Predictors of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Scoring Systems and Their Implications on the Outcomes , Sohag Experience.

May 11, 2023 updated by: Mahmoud Fahmy Mahmoud, Sohag University

Predictors of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Scoring Systems and Their Implications on the Outcomes, Sohag Experience.

laparoscopic cholecystectomy nowadays is the most common surgery done by General surgery surgeons , so it is necessary to evaluate the difficulty of each case prior to surgery and from the first look ,to avoid complications and improve outcomes , so scoring systems are needed for better assessment of the overall condition and make good decision .

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Alaa A Radwan, professor
  • Phone Number: 01001988455

Study Locations

      • Sohag, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Sohag University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Magdy M Amin, professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with symptomatic gall stones

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lap to open conversion due to equipment failure pregnancy common bile duct stone obstructive jaundice unfit for general anesthesia patients refusing lap cholecystectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Easy cholecystectomy
easy procedure with no complications
conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with calculation of difficulty scorings
Active Comparator: moderate severe cholecystectomy
moderate severity with prolonged time or complication .
conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with calculation of difficulty scorings
Active Comparator: difficult cholecystectomy
very prolonged time , complication or conversion to open cholecystectomy .
conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with calculation of difficulty scorings

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation and applicability of scoring systems
Time Frame: 6 months
the scoring system should reach high percentage to be applicable and could be used for scoring difficulty.A comparison between preoperative score and intraoperative score, then the success of a scoring system is by the high percentage sensitivity ,preoperative data sheet will be taken from all patients ,then the first look intraoperative will judge the score through multiple items , the cross matching will be done between the two scores. and to measure the results,There are many scoring system for example Randawa preoperative and intraoperative score , Nassar preoperative and intraoperative score ,matching the result of both preoperative and intraoperative will be done to validate each one. Randawa score classified into easy and moderate and severe difficulty based on time lapsed during cholycystectomy ,intraoperative problems and complications Nassar uses the intraoperative shape of gall bladder to classify the difficulty from 1 to 5 grades upon the first look to the gall bladder.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 18, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Soh-Med-23-03-14MS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Calculous Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Subscribe