Effects of Neural Mobilization on Respiratory Parameters in Chronic Neck Pain

July 30, 2024 updated by: Emine Atıcı, Okan University

Effects of Neural Mobilization on Respiratory Parameters, Pain, Range of Motion, and Neck Awareness in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: Neural mobilization (NM) is commonly used to treat nerve disorders, and it is useful for disorders associated with neck and arm pain. This study aimed to determine the effects of NM on respiratory function in patients with chronic neck pain.

Methods: Overall, 26 patients with neck pain were randomly assigned to two groups: NM or control. In these participants, respiratory function and active cervical range of motion were assessed before and after intervention. Furthermore, the participants were provided a visual analog scale (VAS) and Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ). Each participant underwent 15 treatment sessions (5 days per week for 3 weeks). Further, in the NM group, in addition to conventional treatment, 10 sessions of neural mobilization were performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kocaeli
      • Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey
        • Medical Park Gebze Hosptal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals aged 25-65 years,
  • those with neck pain for >3 months
  • those with complaints of pain, tension
  • numbness on neurodynamic nerve tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals with spinal stenosis,
  • neurological diagnosis, malignancy,
  • upper extremity vascular problems,
  • osteoporosis,
  • pregnancy,
  • history of newly repaired peripheral nerves,
  • inflammatory processes,
  • cervical spine and upper extremity surgeries,
  • conditions affecting lung capacity (such as asthma, bronchitis, and diabetes mellitus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neural Mobilization Group
Each participant underwent 15 treatment sessions (5 days per week for 3 weeks). Further, in the NM group, in addition to conventional treatment, 10 sessions of neural mobilization were performed.
Radial Nerve Mobilization, Medial Mobilization, Ulnar Mobilization
Experimental: Control Group
Each participant underwent 15 treatment sessions (5 days per week for 3 weeks).
Radial Nerve Mobilization, Medial Mobilization, Ulnar Mobilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: Change from baseline respiratory function at 3 weeks
PFTs were performed using a spirometer (Schiller SP-260). Spirometric measurements were obtained using a nasal clamp while the patient was in a sitting position. At least three measurements were obtained for each participant, and the best value was considered for the study. In PFT measurements, forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC values were compared between the two groups
Change from baseline respiratory function at 3 weeks
Range of Motion (ROM) of the Joint
Time Frame: Change from baseline ROM at 3 weeks
Participants' ROM of the neck was measured using a universal goniometer at baseline. The measurements for neck flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation were made during active neck movements while the patient was in a seating position. For the measurement of ROM during neck flexion and extension, the goniometer was placed on the acromion, and the ROM was measured by following the midline of the ear. To measure ROM during lateral flexion, the goniometer was placed on the spinous process of the cervical vertebra 7, and the ROM was measured by tracking its movement. For the measurement of ROM during rotation, the goniometer was placed in the center of the head, and the ROM was measured by following the nose. All measurements were reported in degrees.
Change from baseline ROM at 3 weeks
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain intensity at 3 weeks
Pain intensity was assessed using Visual Analog Scale. A description of the parameter being evaluated was written at either end of a 10-cm horizontal line, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). The participants were asked to choose the score that best described their pain
Change from baseline pain intensity at 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ in Turkish (FreNAQ-T)
Time Frame: Change from baseline FreNAQ-T at 3 weeks
FreNAQ-T is a Likert-type questionnaire that assesses individual-specific altered perception (0 = I never felt/never feel this way, 1 = I rarely feel this way, 2 = I sometimes or some of the time feel this way, 3 = I often feel this way, 4 = I always or most of the time feel this way). The questionnaire consists of nine questions, for example, about how they perceive their neck in relation to their body and how they perceive their body position. The total score ranges from 0 to 36. High score indicates a poor prognosis. Onan et al. (2020) developed the Turkish version of the questionnaire and assessed its validity and reliability.
Change from baseline FreNAQ-T at 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Elif Tunç, Msc, Medical Park Gebze Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 009 (Other Identifier: Nahrain Medical Research Collective (NMRC))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Neural Mobilization

Subscribe