Impact of Remote Care in Patients Diagnosed With Thromboembolic Disease of Low Risk (TEVEDOM)

September 9, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Eure-Seine

Evaluation of Feasibility and Impact of Remote Care in Patients With Thromboembolic Disease of Low Risk

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the feasibility and impact of remote care in patients diagnosed with thromboembolic disease of low risk. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • the evaluation of feasibility of organisation between different healthcare professionals (hospital physicians, primary care physician) at 6 months and 1 year
  • the evaluation of complication rate, hospitalisation related to thromboembolic disease rate, compliance to treatment rate at 6 months and 1 year Participants will receive indication of treatment according to national recommendations. Additionnally, they will receive for the length of study a 4G tablet in order to fill questionnaires, learn information about their drugs (patient education), have a remote consultation and evaluate treatment compliance.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients identified in the emergency department with a thromboembolic disease, with a deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with a low risk of mortality according to recommendations
  • affiliated or beneficiary of social protection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient having a severe obstruction syndrome, a thromboembolic disease already under treatment or a suspicion of thrombocytopenia induced by heparin
  • patient with an active hemorrhage or a major risk of hemorrhage, a renal severe failure, comorbidities such as cancer, or the impossibility to organise a consultation or a patient in a non favorable medico-social context
  • patient with a caval thrombosis
  • patient suffering of a disease at hemorrhagic risk or neurosurgery intervention done in the last month or other surgery in the last 15 days prior to inclusion
  • patient with contraindication of direct oral anticoagulants, such as bitherapy with antiplatelet agent, imidazoles, macrolides, antiretroviral treatments or an anti-phospholipid syndrome
  • patient that lives in an area not covered by internet
  • patient that has no primary care physician
  • patient not able to understand the study (language, psychological problem) or not able to read or write
  • patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 4G Tablet
Participants will receive for the whole period of study a 4G tablet in order to fill questionnaires, learn information about their drugs (patient education), have a remote consultation and evaluate treatment compliance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants in which the evaluation of medical and patient satisfaction regarding feasibility of organisation assessed by three scales (patient scale, hospital physician scale and primary care physician scale) is satisfactory
Time Frame: 6 months

Three scales were created for this study :

  • patient scale : difficulty perceived to use the tablet, added value in the use of tablet, improvement of communication with physicians
  • hospital physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with primary care physician
  • primary care physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with hospital physician
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients in which the evaluation of medical and patient satisfaction regarding feasibility of organisation assessed by three scales (patient scale, hospital physician scale and primary care physician scale) is satisfactory
Time Frame: 1 year

Three scales were created for this study :

  • patient scale : difficulty perceived to use the tablet, added value in the use of tablet, improvement of communication with physicians
  • hospital physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with primary care physician
  • primary care physician scale : global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), perception on the follow-up of patient through tablet, improvement of communication with patients and with hospital physician
1 year
Evaluation of complication rate related to thromboembolic disease
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year
6 months and 1 year
Evaluation of hospitalisation rate related to thromboembolic disease
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Evaluation of treatment compliance
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year
This will be evaluated by the communication between the physician and the patient during consultation
6 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Eble, MD, CH Eure-Seine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-A00894-39
  • CHES N°22/02 (Other Identifier: CH Eure-Seine)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thromboembolic Disease

Clinical Trials on 4G tablet

Subscribe