Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of the Omega System for the Treatment of LUTS Due to BPH (Omega)

August 4, 2025 updated by: ProArc Medical

Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy the Omega System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

This is a prospective, two-stage, multi-center, pilot clinical study to evaluate the safety/tolerability/efficacy of the Omega System device. The Omega arc-shaped implant is inserted by the Omega delivery system into the prostate tissue of subjects to relieve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The study will first evaluate the Omega system on patients undergoing prostatectomy, which is not indicated for the device.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Recruiting
        • JSC L.Managadze National Center of Urology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ambrosi Pertia, Dr
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Recruiting
        • Israeli-Georgian Medical Research Clinic Healthycore
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Levan Donadze, Dr
      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159
        • Recruiting
        • N(N)LE New Vision University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexandre Khuskivadze, Dr
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Recruiting
        • Tbilisi Heart Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shalva Mshvildadze, Dr
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Terminated
        • Todua Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Stage 1

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male ≥50 years of age and ≤ 80 years old.
  2. Will undergo planned prostatectomy.
  3. Participant understands and is willing to the informed consent form.
  4. Prostate Volume between 30cc and 80cc.
  5. Prostate length ≥ 3cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to comply with the clinical protocol.
  2. Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
  3. Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure, such as:

    • Patient with coagulopathy due to medications or congenital condition - inability to stop taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets for at least 3 days prior to the procedure or coumadin for at least 5 days prior to the procedure (low dose aspirin therapy is not prohibited).
    • Use of alpha-blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
    • Use of 5-α-reductase inhibitors within 6 months of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
  4. American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
  5. Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
  6. Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
  7. Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
  8. Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy
  9. Current gross hematuria.
  10. Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.

Stage 2

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male ≥50 years old.
  2. Suspected symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  3. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13.
  4. Peak flow rate ≤ 12 ml/sec (with voided volume ≥ 125ml).
  5. Participant understands and is willing to the informed consent form.
  6. Prostate Volume between 30cc and 80cc.
  7. Prostate length ≥ 3cm and ≤ 5cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed or suspected prostate cancer. If suspected, prostate cancer must be ruled out.
  2. Concomitant participation in another interventional study.
  3. Unable to comply with the clinical protocol including all the follow-up requirements.
  4. Vulnerable population such as inmates or developmentally delayed individuals.
  5. Significant comorbidities which would affect study participation.
  6. Any medical condition or treatment, which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the procedure ,such as:

    • Use of concomitant medications (e.g., anticholinergics, antispasmodics, or antidepressants) affecting bladder function.
    • Patient with coagulopathy due to medications or congenital condition - inability to stop taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets for at least 3 days prior to the procedure or coumadin for at least 5 days prior to the procedure; low dose aspirin therapy not prohibited.
    • Alpha-blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation.
    • Taking 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) within 6 months (3 months for type II 5-ARI) of pre-treatment (baseline) evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued throughout the study).
    • Patient is taking steroids. [Note: Patients approved for the trial who are using the above medications will continue using them after the trial, except for Alpha blockers.]
  7. Previous prostate surgery such as: TURP, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate.
  8. Compromised renal function due to obstructive uropathy.
  9. Active Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).
  10. Obstructive or protruding median lobe.
  11. American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) > 3.
  12. Known neurogenic bladder or neurological disorders that might affect bladder or function.
  13. Recent myocardial infarction (less than three months).
  14. Concomitant bladder stones.
  15. Current gross hematuria.
  16. Active or history of epididymitis within the past 3 months.
  17. Presence of an artificial urinary sphincter or stent(s) in the urethra or prostate.
  18. Confirmed or suspected malignancy of bladder.
  19. History or presence of strictures in the anterior urethra or bladder neck contracture or detrusor muscle spasms.
  20. Other urethral conditions that may prevent insertion of Delivery Device into prostatic urethra.
  21. Bacterial prostatitis within the last 12 months.
  22. Previous rectal surgery, other than hemorrhoidectomy.
  23. Current uncontrolled diabetes (i.e., hemoglobin A1c ≥ 9%).
  24. Known allergy to nickel or titanium or stainless steel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Omega procedure

The ProArc Medical Omega system is a prostatic reshaping device. The Omega System is comprised of two main components: Omega Delivery Device and Omega Implant.

The delivery system uses a diathermy electrode to perform a circular and superficial incision through the urethral wall into the prostate tissue, into which the arc-shaped permanent implant is placed. The implant is made up of commonly used surgical implantable nitinol material, coated with Parylene coating. The implant expands the obstructed area, reducing the fluid obstruction through the prostatic urethra.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
Time Frame: 12 Months
Incidence and severity of procedural and device related adverse events.
12 Months
Primary Safety (Stage 2) - Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Incidence of post-operative catheterization after 7 days, up to 14 days.
2 weeks
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Change in urinary related symptom
Time Frame: 3 Months
Improvement in urinary related symptoms as evidenced by at least 30% decrease in International Prostate Symptom Score (A score of 0-7 indicates mild symptoms, 8-19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20-35 indicates severe symptoms)
3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and orientation of Omega implant in the prostate before prostatectomy is as planned: Yes/No
Time Frame: Procedure day
Evaluating whether the outcome of the Omega implant's location and orientation turned out as the surgeon planned prior to the Omega procedure.
Procedure day
Functionality (Stage 1) - Location and depth Omega incision in the excised prostate is as planned: Yes/No.
Time Frame: Procedure day
Evaluating whether the Omega incision location and depth outcome turned out as the surgeon planned prior to the Omega procedure.
Procedure day
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement of peak urinary flow rate as evidenced by an increase of at least 25% in uroflowmetry Qmax
Time Frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in post-void residual (PVR) test
Time Frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Incidence of inflammation, assessed by cystoscope
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Exploratory - Omega coverage assessed by cystoscope
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Usability (Stage 1 and Stage 2) - Evaluate the usability of the device and entire process
Time Frame: Procedure day
Evaluate the usability of the device and the entire process using the usability questionnaire (The highest score of 60 indicates that the device is extremely user-friendly, while the lowest score of 12 indicates that the device is very difficult to use)
Procedure day
Efficacy (Stage 2) - Improvement in urinary related symptoms
Time Frame: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Evaluate the improvement in urinary-related symptoms as evidenced by a decrease of at least 30% in the IPSS score. (A score of 0-7 indicates mild symptoms, 8-19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20-35 indicates severe symptoms)
1 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in PSA compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 Months, 6 Months and 12 Months
1 Months, 6 Months and 12 Months
Exploratory - Change in sexual function assessments from screening to 3, 6 and 12 months using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Function (MSHQ-EjD).
Time Frame: 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months

The IIEF-15 score ranges from 6 to 75 and is used to classify erectile dysfunction (ED).

An MSHQ-EjD score of 20 indicates the absence of ejaculatory dysfunction, while a score of 0 indicates a high level of ejaculatory dysfunction.

3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Exploratory - Change in VAS pain score
Time Frame: Procedure day, 1-2 weeks and 1 month
A VAS pain score of (0-1 mm) indicates no pain,(2-4 mm) - mild pain, (4-7 mm) - moderate pain, and (7-10 mm) - severe pain.
Procedure day, 1-2 weeks and 1 month
Exploratory - Change in the BPHII score from Baseline
Time Frame: 1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
1 Months, 3 Months, 6 Months and 12 months
Incidence of repeat invasive treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) or increase in dosage or initiation of new medication to treat symptoms of BPH
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Incidence of Device removal
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Frank Mastandrea, Dr, Board Member and Medical Director

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 3, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Omega device

Subscribe