- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05831475
LEAPTogether: An Intergenerational Intervention to Address Loneliness and Social Isolation (LEAPTogether)
August 21, 2024 updated by: Allison Mays, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leveraging Exercise to Age in Place (LEAP) Together: An Intergenerational Intervention to Address Loneliness and Social Isolation
Older adult participants will engage in exercise videos twice a week for 8 weeks either while paired with a peer (same age group) or paired with a younger adult with the ability to simultaneously video chat while exercising.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participation in this study includes:
- Completing assessments at baseline (start of study), 8 weeks, and 16 weeks
- Initial meeting with an Exercise Physiologist to determine exercise interests and preferences
- Being matched with an exercise partner
- Virtually meeting with partner to engage in exercise videos via the FlexTogether platform (meet twice a week for a total of 8 weeks)
- Attend a live group class once a month
- Completing an exit interview
Primary Objective:
To assess feasibility by monitoring adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Secondary Objectives:
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through surveys and qualitative interviews
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (8 weeks post-intervention / 18 weeks on study) through surveys and qualitative interviews
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Allison M Mays, MD, MAS
- Phone Number: (310) 385-3511
- Email: Allison.Mays@cshs.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Nathalie Guevara
- Phone Number: 310-248-6242
- Email: nathalie.guevara@csmns.org
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
- Recruiting
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
-
Principal Investigator:
- Celina H Shirazipour, Ph.D.
-
Contact:
- Allison M Mays, MD, MAS
- Phone Number: 310-385-3511
- Email: allison.mays@cshs.org
-
Contact:
- Nathalie E Guevara
- Phone Number: 3102486242
- Email: nathalie.guevara@csmns.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Allison M Mays, MD,MAS
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sonja Rosen, MD,FACP,AGSF
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nathalie Guevara
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Bianca Luna-Luperico
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Verbal informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study
- Age 18-30 years for younger adults
- Age greater than or equal to 65 years for older adults
- Has access to a tablet, laptop, or desktop computer with video capabilities connected to the internet with a screen at least 13 inches across
- Able to read, write, and understand English
- Has a 5 x 6 foot space at home in which to exercise
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current diagnosis of dementia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Peer Pairings
Two older adults paired
|
Participants will be paired with someone of the same age group and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising.
Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Intergenerational Pairings
A younger adult and older adult paired
|
Participants will be paired with someone older/ younger and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising.
Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Time Frame: Attendance over 8-weeks
|
Adherence defined as attending at least 12 out of 16 sessions (70% attendance)
|
Attendance over 8-weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
social connectedness per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness in the short-term (pre-post) through Duke Social Support Index (min score- 11, max score- 33; higher score indicates higher social support and interaction).
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post loneliness per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to decrease loneliness in the short-term (pre-post) through UCLA Loneliness Survey (min score- 3, max score- 9; higher scores correspond to higher feelings of loneliness)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Mental Health Continuum Short-Form (min score- 14, max score- 84; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive well-being)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post expectations regarding aging per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Expectations Regarding Aging Survey (min score- 12, max score- 48; higher score indicates higher (positive) expectations of aging)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post generativity per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Baltimore Experience Corps Trial Generativity Scale (min score- 13, max score- 65; higher score indicates higher levels of generativity)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post physical activity per units in scale
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (min score- 0, max score- 24+; total of 14 or less indicates insufficient activity/sedentary lifestyle, 24 units or more indicates active lifestyle)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
pre/post physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
Time Frame: baseline and 10 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through 30 second sit to stand (how many times can the participant sit and stand without using their hands in a 30 second period, higher number indicates higher level of endurance)
|
baseline and 10 weeks
|
|
long-term social connectedness per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Duke Social Support Index (min score- 11, max score- 33; higher score indicates higher social support and interaction).
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term loneliness per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to decrease loneliness in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through UCLA Loneliness Survey (min score- 3, max score- 9; higher scores correspond to higher feelings of loneliness)
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term expectations regarding aging per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Expectations Regarding Aging Survey (min score- 12, max score- 48; higher score indicates higher (positive) expectations of aging)
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Mental Health Continuum Short-Form (min score- 14, max score- 84; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive well-being)
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term generativity per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e.
solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Baltimore Experience Corps Trial Generativity Scale (min score- 13, max score- 65; higher score indicates higher levels of generativity)
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term physical activity per units in scale
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (min score- 0, max score- 24+; total of 14 or less indicates insufficient activity/sedentary lifestyle, 24 units or more indicates active lifestyle)
|
18 weeks
|
|
long-term physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
Time Frame: 18 weeks
|
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through 30 second sit to stand (how many times can the participant sit and stand without using their hands in a 30 second period, higher number indicates higher level of endurance)
|
18 weeks
|
|
Key social pairing components in virtual programming
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Qualitative interview to capture any other thoughts and observations from participants that are not easily captured in surveys
|
10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Celina H Shirazipour, Ph.D., Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Principal Investigator: Allison M Mays, MD, MAS, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Principal Investigator: Sonja Rosen, MD, FACP, AGSF, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):290-4. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11.
- Perissinotto CM, Stijacic Cenzer I, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1078-83. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993.
- Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5797-801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
- Tiwari SC. Loneliness: A disease? Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;55(4):320-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.120536. No abstract available.
- Ronzi S, Orton L, Pope D, Valtorta NK, Bruce NG. What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 30;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2.
- Teater B. Intergenerational Programs to Promote Active Aging: The Experiences and Perspectives of Older Adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 2016/01/02 2016;40(1):1-19. doi:10.1080/01924788.2016.1127041
- Peters R, Ee N, Ward SA, Kenning G, Radford K, Goldwater M, Dodge HH, Lewis E, Xu Y, Kudrna G, Hamilton M, Peters J, Anstey KJ, Lautenschlager NT, Fitzgerald A, Rockwood K. Intergenerational Programmes bringing together community dwelling non-familial older adults and children: A Systematic Review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 May-Jun;94:104356. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104356. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
- Kim Y, Kim J, Lee JM, Seo DC, Jung HC. Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095247.
- Rizzo N. Fitness Industry Statistics 2021-2028 [Market Research]. 2021. https://runrepeat.com/fitness-industry
- Koenig HG, Westlund RE, George LK, Hughes DC, Blazer DG, Hybels C. Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics. 1993 Jan-Feb;34(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71928-3.
- Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and Validation of a Functional Fitness Test for Community-Residing Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 01 Apr. 1999 1999;7(2):129-161. doi:10.1123/japa.7.2.129
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 7, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 25, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
April 26, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 22, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 21, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00001980
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Loneliness
-
Chinese University of Hong KongThe Salvation Army, Hong Kong and Macau CommandNot yet recruiting
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
University of OregonNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); HopeLab FoundationCompleted
-
University Hospital, BonnThe German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development; Prof...Unknown
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompleted
-
Education University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
Education University of Hong KongThe University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
University College, LondonUniversity of Manchester; National Academy for Social Prescribing; We Do WellbeingActive, not recruiting
-
University of RochesterNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
Clinical Trials on Peer Virtual Paired Exercise
-
King's College LondonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; MND Association; Marie Curie CharityCompletedMotor Neuron Disease | Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisUnited Kingdom
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompleted
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompletedJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisCanada
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompleted
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedDepressive Disorder | DepressionUnited States
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalDeborah Munroe Noonan Memorial Research FundActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy | Spina BifidaUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Kenyatta National HospitalActive, not recruitingPlanning the mPACT Trial - mHealth Strategies for the Pediatric to Adult HIV Care Transition (mPACT)Transition From Pediatric to Adult HIV CareKenya
-
Ankara UniversityUniversity of DelawareCompletedPregnancy | SexualityTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompletedPsychological | Adolescent - Emotional Problem | Agent | ConversationalChina