- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05679167
Digital Training Interventions for Low Back Pain (DigiLum)
Digital Training Interventions for Low Back Pain - RCT With Longitudinal Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Measures and MRI Examinations
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The overall aim is to evaluate two different types of digital training interventions supervised by physiotherapists compared to daily physical activity in terms of clinical, imaging-based and patient-reported outcome in patients with low back pain. Furthermore, to evaluate whether new diagnostic MRI methods can identify longitudinal spine tissue changes and to analyse if there is an exercise-related difference.
Patients seeking primary health care for lower back pain will be randomized to three groups. The patients will be clinically examined, assessed with Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) will be evaluated at baseline and at follow-ups.
A detailed description of the study protocol, see attached document.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jenny Sivertsson, Msc
- Phone Number: 4610-435000
- Email: jenny.sivertsson@vgregion.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kristina Åhlund, PhD
- Email: kristina.ahlund@vgregion.se
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vänersborg, Sweden, 462 55
- Recruiting
- Ninni Sernert
-
Contact:
- Ninni Sernert, PhD
- Phone Number: +46702274267
- Email: ninnni.sernert@vgregion.se
-
Contact:
- Kristina Åhlund, PhD
- Email: kristina.ahlund@hv.se
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Kerstin Lagerstrand, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Low back pain> 3 months
- Age 18-50 years
- Access to computer/tablet/mobile phone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inadequate Swedish as the language is an obstacle to be able to fully understand written and oral information regarding the project and to follow training instructions
- Other ongoing treatment/exercise for their low back pain
- Patients with radiating leg pain and neurological symptoms where herniated discs are suspected
- Previous back/neck surgery
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed systematic diseases engaging the spine as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis
- Factors that prevent an MRI examination, such as claustrophobia, metal implants, etc.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Supervised digital training: core stability
The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized.
In group 1 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on core stability
|
After randomization Group 2 will be digitally supervised by experienced physiotherapist.
After randomization Group 3 will receive training instruction regarding daily physical activity.
|
|
Active Comparator: Supervised digital training: aerobic exercise
The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized.
In group 2 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise
|
After randomization Group 3 will receive training instruction regarding daily physical activity.
After randomization, Group 1 will be digitally supervised by experienced physiotherapist.
|
|
Active Comparator: Non-supervised daily physical activity
The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized.
In group 3 will start a daily physical activity program, with regular support from a physiotherapist.
|
After randomization Group 2 will be digitally supervised by experienced physiotherapist.
After randomization, Group 1 will be digitally supervised by experienced physiotherapist.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient-reported pain
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS), registration 0 (=no pain)-100 (=worst pain), where In the minimal clinically significant change has been estimated as 11 points on a 100-point scale patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the minimal clinically significant change has been estimated as 1.1 points on an 11-point scale (or 11 points on a 100-point scale)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Patient-reported pain
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) registration 0 (=no pain)-100 (=worst pain), where In the minimal clinically significant change has been estimated as 11 points on a 100-point scale
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Difference in T2 (transverse relaxation time)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
MRI can characterize tissue by two different relaxation times, T1 and T2
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Difference in T2 (transverse relaxation time)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
MRI can characterize tissue by two different relaxation times, T1 and T2
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in clinical outcomes (Standing inspection)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Normal spine curvature (yes/no)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in clinical outcomes (Standing side-to-side symmetry)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Standing side-to-side symmetry (yes/no)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Muscle hypotrophy)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Muscle hypotrophy (yes/no)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on heels)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Ability to walk on heels (yes/no)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on toes)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Ability to walk on toes (yes/no)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Standing inspection)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Normal spine curvature (yes/no)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Standing side-to-side symmetry)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Standing side-to-side symmetry (yes/no)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Muscle hypotrophy)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Muscle hypotrophy (yes/no)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on heels)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Ability to walk on heels (yes/no)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on toes)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Ability to walk on toes (yes/no)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Sit-to-stand test)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Sit-to-stand test (number of rises during 30 sec)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Prone-bridge test)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Prone-bridge test (total sec)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Åstrand ergometer test)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Åstrand ergometer test (estimated VO2-max, a measure of the maximum amount of oxygen your body can utilize during exercise)
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Sit-to-stand test)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Sit-to-stand test (number of rises during 30 sec)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Prone-bridge test)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Prone-bridge test (total sec)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in Functional tests (Åstrand ergometer test)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Åstrand ergometer test (estimated VO2-max)
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity (grading activity in minutes/week).
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (Oswestry Low Back Disability Index)
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (0-4 No disability, 5-14 Mild disability, 15-24, Moderate disability, 25-34 Severe disability).
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD))
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline abnormal, 11-21 = Abnormal).
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L))
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) according to EuroQol Group The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK))
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is 17 items a self-reporting questionnaire based on evaluation of fear of movement, fear of physical activity, and fear avoidance.
The total score of the scale range from 17- 68, where 17 means no kinesiophobia, 68 means severe kinesiophobia, and score ± 37 indicates there is kinesiophobia.
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES))
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), a 10 item self-report measure of self-efficacy, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
|
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Change in PROM (Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity (grading activity in minutes/week).
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (Oswestry Low Back Disability Index)
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (0-4 No disability, 5-14 Mild disability, 15-24, Moderate disability, 25-34 Severe disability).
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD))
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline abnormal, 11-21 = Abnormal).
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L))
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) according to EuroQol Group The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK))
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is 17 items a self-reporting questionnaire based on evaluation of fear of movement, fear of physical activity, and fear avoidance.
The total score of the scale range from 17- 68, where 17 means no kinesiophobia, 68 means severe kinesiophobia, and score ± 37 indicates there is kinesiophobia.
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
|
Change in PROM (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES))
Time Frame: 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), a 10 item self-report measure of self-efficacy, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
|
12 months compared to baseline and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Ninni IE Sernert, PhD, Göteborg University
- Study Chair: Kerstin Lagerstrand, PhD, Göteborg University
- Study Chair: Helena Brisby, PhD, Göteborg University
- Study Chair: Hanna Hebelka Bolminger, PhD, Göteborg University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Vastra Gotaland
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityIstinye UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, PosturalTurkey
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai...CompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Non-specific Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain (LBP)Japan
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
Clinical Trials on Supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
University of VermontCompletedCancer ThrombosisUnited States
-
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and...Completed
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingBreast CancerUnited States
-
University Hospital Center of MartiniqueUnknownCardiovascular DiseaseGuadeloupe, Martinique
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedMetabolic Syndrome X | Cardiovascular Problems in ElderlyEgypt
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromePakistan
-
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustKing's College LondonRecruitingProstate Cancer | Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)United Kingdom
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedPsychotic DisorderUnited States
-
Clínica de Medicina do ExercícioCompletedSubjects Evaluated With Low Cardiac Vagal Tone