A I in the Prediction of Clinical Performance, Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance of Vertical Versus Horizontal Margin Designs Fabricated With 2 Ceramic Materials

December 1, 2023 updated by: Walaa Tarek Mohamed, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Clinical Performance, Marginal Fit and Fracture Resistance of Vertical Versus Horizontal Margin Designs Fabricated With Two Ceramic Materials

The present study will be performed to evaluate application of artificial intelligence in the prediction of clinical performance, marginal fit and fracture resistance of vertical "feather-edge" versus horizontal "shoulder" margin designs fabricated with two ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The objective of the present study is to characterize two different margin designs (vertical "feather-edge" and horizontal "shoulder") with two different ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic) in terms of clinical performance, marginal fit and fracture resistance.

Primary outcome:

Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model for vertical "feather-edge" versus horizontal "shoulder" margin designs fabricated with two ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic) that saves the clinical evaluation period, hence saves the expenses of the dental clinic.

Secondary outcome:

Evaluating the clinical performance, marginal fit and fracture resistance of vertical "feather-edge" versus horizontal "shoulder" margin designs fabricated with two ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Al-Azhar University
      • Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt, 02
        • Recruiting
        • Walaa Tarek El Hefnawy
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age range of patients should be 20-50 years old, able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2. Patient with posterior molars indicated for full coverage restorations. 3. Patient should be able to physically and psychologically tolerate conventional restorative procedures. 4. Patients who are willing to return for follow-up examination and evaluation. 5. Indicated molar should have adequate tooth preparation length to ensure proper retention and resistance form. 6. Patient with sound contralateral or adjacent tooth to the selected tooth requiring full coverage restoration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
  2. Patient with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
  3. Pregnant women.
  4. Patient with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
  5. Patients with no opposing occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration.
  6. Patients with parafunctional habits. -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group (I)
Patients will be prepared with vertical "feather edge" margin design.
comparing two different materials and two different designs. use artificial intelligence in the prediction of follow up results
Other Names:
  • Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model
Experimental: Group (II)
Patients will be prepared with horizontal "shoulder" margin design.
comparing two different materials and two different designs. use artificial intelligence in the prediction of follow up results
Other Names:
  • Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model
Experimental: Subgroup (A)
Patients will receive zirconia ceramic crowns
comparing two different materials and two different designs. use artificial intelligence in the prediction of follow up results
Other Names:
  • Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model
Experimental: Subgroup (B)
Patients will receive hybrid ceramic crowns.
comparing two different materials and two different designs. use artificial intelligence in the prediction of follow up results
Other Names:
  • Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Artificial intelligence application assessment, laboratory marginal fit and fracture resistance
Time Frame: 6 months
Predicting the follow up results using the new (artificial intelligence "AI") model for vertical "feather-edge" versus horizontal "shoulder" margin designs fabricated with two ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic) that saves the clinical evaluation period, hence saves the expenses of the dental clinic.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-Vitro Study preparations.
Time Frame: 6 months
Marginal Adaptation "feather-edge" versus horizontal "shoulder" margin designs fabricated with two ceramic materials (zirconia and hybrid ceramic).
6 months
In-Vitro Study
Time Frame: 6 months
Fracture Resistance
6 months
In-Vivo Study
Time Frame: Baseline,3 months,6 months
Clinical Examination
Baseline,3 months,6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P-CR-23-04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence

Clinical Trials on change in restoration material and margin design.

3
Subscribe