- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05805384
Evaluating a Noise Reduction Algorithm With Cochlear Implant Users
December 15, 2025 updated by: NYU Langone Health
In this study, a noise reduction algorithm will be implemented in various listening situations to evaluate its effectiveness in improving speech understanding for cochlear implant users ages 12 and older.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Natalia Stupak
- Phone Number: 646-501-4153
- Email: natalia.stupak@nyulangone.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: David M. Landsberger
- Phone Number: 212-263-8455
- Email: David.landsberger@nyulangone.com
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- Recruiting
- Tisch Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 12 years of age.
- Be post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients with at least 6 months experience regardless of manufacturer.
- The PI must also deem the child to be developmentally able to complete the experiments.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Anyone who is not a cochlear implant user or is aged under 12 years.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cochlear Implant Users
Participants will complete up to 4 experiments evaluating the use of the Speech Enhancement using Dynamic thresholding Approach (SEDA) algorithm.
Each testing session will take between 4-6 hours to complete.
Testing sessions will continue until the completion of the experiments.
|
Speech Enhancement using Dynamic thresholding Approach (SEDA) is a software algorithm that removes background noise.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions with SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions while using the SEDA Noise Reduction (NR) algorithm.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions without NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions without SEDA NR.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions with SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quiet listening conditions while using the SEDA NR.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions without NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quiet listening conditions with SEDA NR.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Rating of SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.2)
|
Participants will be presented with two buttons: one button will play a sample with SEDA NR and the other will play a sample without SEDA NR.
Listeners will report which sample was preferable by clicking on a horizontal visual analog scale (VAS).
VAS ratings will be scored on a scale of -10 to 10 where positive numbers indicate a preference for SEDA NR and negative numbers indicate a preference for not using SEDA NR.
The magnitude of the absolute value of the score indicates the strength of the preference.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.2)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions with Clinical NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions while using a clinical NR algorithm.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions with Clinical NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quite listening conditions while using a clinical NR algorithm.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with no SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized without SEDA NR.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Standard SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with Standard SEDA NR.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Low-Computation SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with the Low-Computation SEDA NR, which is designed to have minimal computation while maintaining an Extended Short-Time Objective Intelligibility Predictor (ESTOI) value similar to the "standard" SEDA implementation
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
|
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Very Low-Computation SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard.
This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with the Very Low-Computation SEDA NR, which is designed to have a reasonable ESTOI value with minimal computational requirements.
|
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David M. Landsberger, NYU Langone Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 23, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
April 10, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 17, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 15, 2025
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-00815
- SB1DC018761 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health.
Requests may be directed to: David.landsberger@nyulangone.com.
The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov
only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The investigator who proposed to use the data will be granted access upon reasonable request.
Requests should be directed to David.landsberger@nyulangone.com.
To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Impairment
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMed-El CorporationCompletedHigh Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Impairment | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkInnovation Fund Denmark; William Demant FondenRecruitingHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Impairment, SensorineuralDenmark
-
CochlearTerminatedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralArgentina
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedHearing Impairment, Conductive | Deafness Unilateral | Hearing Impaired (Partially)Denmark
-
CochlearAvaniaCompletedHearing Impairment, SensorineuralAustralia
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCochlear; Stiftung Besser HörenTerminatedHearing-ImpairmentSwitzerland
-
University College, LondonCompletedFrequency Compression | Severe-profound Hearing Impairment
-
King Saud UniversityRecruitingNutrition, Healthy | Profound Hearing ImpairmentSaudi Arabia