TEAS for the Treatment of Pain in Bone Metastases of Lung Cancer

Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) for the Treatment of Pain in Bone Metastases of Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective RCT Study

This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled research study aims to objectively evaluate the role of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), which combines the theory of acupuncture with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy, for the treatment of pain in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

188

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of non-small cell lung cancer and had a diagnosis of definite bone-metastatic-related pain.
  • Potent opioid analgesics have been prescribed regularly.
  • Bone protective agents (bisphosphonates or desumumab) have been used regularly.
  • Expected survival ≥ 3 months with no obvious contraindication to opioid therapy.
  • Stable vital signs and ECOG-PS score ≤ 2 points; able to cooperate with researchers to complete relevant study evaluations.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Definitively diagnosed with pain unrelated to lung cancer.
  • Received local radiation therapy or surgery targeting bone metastases within 1 week before enrollment or will receive during the intervention period. The surgery including vertebroplasty, radioparticle implantation, neurological lesions, and other minimally invasive interventions.
  • Venous thrombosis in the upper and lower extremities (below the elbow / knee joint), active cerebrovascular disease, severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction, or those with respiratory depression.
  • Pacemaker implantation or metallic implants in vivo.
  • Skin lesions at the acupoints, poor skin condition, or other situations that are not suitable for treatment with TEAS.
  • Opioid hypersensitivity.
  • Psychiatric disorders or severe cognitive deficits.
  • Participating in other clinical trialists influencing the evaluation of the results of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: sham TEAS
Each step of the sham TEAS operation is the same as the TEAS group. A total of 4 sessions of treatment were administered. 10 free TEAS treatments will be given after the trial.
The patients in both groups received routine palliative treatment of tumors, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, drug analgesic therapy, nutrition support, and so on.
The electroacupuncture instrument has a normal screen display as the Huatuo SDZ-ⅡB portable electronic needle therapy instrument, but could not output current normally.
Other Names:
  • sham TEAS
Experimental: true TEAS

A pair of conductive gel patch, connecting to the Huatuo SDZ-ⅡB portable electronic needle therapy instrument, are respectively affixed to the ipsilateral Jiaji acupoint group (EX-B2) or the ipsilateral limb acupoint group(Hegu (LI4) - Waiguan (TE5), or Zusanli (ST36) - Sanyinjiao (SP6)), so as contralateral side.

A single TEAS treatment takes 30 min. TEAS specific parameters were dilatation wave 2Hz and stimulus current intensity in degrees as tolerated by the patient.

7 days was considered as 1 session. Self-controlled treatment refers to not setting an upper limit on the number of treatment times, but must have met at least 3 days or 5 times of TEAS treatment within each session.

A total of 4 sessions of treatment were administered.

The patients are taken in the recumbent or sitting position, and the local skin at the acupoints is routinely disinfected. A pair of conductive gel patch, connecting to the Huatuo SDZ-ⅡB portable electronic needle therapy instrument, are respectively affixed to the ipsilateral acupoint group, so as contralateral side.
Other Names:
  • TEAS
The patients in both groups received routine palliative treatment of tumors, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, drug analgesic therapy, nutrition support, and so on.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The response rate of average pain in the brief pain inventory (BPI) at the end of week 4
Time Frame: week 4

According to the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for bone metastasis clinical trials, the degree of therapeutic response for bone metastatic pain can be classified as complete response (CR: pain score of 0 and no increase in daily oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) ), partial response (PR: ①pain score decrease of ≥ 2 and no increase in OMED; ②pain score no increase and decrease of ≥ 25% in OMED), pain progression (PP: ①≥ 2 increase in pain score with no decrease in OMED; ②≥ 1 increase in pain score with ≥ 25% increase in OMED) and indeterminate response (IR: cases not classified as CR / PR / PP).

Subjects in which complete or partial relief of pain was achieved were pain responders; Subjects whose pain progressed or was indeterminate response were non responders. The response rate of average pain = ((CR+PR) / No. of subjects) *100%.

week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The changes of pain and inference scores in Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
week 4, week 8, week 12
Quality of life measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 score
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is an integrated system for assessing the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional and Social Functioning); three symptom scales (Fatigue, Pain and Nausea/Vomiting); and a Global Health Status/QoL scale. Six single item scales are also included (Dyspnoea, Insomnia, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhoea and Financial Difficulties). Scale scores were calculated by averaging items within scales and transforming average scores linearly. All of the scales range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning whereas a high score for a symptom scale or item represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
week 4, week 8, week 12
The changes of tri-lineage cell counts in blood
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
week 4, week 8, week 12
The changes of frequency of breakthrough pain within 1 week
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
week 4, week 8, week 12
The changes of OMED on assessment days
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
The daily oral morphine equivalent dose over the past 24 h will be recorded for both groups at each testing time point. Equivalent morphine dose conversions will be established in accordance with the NCCN clinical practice guidelines for adult cancer pain (version 3.2022). For instance, fentanyl transdermal patch (25 mcg/h) will be considered approximately equal to oxycodone (30 mg/d), parenteral morphine (20 mg/d), and oral morphine (60 mg/d).
week 4, week 8, week 12
The changes in mood scale scores of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
HAM-D is a standardized scale for the measurement of the severity of depressive symptoms, initially designed to yield a total score based on 17 items. The scores of anxiety/depression and its change during the previous 2 weeks from baseline will be recorded.The total score > 24 points, severe depression. 17≤ score ≤24, moderate depression. 7≤ score ≤17, mild depression. < 7 points, no depressive symptoms.
week 4, week 8, week 12
The changes in mood scale scores of Hamilton Rating Scale for Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A)
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12
HAM-A is one of the most widely used rating scales to measure the severity of perceived anxiety symptoms. A total of 14 items were included 14 items. The total score ≥29 points, may be severe anxiety. ≥21 points, there must be obvious anxiety. ≥14 points, must have anxiety. ≥7 points, may have anxiety. < 7 points, no anxiety symptoms.
week 4, week 8, week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yi Liang, PhD, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021ZZ017 (Other Grant/Funding Number: the Key Foundation of Chinese Medicine Research Program of Zhejiang Province)
  • 2014KYA162 (Other Grant/Funding Number: General Research Plan of Medicine and Health of Zhejiang Province)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation

Subscribe