Techniques and Pitfalls of Multi-Slice CT Coronary Angiography

February 6, 2023 updated by: Mostafa Magdy Mahmoud, Sohag University
The goal of this study is to describe the techniques for coronary multi-slice CT angiography and to illustrate the spectrum of artifacts that can simulate coronary artery stenosis and lead to non-assessable segments using 128- and 160 multi-detector row CT scanners and discuss post-processing pitfalls with each. In addition, to review the normal anatomy and anatomic variants of the coronary arteries and discuss effective strategies for improving the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Sohag, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Sohag University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients of at least 18 years of age, with suspected symptomatic CAD.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Un cooperative patients.
  • Those who have allergy to iodinated contrast material or contrast-induced nephropathy,
  • Elevated serum creatinine level (1.5 mg/dl) or creatinine clearance >60 ml/min.
  • Atrial fibrillation.
  • Aortic stenosis.
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 6 months.
  • Intolerance to beta-blockers.
  • Body mass index > 40
  • Patients with Agatston calcium scores of >400

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participants
Radiation: Coronary computed tomography angiography

All patients will be subjected to:

Two CT scans (coronary calcium scoring and angiography) using 128 or 160-row scanners with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm (Revolution Evo 128, GE Health care, Chicago, Illinois, USA) or (Aquilion 160, Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). Calcium scoring will be performed with the use of prospective electrocardiographic gating with 400-ms gantry rotation, 120-kV tube voltage, and 300-mA tube current. For CTA, retrospective electrocardiographic gating will be used, with heart rate adjusted gantry rotations of 350 ms to 500 ms to enable adaptive multisegmented reconstruction.

Iopromide (Ultravist 370, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany) is the intravenous contrast medium that will be used for CTA. Beta-blockers will be given if the resting heart rate is 70 beats/min.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of techniques
Time Frame: 2 months
The number of possible techniques used to perform CT coronary angiography
2 months
Number of pitfalls
Time Frame: 3 months
The number of pitfalls that could mimic coronary artery stenosis and lead to non-assessable segments
3 months
Number of possible strategies to overcome the pitfalls of the study
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sohag University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Soh-Med-23-01-11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe