- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05689242
Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
January 17, 2023 updated by: OMAR ABDELAZIZ ABOELFADL, Assiut University
Comparative Study Between Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
The aim of this study is to compare the sedative, analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes due to dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine during elective colonoscopy.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Colonoscopy can be performed for the screening of cancer, adenomas, and polyps, for the assessment of known or possible bleeding, and for the evaluation of possible causes of abdominal pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and/or changes in bowel habits.
colonoscopy is associated with discomfort and sometimes pain.
At present, the commonly used methods are the intravenous injection of propofol, etomidate, ketamine, and other drugs to make the patient's unconscious.
The disadvantage is that the patient cannot cooperate during the examination (e.g., for changing position), and medical staff is needed to assist in turning over the patient, if necessary.
This may compress the patient's stomach and abdomen, which may cause gastric reflux and aspiration, which may cause pneumonia, with morbidity and even mortality.
Nalbuphine hydrochloride is a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid with a duration of action of approximately 3-6 hours.
It is chemically related to both the agonist analgesic oxymorphone and the antagonist naloxone, and acts as an antagonist at the μ receptor and as an agonist at the κ receptor, resulting in analgesia and sedation with minimal effects in the cardiovascular system.
Any slight RD that occurs would be restricted by a ceiling effect.
Dexmedetomidine, a new drug, is highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist.
It possesses hypnotic, sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic properties without producing significant respiratory depression.
It also reduces both anesthetic and opioid analgesic requirements during the perioperative period.
It has an impressive safety margin,and it may be suitable for conscious sedation during painful procedures.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
66
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: omar AB abulfadl, bachelor's
- Phone Number: 0021069909234
- Email: omarabulfadl1@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: hamdy youssef, prof
- Phone Number: 0021090008490
- Email: hamdyayoussef@yahoo.com
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject is scheduled for elective colonoscopy.
- The subject is ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years.
- Both sexes.
- No obvious abnormalities in preoperative ECG, blood routine ,electrolytes, and other tests .
- ASA class 1-3.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is known or believed to be pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients allergic to α2-adrenergic agonist or sulfa drugs
- Chronic Opioid Use (daily or almost daily use of opioids for > 3 months).
- Patients that are immunologically compromised, or receiving chronic steroids (>30 days), excluding inhalers.
- Sleep apnea syndrome or difficult airway.
- Patient known to be asthmatic or recent chest infection.
- Patients that are prisoners.
- Patient refusal.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group I
Receive initial loading dose of (Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg I.V) diluted up to 10 ml with normal saline infused over 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-0.8
μg/kg/h through a 50 ml syringe and an electronic infusion pump
|
intravenous dexmedetomidine for group I and nalubphine for group II in colposcopy
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Group II
Receive (Nalbuphine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg I.V) diluted up to 10 ml with normal saline infused slowly over 10 min.
|
intravenous dexmedetomidine for group I and nalubphine for group II in colposcopy
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
variable is to compare the sedation effect between Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine.
Time Frame: before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.
|
3- Sedation score: sedation will be monitored immediately after examination, at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure by Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS; 1974) The RSS scores sedation at six different levels, according to how rousable the patient is.
|
before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
variables are the hemodynamic comparison, pain score assessment and adverse event among two groups.
Time Frame: before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.
|
4- Pain score: Intensity of pain will be monitored immediately after examination, at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure by visual analogue score (VAS),The (VAS) consist of 10cm line, with to end points representing 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as it possibly be), ask the patient to rete their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line, by using a ruler to measure the distance from 0 (no pain point) to the current pain mark
|
before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kaygusuz K, Gokce G, Gursoy S, Ayan S, Mimaroglu C, Gultekin Y. A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):114-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000296453.75494.64.
- Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. No abstract available.
- Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; MAC Study Group. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):47-56. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
- Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA, Symms MR, Chadalawada V, Liangpunsakul S, Strahl E, Mendel AM, Rex DK. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Nov;1(6):425-32. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(03)00226-x.
- Muller S, Borowics SM, Fortis EA, Stefani LC, Soares G, Maguilnik I, Breyer HP, Hidalgo MP, Caumo W. Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.041. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
- Karanth H, Murali S, Koteshwar R, Shetty V, Adappa K. Comparative Study between Propofol and Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Colonoscopy. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):98-102. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_206_17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
March 1, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2023
First Posted (Estimate)
January 19, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 19, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Dexmedetomidine
- Nalbuphine
Other Study ID Numbers
- sedation in Colonoscopy
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy
-
Borland-Groover ClinicValley Medical Products, LLC is paying for the study and is the sponsor....CompletedColonoscopy | Screening Colonoscopy | Surveillance ColonoscopyUnited States
-
Josue AliagaCompleted
-
Endostart srlCompleted
-
Hospital Central Norte PEMEXCompletedPerformance of Colonoscopy | Tolerance of ColonoscopyMexico
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownInadequate Preparation for Colonoscopy; Personalized Colonoscopy PreparationIsrael
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Palo Alto Health Care System; VA Northern California Health Care SystemCompletedWater Exchange Colonoscopy | Unsedated Colonoscopy | Cap | Colonoscopy PainUnited States
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalCompletedColonoscopy | Intubation Time | Cap-assisted ColonoscopyTaiwan
-
Valduce HospitalCompletedUnsedated Colonoscopy | Warm Water | CO2 ColonoscopyItaly
-
Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research...UnknownColonoscopy | Complete Colonoscopy | Cecum Intubation Time | İleum Intubation TimeTurkey
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedInjection Site IrritationSaudi Arabia
-
South Egypt Cancer InstituteUnknownBreast Cancer FemaleEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of JordanCompleted
-
Menoufia UniversityRecruiting
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiTerminatedPostoperative Delirium | Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction | PD | POCDUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedIntrathecal DexmedetomidineEgypt
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...CompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsCanada
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptRecruitingHemodynamic | Airway ResponsesEgypt