General Exercises With and Without TA Contraction in Patients With Nonspecific Acute LBP

April 30, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie, Ahram Canadian University

General Exercises With and Without TA Contraction in Patients With Nonspecific Acute LBP: A Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercises to treat patients with nonspecific acute low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Non-specific low back pain affects people of all ages and is a leading contributor to disease burden worldwide. Management consists of education and reassurance, analgesic medicines, non-pharmacological therapies, and timely review. The clinical course of low back pain is often favourable; thus, many patients require little if any formal medical care. Two treatment strategies are currently used, a stepped approach beginning with more simple care that is progressed if the patient does not respond, and the use of simple risk prediction methods to individualise the amount and type of care provided. Motor control exercises, which advocate the contraction of the TrA have shown some efficacy for patients with chronic low back pain. However, the validity of this strategy for patients with acute LBP is unclear.

HYPOTHESES: there will be no significant effect of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercise than general exercise alone in patients with non-specific acute low back pain.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a statistically significant effect of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercise on outcomes of patients with non-specific acute low back pain?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt, 3221405
        • Recruiting
        • Outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Ahram Canadian University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals of both sexes
  2. Aged between 18 and 50 years
  3. Acute nonspecific low back pain according to The most recent guidelines for the diagnosis and management of NSLBP come from the American College of Physicians and were published in 2017. According to these guidelines, the diagnosis of acute NSLBP should be made based on the following criteria:

Acute onset of low back pain, defined as pain lasting for less than 12 weeks No specific identifiable cause of the pain (e.g., infection, malignancy, fracture, inflammatory disorder) No radicular symptoms (e.g., pain radiating down the leg) No significant neurological deficits or findings on physical examination (e.g., loss of reflexes or muscle strength)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Serious low back pathology
  2. Contraindications to exercise therapy
  3. Neurological signs (leg weakness)
  4. Specific spinal pathology (e.g., malignancy, or inflammatory joint or bone disease)
  5. Prior back surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: General Exercises
This exercise activates paravertebral and abdominal muscles. Because this exercise impose extra loading on the spinal tissues, the general exercise was selected on the basis of maximizing the contraction benefit/spinal loading ratio.
General exercise is a structured exercise program designed to help individuals with back pain improve their fitness levels. The program comprises of a series of exercise classes that are led by a physiotherapist. The classes involve a combination of aerobic, strength, and flexibility exercises, and aim to improve overall physical fitness, reduce pain, and improve function. The program is specifically designed for individuals with back pain, and the exercises are tailored to meet the needs of each participant. The Back to Fitness Program is based on the principles of exercise prescription and is intended to be a safe and effective way to manage back pain through exercise.
Experimental: General exercises with TA contraction
This exercise activates paravertebral and abdominal muscles. Because this exercise impose extra loading on the spinal tissues, the general exercise was selected on the basis of maximizing the contraction benefit/spinal loading ratio. The patients will be asked to contract TA will doing these exercises.
General exercise is a structured exercise program designed to help individuals with back pain improve their fitness levels. The program comprises a series of exercise classes that are led by a physiotherapist. The classes involve a combination of aerobic, strength, and flexibility exercises, and aim to improve overall physical fitness, reduce pain, and improve function. The program is specifically designed for individuals with back pain, and the exercises are tailored to meet the needs of each participant. In addition to these exercises, the Back to Fitness Program includes the activation of the transverse abdominis muscle, which is an important stabilizing muscle in the core. The activation of this muscle is done through specific exercises and techniques, and is intended to improve core stability and reduce the risk of further back injuries.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity via numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: Changes in pain intensity at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge.
The primary outcome measure is pain intensity, which will be assessed using a numeric pain rating scale. Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain. Pain intensity will be measured at four time points: baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge. The change in pain intensity from baseline to each follow-up time point will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the Back to Fitness Program is effective in reducing pain intensity over time.
Changes in pain intensity at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time Frame: Changes at Pain pressure threshold at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge.
Pain pressure threshold is a measure of the minimum amount of pressure that causes pain in the affected area. It will be assessed using a pressure algometer.
Changes at Pain pressure threshold at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge.
Disability
Time Frame: Changes in Disability at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.
Disability will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, which is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses the impact of back pain on daily activities. The questionnaire includes 24 items that ask participants to rate their ability to perform various activities on a scale of 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Changes in Disability at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.
Global Perception Effect
Time Frame: changes in Global perception at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.
Global perception effect is a measure of the participant's overall perception of the effectiveness of the general exercise in reducing pain and improving function. It will be assessed using a single-item question that asks participants to rate their perception of the program's effectiveness on a scale of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater effectiveness.
changes in Global perception at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Amal Fawzy, Ph.d, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 012/004221

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) collected during this study will be available upon reasonable request. Requests for access to the data should be submitted via email to mohamed.elmeligie@acu.edu.eg. All requests will be reviewed by the study investigators to ensure that they are reasonable and consistent with the ethical principles of the study. Access to the data will be granted in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and with appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

During the trial and after 1 year of the end of trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

via email to mohamed.elmeligie@acu.edu.eg

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on General exercises

Subscribe