Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Meniscal Preservation Surgery

February 19, 2024 updated by: Andrews Research & Education Foundation

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Meniscal Preservation Surgery to Correct Meniscal Extrusion

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of surgical meniscal preservation techniques to correct meniscal extrusion. The primary endpoint for safety will be analysis of the total number and types of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). The primary endpoint for efficacy will include analysis of patient report outcome measures (PROMs).

H0 - Participants undergoing surgical meniscal preservation to correct meniscal extrusion will not exhibit a limited number of safety events nor have favorable outcomes.

H1- Participants undergoing surgical meniscal preservation to correct meniscal extrusion will exhibit a limited number of safety events and have favorable outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Treatment for meniscal extrusion varies on a patient-by-patient basis as it is generally dependent on the underlying cause of the extrusion. Extrusion should be detected early and treated appropriately. If left untreated irreversible loss of articular cartilage can ensue leading ultimately to osteoarthritis (OA). Meniscal extrusion is not commonly seen in isolation, but rather in association with meniscal tears or OA. Statistically speaking, the most common meniscal pathology associated with extrusion is posterior horn tearing. The goal of surgery with these two diagnoses is to debride and repair the root tear but also to correct the extrusion. Ignoring the extrusion while only fixing the root tear will increases the patient's chances of developing OA in the future. Surgeries repairing larger tears such as radial tears should also look to correct the noted extrusion and restore overall function for long-term patient meniscal health. The primary operative means of treatment for meniscal extrusion relies on centralization of the extruded meniscus. Centralization refers to the restoration of the meniscus to its native position on the tibial plateau. Ozeki et al. looked to accomplish centralization of extruded medial menisci via the pull-out suture technique. Koga et al noted significant positive outcomes in a prospective study on patients undergoing lateral meniscal centralization. This technique involved placing suture anchors on the edge of the tibial plateau with suture loops passing through the meniscocapsular junction. After the anchor knots were placed, the body of the meniscus was then centralized and stabilized in its anatomic position thereby restoring proper meniscal function. Surgical techniques for the treatment of meniscal extrusion continue to advance and represent areas of future investigation.

As previously mentioned, meniscal injury and meniscal extrusion are prevalent amongst middle-aged and elderly people and represent one of the most important risk factors for the development of OA. After failing conservative treatment options, knee replacement is the surgical intervention utilized by orthopaedic surgeons to treat pain and loss of function associated with OA. According to data published by Blue Cross Blue Shield, the average cost associated with an inpatient total knee replacement (TKR) is $30,249. With estimates that 3.5 million TKR surgeries will be performed annually in the United States by 2040, healthcare costs associated with OA are likely to continue to rise without the development of new treatment methods.

Advances in the treatment of previously irreparable meniscal injuries and the identification of meniscal pathology provide potential measures to delay the onset of OA. Reduction in the prevalence of OA will lead to decreased annual spending on healthcare costs associated with OA and TKR. Reduction in the prevalence of OA will also improve productivity in the workforce as well as keeping non workers active in enjoying the many outdoor recreational activities in the state of Florida. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of patients undergoing surgical meniscal preservation to correct meniscal extrusion.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States, 32561
        • Recruiting
        • Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Steve Jordan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Andrews Institute physicians' practices

Description

Inclusion Criteria Patients 18 years or older who are scheduled to have arthroscopic knee surgery to correct meniscal extrusion and preserve the meniscus by one of the investigating physicians will be screened for participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria will include:

  • Participants requiring surgery for either anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction
  • Participants with a history of an autoimmune disease
  • Participants with a history of diabetes
  • Participants with a history of a blood/clotting disorder
  • Participants with a history of previous surgery on the injured knee
  • Participants with advanced knee OA or excessive knee malalignment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Core Treatment Group
This is the only group in this study. Participants will receive full standard of care meniscal repair, followed by assessment interventions- ultrasound, MRI, and physical assessment to document healing progress. Participants will return for standard of care post-operative visits with the physician- 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation is performed- at which point the aforementioned interventions will be completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-Pain and Functioning Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-op timepoint
PROMIS Pain and Functioning Questionnaire used in this study to to assess overall health functioning and rehabilitation levels of each participant
6 weeks post-op timepoint
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-Pain and Functioning Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 6 months post-op timepoint
PROMIS Pain and Functioning Questionnaire used in this study to to assess overall health functioning and rehabilitation levels of each participant
6 months post-op timepoint
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-Pain and Functioning Questionnaire)
Time Frame: 12 months post-op timepoint
PROMIS Pain and Functioning Questionnaire used in this study to to assess overall health functioning and rehabilitation levels of each participant
12 months post-op timepoint
Ultrasound
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-op timepoint
US is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging modality that allows the physician to assess anatomic structures of the knee such as the meniscus. The meniscotibbital ligament lesion(MTLL) will be measured using ultrasound.
6 weeks post-op timepoint
Ultrasound
Time Frame: 6 months post-op timepoint
US is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging modality that allows the physician to assess anatomic structures of the knee such as the meniscus. The meniscotibbital ligament lesion(MTLL) will be measured using ultrasound.
6 months post-op timepoint
Ultrasound
Time Frame: 12 months post-op timepoint
US is a non-invasive and cost-effective imaging modality that allows the physician to assess anatomic structures of the knee such as the meniscus. The meniscotibbital ligament lesion(MTLL) will be measured using ultrasound.
12 months post-op timepoint

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 16, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Meniscal Extrusion

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meniscal Extrusion

Subscribe