Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking Protocols

January 27, 2025 updated by: Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, Assiut University

Pulsed Light Versus Continuous Light Accelerated Epithelium-Off Cross-linking for Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus; a Prospective Comparative Study

To evaluate and compare the effect of pulsed light (pl-ACXL) accelerated and continuous light accelerated (cl-ACXL) epithelium-off cross-linking in halting the progression of keratoconus.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Keratoconus (KC), which was first described in detail in 1854, is the most common corneal primary ectasia and is characterized by progressive bilateral and asymmetric corneal thinning and bulging outward into a cone-like shape that can severely impact patients' vision.

Keratoconus usually develops in the second and third decades of life and progresses until the fourth decade. It was thought to be a rare corneal disease.

Despite a great deal of research, no one theory explains it all and it may be caused by a combination of things. However, Meek proposed that the loss of structural integrity in the KC cornea was caused by the presence of abnormal keratocytes and matrix proteins and upregulated proteolysis triggered an unravelling of lamellae along their length and from their anchors at the limbus, with an opening of the lamellar bifurcations. This theory is supported by observations following riboflavin/UVA collagen cross-linking, where the proposed cross-linkage of the tissue increases both the resistance of the stroma to enzymatic digestion and the cohesiveness between collagen fibrils and the non-collagenous matrix.

Conventional CXL (CXL) with a continuous irradiation of 3 mW/cm2 for 30 min is considered safe and effective in the prevention of keratoconus progression according to different clinical trials. nevertheless, the procedure is time-consuming, lasting around 1 h, which may lead to patient discomfort and reduced physician working efficiency.

With evolving technical advances, commercially available UV light sources have been developed, making CXL more efficient with shorter UV exposure times, higher UV intensities, and pulsed light compared with continuous light settings. Various accelerated CXL protocols have been described and its effect on biomechanical properties on corneas stated as equal to the standard protocol. Ex-vivo studies also suggest a distinction between various accelerated CXL protocols by providing evidence for a drop in efficiency with increased UV illumination intensity while maintaining equal surface energy. In this study we evaluate the two types of "accelerated crosslinking".

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71516
        • TIBA Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with mild to moderate progressive keratoconus with maximum keratometry value Kmax < 56.0 D, Corneal thinnest pachymetry ≥ 400 µm and Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) equal to or better than 20/200 Snellen's acuity.
  2. Established keratoconus progression:

    Increase of 1.0D or more in the manifest cylinder Increase of 0.5D or more in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent Increase of 1.0D or more in Kmax Increase of 0.75D or more in Kmean decrease of 2% or more in central thickness

  3. Age: 18-40 y
  4. Clear cornea

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Corneal scarring
  2. Previous corneal surgery
  3. Severe keratoconus wit non measurable refraction or Kmax ≥ 56 D or Corneal thinnest pachymetry < 400 µm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: group 1
Patients in this group will undergo pulsed light accelerated crosslinking (pl-ACXL)
Epithelium-off accelerated corneal crosslinking is a procedure in which the cornea is soaked with riboflavin followed by exposure to ultraviolet irradiation in either pulsed-light or continuous-light modes to strengthen the corneal stroma and halt keratoconus progression.
Active Comparator: group 2
Patients in this group will undergo continuous-light accelerated crosslinking (cl-ACXL)
Epithelium-off accelerated corneal crosslinking is a procedure in which the cornea is soaked with riboflavin followed by exposure to ultraviolet irradiation in either pulsed-light or continuous-light modes to strengthen the corneal stroma and halt keratoconus progression.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Visual outcome measures
Time Frame: one year following surgery
Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA & CDVA) using Snellen acuity chart
one year following surgery
2. Refractive outcome measures
Time Frame: one year following surgery
Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) using Topcon autorefractometer
one year following surgery
3. Topographic outcome measures
Time Frame: one year following surgery
Scheimflug imaging device (Pentacam) for Diagnosis and follow up of Keratoconus after ACXL
one year following surgery
Demarcation line depth
Time Frame: 3 months following surgery
Demarcation line depth is an outcome used to assess the success of CXL procedure using anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (AS-OCT)
3 months following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • accelerated cross-linking

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe