HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision for Vietnamese MSM

January 13, 2026 updated by: Mahidol University
Although global rates of HIV infection have decreased overall, rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Southeast Asia are increasing. A recent review of available global data and the molecular epidemiology of HIV among MSM in Southeast Asia suggests that targeted interventions for MSM populations are necessary to reduce HIV incidence in the region. For example, in Vietnam's urban centers, the HIV epidemic among MSM is growing rapidly, with an estimated prevalence of 17% in Ho Chi Minh City and an estimated incidence of 5.8% among young men who have sex with men in Hanoi. Behavioral epidemiology has also been well-described, with high rates of unprotected sex, multiple concurrent partners, untreated STIs, and poor engagement in the HIV care continuum, including low rates of HIV testing, all contributing to high levels of circulating virus among MSM risk networks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

HIV rates among MSM in Vietnam have increased sharply since 2006. By 2011, rates had reached 19%, with HCMC accounting for the largest number of infections. MSM, particularly YMSM, continue to have low rates of HIV testing and poor engagement in HIV care. Studies have identified various risk factors, including low knowledge and perceived risk, sexual risk and STIs/HIV, complexity in identity and meaning, substance use and mental health, limited HIV interventions, and poor engagement in health services. Increasing HIV testing among MSM, particularly YMSM, is crucial for early detection and enrolment in ART. However, individual and institutional-level barriers hinder testing, such as poor knowledge, stigma, and poor repeat testing. Using the internet as an intervention platform can reach and engage MSM who cannot be reached using conventional health-engagement approaches.

The proposed study aims to adapt and pilot test an online HIV testing intervention (OHT) targeted at young men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The OHT intervention was developed and successfully implemented among MSM in Thailand, showing significant impacts on testing rates and linkage to HIV care. The proposed study builds on longstanding collaborations between HIV researchers from Mahidol University in Thailand and a local community-based organization that serves YMSM in Vietnam. The findings from the proposed study will have important implications for assessing the potential for OHT intervention to overcome profound and longstanding barriers to HIV testing among YMSM in Vietnam, an outcome that if brought to scale could significantly improve enrolment in ART and reduce HIV incidence. Innovative strategies to increase testing and improve continuum will be needed to reduce HIV transmission in Vietnam, where little data is available on uptake of HIV testing among Vietnamese MSM, and a high proportion of men who have sex with men surveyed have never been voluntarily tested for HIV. HIV self-testing with online supervision represents an important strategy to improve scale-up of HIV testing among Vietnamese MSM. The proposed OHT can overcome the barrier of face-to-face testing and counseling, while ensuring that Vietnamese YMSM receive real-time guidance and support for self-testing and linkage to care and treatment, if positive.

The project's aims are: (1) to conduct a qualitative study with Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to identify potential barriers and facilitators to the uptake of OHT among YMSM in HCMC; (2) to conduct a quantitative study with online survey questionnaires to adapt the existing Thai OHT intervention for use among YMSM in Vietnam, including translation and socio-cultural refinement of testing kits, clip video content, online pre-and post-test counseling, and broader socio-cultural contexts. Data from Aim 1 will be analyzed and used to design the test kit, the clip video content, and when and how the HIV counselor will conduct pre-and post-test counseling. Moreover, willingness to engage in OHT as well as factors related to sustained testing will be collected through an online survey, and (3) to conduct a pilot study with Randomized Control Trial to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted OHT intervention, including the use of an HIV rapid diagnostic antibody/antigen-based self-testing with an HIV counselor through video conferencing. YMSM recruited through the online survey who indicated an interest in OHT will be randomly selected to the OHT group or the venue-based testing group (standard of care), using repeated measures at 6 and 12 months to compare HIV testing rates and behavioral outcomes because of retention and we need to understand how the socio-cultural factors affecting to OHT retention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 700000
        • Center for Applied Research on Men and Health (CARMAH)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 29 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16-29 years at cohort baseline
  • Self-reported male gender
  • Self-reported having had anal sex with another man in the past 12 months
  • Speak, read and write Vietnamese
  • Vietnamese citizenship
  • Resident of the assessment city (Ho Chi Minh City) for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not consent to HIV self-testing with online supervision
  • Not willing to give contact information for follow-up assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HIV self-testing with online supervision
A pilot study to assess the feasibility of HIV self-testing with online supervision
Other: Control
venue-based HIV testing
venue-based HIV testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at Baseline
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Assessed at baseline
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 6 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Assessed at 6 months
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 12 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Assessed at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at Baseline
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Assessed at baseline
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 6 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Assessed at 6 months
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 12 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Assessed at 12 months
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at Baseline
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Assessed at baseline
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 6 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Assessed at 6 months
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 12 Months
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Assessed at 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas E Guadamuz, PhD, Mahidol University
  • Study Chair: Giang M Le, MD, Hanoi Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R34MH123337 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on HIV self-testing with online supervision

Subscribe