AI Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy (AimdR)

Accuracy of an AI Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Real-life

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus represents a major health problem, especially since around 40% of diabetic patients develop diabetic retinopathy, which severely impairs vision and can lead to blindness. This development could be prevented by annual check-ups and timely referral for treatment. However, there are major differences in the quality of examinations and bottlenecks in examination appointments. A solution to the problem could be the use of artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning. Initial studies have shown that deep learning algorithms can be used successfully to detect diabetic retinopathy. However, it remains to be clarified whether the use of AI can achieve a sufficiently high level of accuracy in the detection of retinopathies. Therefore, in the present study, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV), the sensitivity (SEN) and the specificity (SPEZ) of the AI algorithm 'MONA-DR-Model' in the detection of diabetic retinopathy should be measured. In addition, it is to be examined how well the classification into mild and severe retinopathy corresponds and how well this new examination method is accepted by the patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As part of the study, a 45-degree fundus image is taken for each eye and patient using the 'Crystalvue NFC 600'. The fundus photographs are then analyzed using the 'MONA-DR-Mode'l and classified as "diabetic retinopathy according to AI present (K+)" or "diabetic retinopathy according to AI absent (K-)". These classifications are compared with the results ("diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor present (A+)" or "diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor absent (A-)") of the examinations routinely provided for in the Disease Management Program (DMP) diabetes mellitus type 2 by resident ophthalmologists who work in the period 6 months before and after the fundus photography in the West German Centre of Diabetes and Health (WDGZ) were compared. All patients with the assessment "diabetic retinopathy according to AI present (K+)" or discrepancies with the ophthalmological DMP examination in the outpatient environment are offered a routine appointment at the Marienhospital. There, an eye examination is then carried out by an ophthalmologist and, without knowledge of the previous findings, a reassessment and classification as "diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor present (A+)" or "diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor absent (A-)" is carried out by the AI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40591
        • Recruiting
        • West German Center of Diabetes and Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephan Martin, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of the West German Centre of Diabetes and Health with Type 2 Diabetes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Diabetes duration ≥ 5 years
  • Age > 18 years old
  • Patient is able to give informed consent
  • Fluent in written and spoken German, or interpreter present

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of laser treatment
  • Contraindication to the fundus imaging systems used in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
K+A+
diabetic retinopathy according to AI present (K+) AND diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor present (A+)
A 45-degree fundus image is taken for each eye and patient using the Crystalvue NFC 600. The fundus photographs are then analyzed using the MONA DR model and classified for presence of diabetic retinopathy.
K+A-
diabetic retinopathy according to AI present (K+) AND diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor absent (A-)
A 45-degree fundus image is taken for each eye and patient using the Crystalvue NFC 600. The fundus photographs are then analyzed using the MONA DR model and classified for presence of diabetic retinopathy.
K-A+
diabetic retinopathy according to AI absent (K-) AND diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor present (A+)
A 45-degree fundus image is taken for each eye and patient using the Crystalvue NFC 600. The fundus photographs are then analyzed using the MONA DR model and classified for presence of diabetic retinopathy.
K-A-
diabetic retinopathy according to AI absent (K-) AND diabetic retinopathy according to the doctor absent (A-)
A 45-degree fundus image is taken for each eye and patient using the Crystalvue NFC 600. The fundus photographs are then analyzed using the MONA DR model and classified for presence of diabetic retinopathy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PPV
Time Frame: 12 months
positive predictive value
12 months
NPV
Time Frame: 12 months
negative predictive value
12 months
SEN
Time Frame: 12 months
sensitivity
12 months
SPEZ
Time Frame: 12 months
specificity
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patients preferences
Time Frame: 12 months
questionnaire for patients preferences and satisfaction concerning the AI-supported eye examination
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm of the MONA DR model

Subscribe