therapy [breathwork]). Four items scored 1-9 and two items scored 0-100%. Higher scores denote greater credibility and/or expectancy of specific breathwork technique
Immediately after starting breathwork intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall experience
Time Frame: Post-intervention and follow-up (immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Optional open-ended questions on participants' perspectives and overall experience of the protocol/study-period
Post-intervention and follow-up (immediately after the intervention, and four weeks after the intervention)
Impairment of practice
Time Frame: Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention)
Optional open-ended question on whether anything impaired participants' ability to perform their randomly allocated breathwork
Post-intervention (immediately after the intervention)
Hypothesis guessing
Time Frame: Follow-up (four weeks after the intervention)
Optional open-ended question on whether participants can guess the hypothesis of the study
Follow-up (four weeks after the intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guy W Fincham, MSc, University of Sussex

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sussex coherent breath study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All participant data will be anonymous (only Prolific user IDs will be seen). No identifiable personal information will be collected. Participants will be able to check a box if they are happy for our research team at the University of Sussex to include the data again in future studies related to breathwork and meditation if these have gained independent ethically approval, based on the strict confidentiality terms described in the participant info/consent form.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Indefinitely after the study has been completed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Our research team at the University of Sussex will have access. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study will be available from the principal investigator on reasonable request to other researchers working on meditation and breathwork.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wellbeing

Clinical Trials on Coherent breathing

Subscribe