Overlapping Pain Trajectory Study (COPC)

August 20, 2024 updated by: Christopher D. King, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Disrupted Spatial and Temporal Nociceptive Filtering in Adolescents With and Risk for Overlapping Pain Conditions

The goal of this observational study is to learn about spatial and temporal nociceptive filtering in adolescents with chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. If spatial and temporal filtering of nociceptive information is disrupted in youth with COPCs compared with youth with localized pain conditions and healthy controls.
  2. If disrupted nociceptive processing at baseline is associated with the transition from a single localized pain condition to COPCs in youth.

Participation includes:

  • quantitative sensory testing
  • blood draw
  • sleep assessment
  • questionnaires

Study Overview

Detailed Description

While localized primary pain conditions are prevalent in youth, a significant subset of these patients experience multiple pain conditions and meet the criteria for chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). COPCs have a marked negative impact on daily functioning and quality of life in youth and carry a high risk for continued pain and disability into adulthood. The underlying factors contributing to the development and persistence of COPCs in youth are unknown. The current proposal offers an innovative and previously unexplored approach to determine whether disruptions in spatial (concurrent noxious stimuli across the body) and temporal (noxious stimuli presented over time) filtering of nociceptive processing, reflecting pain amplification (e.g., increased facilitation and/or reduced inhibition), contribute to COPCs. Several quantitative sensory testing methods are uniquely positioned to probe disruptions in nociceptive filtering across spatial (spatial summation, SS; conditioned pain modulation, CPM) and temporal (temporal summation, TS; offset analgesia, OFA) domains. Our recent pilot studies found evidence for greater disruptions in spatial (CPM) and temporal (TS) filtering in youth with COPCs. Our primary objective is to determine if spatial and temporal filtering of nociceptive information differentiates youth with COPCs from those with localized pain and healthy controls and determine whether distinct profiles of disrupted nociceptive processing are associated with the transition of localized pain to COPCs. To accomplish this, the current study will leverage expertise and a vast clinical infrastructure (Migraine, Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and Pain Management clinics) at a large pediatric medical center to enroll 140 youth with a localized pain condition (migraine, abdominal pain, local MSK), and 140 youth with COPC's. 140 healthy youth will also recruited to serve as a control group. Following initial phenotyping to delineate disruptions in spatial and temporal dimensions of nociceptive processing (Aim 1), participants will be assessed for changes in pain status (localized to COPCs) every three months for one year (Aim 2). In Aim 1, it is hypothesized that youth with COPCs will show disrupted spatial (reflected by reduced CPM and enhanced SS) and temporal (reflected by enhanced TS and reduced OFA) processing compared to youth with localized pain and healthy controls. These findings will delineate specific disruptions of nociceptive processing in patients with COPCs. For Aim 2, it is hypothesized that a subset of youth with localized pain and disrupted spatial and temporal filtering will develop COPCs. The stability of spatial and temporal filtering will be examined at clinically relevant time points. The investigators will also explore whether other factors, including concomitant treatments, influence the disrupted filtering and the transition to COPCs. Our research will provide the first insight into the presence and impact of disrupted nociceptive filtering related to COPCs and its naturalistic progression from localized pain. This information will be critical in identifying risk patterns that can be useful in the prevention of progression to COPCs and mitigating long-term risk.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

420

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Recruiting
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher D King, Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 17 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adolescents with localized and overlapping pain conditions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. General Criteria

    • Access to the internet either by laptop, tablet, or phone (for REDCap Surveys)
    • English-speaking
    • Parent or guardian willing to comply with protocol, complete study assessments, and provide written informed consent
  2. Control Specific Criteria

    • No history/active chronic pain
  3. Patient Specific Criteria

    • Patients will need a diagnosis of a chronic pain derived congruent with ICD-11 criteria related to headache (migraine, daily headache), abdominal (FAPD), localized MSK (single limb/joint, low back or chest pain), or diffuse MSK (widespread MSK pain)
    • If on medications, they need to be on stable doses of prescribed pain and/or psychiatric medications for 4 weeks before the baseline study visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. General Criteria

    • Skin conditions (e.g., eczema) or past skin damage on the arms and legs in or near sites of sensory testing
    • Any comorbid rheumatic disease (e.g., arthritis, lupus), neurological (e.g., epilepsy, traumatic brain injury) or medical condition (e.g., cancer, diabetes)
  2. Control Specific Criteria

    • Taking medications that can alter pain sensitivity (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids, stimulants, anticonvulsants; psychiatric)
  3. Patient Specific Criteria

    • Present psychiatric disease as defined by DSM IV (e.g. psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder), alcohol or drug dependence, or documented developmental delays or impairments (e.g., autism, cerebral palsy, ADHD, or mental retardation) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements or safe participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Chronic Pain - Localized
Patients with localized pain conditions (n=140)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical and heat pain sensitivity by a contralateral conditioning stimulus (cold immersion). This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Offset analgesia (OFA) procedure evaluates the disproportionate change in heat pain sensitivity after a slight decrease in stimulus intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Spatial summation (SS) procedure evaluates the change in heat pain sensitivity when applying two painful stimuli simultaneously compared to one stimulus alone. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.
Temporal summation (TS) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical pain sensitivity after exposure to a series of noxious stimuli of the same intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.
Chronic Pain - Overlapping
Patients with two or more pain conditions (n=140)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical and heat pain sensitivity by a contralateral conditioning stimulus (cold immersion). This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Offset analgesia (OFA) procedure evaluates the disproportionate change in heat pain sensitivity after a slight decrease in stimulus intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Spatial summation (SS) procedure evaluates the change in heat pain sensitivity when applying two painful stimuli simultaneously compared to one stimulus alone. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.
Temporal summation (TS) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical pain sensitivity after exposure to a series of noxious stimuli of the same intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.
Healthy Participants
Health Participants without a chronic pain condition (n=140)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical and heat pain sensitivity by a contralateral conditioning stimulus (cold immersion). This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Offset analgesia (OFA) procedure evaluates the disproportionate change in heat pain sensitivity after a slight decrease in stimulus intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates inhibitory pain modulation processes.
Spatial summation (SS) procedure evaluates the change in heat pain sensitivity when applying two painful stimuli simultaneously compared to one stimulus alone. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.
Temporal summation (TS) procedure evaluates the change in mechanical pain sensitivity after exposure to a series of noxious stimuli of the same intensity. This psychophysical paradigm investigates facilitatory pain modulation processes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Profile (Pressure)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
-CPM is defined by the change in pressure thresholds (increase) before and during cold immersion. Pressure thresholds will be measured using an algometer.
Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Profile (Heat)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
-CPM is defined by the change in heat pain intensity (decrease) before and during cold immersion. Heat stimuli will be delivered by a thermode and pain intensity measured by participant self report on the visual analog scale.
Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Offset Analgesia (OA) Profile
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
OFA is defined by the change in heat pain intensity (decrease) after a slight reduction in stimulus intensity (1 Deg C). Heat stimuli will be delivered by a thermode and pain intensity measured continuously during stimuli by participant self report on the computerized visual analog scale.
Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Temporal Summation (TS) Profile
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
TS is defined by the change in mechanical pain intensity (increase) after exposure to a series of pinprick stimuli. Pain intensity will be measured by participant self report on the visual analog scale.
Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
Spatial Summation (SS) Profile
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months
SS is defined by the change (increase) in heat pain intensity between two simultaneously applied thermodes compared to one stimulus thermode only. Pain intensity will be measured by participant self report on the visual analog scale.
Baseline, 3 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Discussing options with IRB.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Conditioned Pain Modulation

Subscribe