How Effective is the Dose-graded Aerobic Training in Children Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia?

December 24, 2022 updated by: Ragab Kamal Elnaggar, Cairo University

Effectiveness of a Dose-graded Aerobic Exercise Regimen on Cardiopulmonary Fitness and Physical Performance in Children Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 12-week dose-graded aerobic exercise program (D-GAE) on cardiopulmonary fitness and physical performance in children survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A total of 58 ALL survivors were randomly assigned to the D-GAE group (n = 29, who underwent a combination of traditional physical rehabilitation and intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training three times per week for 12 weeks) or the control group (n = 29, who underwent only traditional physical rehabilitation).

Cardiopulmonary fitness and physical performance were evaluated in both groups before and after treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fifty-eight survivors of ALL were recruited from the hematology-oncology polyclinic at King Khalid Hospital and two referral pediatric hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included survivors aged 10-18 years, who completed maintenance therapy, had no abnormalities of the lower limbs or spine and did not participate in a regular exercise program (in the past six months). survivors who had secondary malignancies, significant musculoskeletal/neurological issues affecting the capacity to participate in exercises or neurocognitive impairments were excluded.

Outcome measures

  1. Cardiopulmonary fitness: The peak oxygen uptake was assessed through the McMaster cycling protocol.
  2. Physical Performance: Three tests were used; the 6-minute walk test, the timed up and down stairs test, and the 4x10 meter Shuttle Run test.

Interventions

The D-GAE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the traditional physical rehabilitation. The D-GAE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The D-GAE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes. The control group received the traditional physical rehabilitation only, 45 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of flexibility exercises, strengthening exercises, balance training, and general conditioning exercises.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Riyadh
      • Al Kharj, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • Ragab K. Elnaggar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Survivors of childhood ALL
  • Age of 10-18 years
  • Completion of maintenance therapy
  • Free of lower limb or spinal deformities
  • Not participating in regular exercise regimens in the past six months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary malignancies
  • Significant musculoskeletal/neurological issues
  • Neurocognitive impairments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: D-GAE group
This group received a 12-week aerobic training in addition to the traditional physical rehabilitation.
The D-GAE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the traditional physical rehabilitation. The D-GAE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The D-GAE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes
Active Comparator: Control group
This group received the traditional physical rehabilitation only
The control group received the traditional physical rehabilitation only, 45 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of flexibility exercises, strengthening exercises, balance training, and general conditioning exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak oxygen uptake
Time Frame: 3 months
The peak oxygen uptake (mL/kg/min) was assessed through a symptom-free exercise tolerance test (i.e., the McMaster cycling protocol).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-minute walk test.
Time Frame: 3 months
This test identified the maximum distance (m) that each child was able to cover over six minutes on a straight flat 30-m walkway, without running or jogging. Walking is regarded as more efficient in line with a longer distance coverage
3 months
Timed up and down stairs test
Time Frame: 3 months
This test measured the time (seconds) that each child took to climb up and down a 14-step stair flight (each 20 cm in height). Better performance is indicated by a shorter time.
3 months
4x10 meter Shuttle Run test
Time Frame: 3 months
This test measured the time (seconds) that each child took to run forth and back a 10-meter track. Better performance is indicated by a shorter time.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ragab K. Elnaggar, PhD, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Dose-graded aerobic exercises

Subscribe