Service Development of POCUS in the IBD Clinic

December 10, 2024 updated by: University College, London

Does the Use of Point of Care Ultrasound During Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic Appointments Change Management, Speed up Treatment Decisions and Save Money: a Feasibility and Service Development Study

Study to determine whether the use of an ultrasound completed during an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic will speed up diagnosis, treatment initiation, reduce complications, save money and reduce investigations compared with our current standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

After being provided with study information and providing written informed consent, participants attending the inflammatory bowel disease clinic will be randomised to standard of care or to receiving an ultrasound during the clinic appointment. This ultrasound result will be used to determine treatment decisions. Participants will have a 6 month follow-up to capture outcome data and further medical record review will be conducted at one year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2PG
        • University College London Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16 years or above
  • Attending IBD clinic face-to-face
  • Able to give informed consent.
  • Belonging to one of the following groups:

    1. New patients with high clinical suspicion of IBD
    2. Known UC/IBD-U and possible flare
    3. Known Crohn's and possible flare
    4. Known IBD and assessing response to a new medication or following surgery
    5. Known IBD and clinician planning endoscopic or radiological investigations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory bowel disease limited to proctitis with no clinical suspicion of extension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Participant will follow standard of care
Experimental: Point-of-care Ultrasound
Participant will receive point-of-care ultrasound at time of clinic appointment and clinician will use result to inform treatment decision
Point-of-care ultrasound performed during clinic appointment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare time to definitive IBD-related treatment initiation with the use of POCUS compared to standard of care
Time Frame: 6 months
Time in days for when a new medication is started, dose changed, medication stopped, or surgery performed following the clinic appointment
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does point of care ultrasound change clinical decision making in the IBD clinic
Time Frame: Immediate
Does the clinical decision made before ultrasound differ from that following ultrasound.
Immediate
Compare sensitivity and specificity of POCUS to identify active disease with standard of care investigations (MRI, ultrasound, endoscopy)
Time Frame: 6 months
Using formalised imaging or endoscopy as gold standard for determining disease activity, compare findings on POCUS to determine sensitivity and specificity
6 months
Compare healthcare resource utilisation including outpatient appointments, need for further investigations and admissions in patients receiving POCUS or standard of care
Time Frame: 1 year
Using NHS cost tariffs, estimated costs for participants following standard of care to those receiving POCUS over the year following enrolment
1 year
Compare findings at POCUS when performed by a gastroenterologist or a radiologist
Time Frame: 6 months
POCUS will be performed by gastroenterologists or radiologist and outcomes on sensitivity/specificity will be compared between the two
6 months
Compare clinical disease activity scores when POCUS is used compared with standard of care
Time Frame: 6 months
Using disease activity score questionnaires (HBI (If Crohn's disease) or SCCAI (If ulcerative Colitis)) at baseline and six months.
6 months
Compare use of steroids with POCUS compared with standard of care
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of courses of steroids and total steroid dose over the duration of the trial
1 year
Compare haemaglobin levels when POCUS is used compared with standard of care
Time Frame: 6 months
Are there significant difference between the change in haemaglobin from baseline to six months in the POCUS group compared with standard of care
6 months
Compare CRP levels when POCUS is used compared with standard of care
Time Frame: 6 months
Are there significant difference between the change in CRP from baseline to six months in the POCUS group compared with standard of care
6 months
Compare Platelets when POCUS is used compared with standard of care
Time Frame: 6 months
Are there significant difference between the change in platelets from baseline to six months in the POCUS group compared with standard of care
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William Blad, BM BCh, University College London Hospitals Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Point-of-care ultrasound

Subscribe