Evaluating a Noise Reduction Algorithm With Cochlear Implant Users

December 15, 2025 updated by: NYU Langone Health
In this study, a noise reduction algorithm will be implemented in various listening situations to evaluate its effectiveness in improving speech understanding for cochlear implant users ages 12 and older.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • Tisch Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 12 years of age.
  • Be post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients with at least 6 months experience regardless of manufacturer.
  • The PI must also deem the child to be developmentally able to complete the experiments.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Anyone who is not a cochlear implant user or is aged under 12 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cochlear Implant Users
Participants will complete up to 4 experiments evaluating the use of the Speech Enhancement using Dynamic thresholding Approach (SEDA) algorithm. Each testing session will take between 4-6 hours to complete. Testing sessions will continue until the completion of the experiments.
Speech Enhancement using Dynamic thresholding Approach (SEDA) is a software algorithm that removes background noise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions with SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions while using the SEDA Noise Reduction (NR) algorithm.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions without NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions without SEDA NR.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions with SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quiet listening conditions while using the SEDA NR.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions without NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quiet listening conditions with SEDA NR.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Rating of SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.2)
Participants will be presented with two buttons: one button will play a sample with SEDA NR and the other will play a sample without SEDA NR. Listeners will report which sample was preferable by clicking on a horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). VAS ratings will be scored on a scale of -10 to 10 where positive numbers indicate a preference for SEDA NR and negative numbers indicate a preference for not using SEDA NR. The magnitude of the absolute value of the score indicates the strength of the preference.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 1.2)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Noisy Conditions with Clinical NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in noisy listening conditions while using a clinical NR algorithm.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized in Quiet Conditions with Clinical NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized in quite listening conditions while using a clinical NR algorithm.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 2)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with no SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized without SEDA NR.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Standard SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with Standard SEDA NR.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Low-Computation SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with the Low-Computation SEDA NR, which is designed to have minimal computation while maintaining an Extended Short-Time Objective Intelligibility Predictor (ESTOI) value similar to the "standard" SEDA implementation
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Percent of Words Correctly Recognized with Very Low-Computation SEDA NR
Time Frame: Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)
Participants will listen to sentences and repeat all the words they heard. This outcome measures the percent of words correctly recognized with the Very Low-Computation SEDA NR, which is designed to have a reasonable ESTOI value with minimal computational requirements.
Up to Year 2 (Completion of Experiment 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M. Landsberger, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Requests may be directed to: David.landsberger@nyulangone.com. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data will be granted access upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to David.landsberger@nyulangone.com. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Impairment

Subscribe