Improvement of Gait by Spinal Stimulation in Patients With Postoperative Chronic Lumbosciatalgia: Pilot Study (GaitStim) (GAITSTIM)

February 6, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Study of the Improvement of Gait by Spinal Stimulation in Patients With Post-operative Chronic Lumbosciatalgia: Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to explore the changes in objective walking parameters induced by medullary stimulation in patients with Fail Back Surgery Syndrome, after chronic stimulation, in comparison with preoperative condition.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After the informed consent signature, a first assessment will be carried out, including: quantified analysis of walking (AQM), felt effort questionnaire, pain questionnaires, functional abilities, limitations, goals and quality of life.

The implantation of the spinal cord stimulation system will be performed in two stages: the first stage, the electrode alone will be implanted and connected to an external test stimulator, allowing a one-week stimulation test.

If the test is positive (EVA pain improvement > or = 50%), the second step will be to connect this electrode to a Spectra WaveWriter™ internal stimulator. This stimulator delivers three different stimulation modalities: tonic, microburst and high frequency. The activated initial stimulation mode will be the tonic one.

After 3 months of "tonic" stimulation, the patient will be treated successively and in random way by 3 other different stimulation modalities during a week: microburst, high frequency, stopped stimulation (Off). The AQM and the different questionnaires will be done again, which will determine which stimulation modality is most beneficial to the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 year old and < or = 70 year old
  • Patients with chronic neuropathic lumbo-sciatalgia (DN4 score > or = 4/10) as part of a moderate to severe spinal surgery failure syndrome (EVA >50/100), in who a collegial and multidisciplinary indication of medullary stimulation treatment was chosen.
  • Patients awith Social Security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable persons
  • Patients who are invalid and unable to perform a quantified walk analysis
  • Contraindication to surgery or anesthesia
  • Patient not able to complete questionnaires
  • Woman of childbearing age without effective contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: neurostimulation
3 months of tonic stimutaltion + 3 weeks with random stimulation mode between microburst, High frequency, stopped stimulation (Off) then stimulation with the more efficient mode (according the patient) until 6 monthe after implantation.
Test to measure anthropometry, joint amplitudes, muscle strength and spasticity of the lower limbs on a treadmill.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To explore the changes in objective walking parameters induced by spinal stimulation in patients with FBSS, after 6 months of chronic stimulation, in comparison with preoperative status.
Time Frame: At baseline, 3 and 6 months after implantation
Gait quantified analysis with Gait Deviation Index
At baseline, 3 and 6 months after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To describe the gait alteration in a population of patients with FBSS
Time Frame: At baseline, 3 and 6 months after implantation
Gait quantified analysis with Gait Deviation Index
At baseline, 3 and 6 months after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Clinical Trials on walking quantified analysis

Subscribe