"Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab to That of Tocilizumab in Severe Uveitis of Behçet's Disease" (UVB)

"Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab to That of Tocilizumab in Severe Uveitis of Behçet's Disease" (UVB) : Treatment of UVeitis in Behçet's Diseases With Biologics

UVB, is the first randomized prospective, head to head study, comparing Adalimumab to Tocilizumab in sight threatening uveitis of Behçet's Disease (BD). Anti-TNFα has been used for BD uveitis for 15 years. The incidence of blindness in BD has been dramatically reduced in the recent years with the use of biologics. There is no firm evidence or randomized controlled trials directly addressing the best induction therapy in severe BD uveitis. BD uveitis is considered as the most devastating inflammatory ocular disease. Risk of visual loss reaches 25% at 5 years and 80% of patients have a bilateral involvement. Contrasting with immunosuppressors or interferon-alpha, biotherapies act rapidly and are highly effective in steroid's sparing thus preventing occurrence of cataract and/or glaucoma. However, anti-TNFα failed to demonstrate sustainable complete remission over 50 % of severe sight threatening uveitis. There is little published information on use of biologics other than anti-TNFα for severe BD uveitis. Tocilizumab has been used with success in severe and/or resistant cases and is one of the most promising biologics in BD. IL-6 expression correlates with BD activity and other immunological data provide a strong rationale for targeting BD with tocilizumab. Despite a strong rationale, these compounds are not yet approved in BD, which guarantees the innovative nature of this study that aims selecting or dropping any arm when evidence of efficacy already exists. The objective of the study is to assess the benefit of tocilizumab comparatively to that of adalimumab in sight-threatening Behçet's disease uveitis at week 16

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >= 18 at Inclusion
  2. Provide written, informed consent prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures
  3. Diagnosis of Behçet's disease according to the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD) or history of aphthosis.
  4. Diagnosis of non-infectious intermediate, posterior-, or pan-uveitis in at least one eye fulfilling the International Study Group Classification Criteria (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria) of posterior, or pan- uveitis
  5. Sight threatening uveitis defined according to the validated international definition as 2 lines of drop in visual acuity on a 10/10 scale, and/or retinal inflammation (macular oedema and/or retinal vasculitis).
  6. Chest X-ray (postero-anterior and lateral) or CT-scanner results within 12 weeks prior to Inclusion with no evidence of active Tuberculosis, active infection, or malignancy
  7. For female subjects of childbearing potential (premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant) , a negative serum pregnancy test (plasmatic or urinary)
  8. For subjects with reproductive potential, a willingness to use contraceptive measures adequate to prevent the subject or the subject's partner from becoming pregnant during the study and 3 and 5 months after stopping therapy for tocilizumab and adalimumab, respectively. Birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (according to CTFG recommendations). Such methods include:

    • combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

      • oral
      • intravaginal
      • transdermal
    • progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

      • oral
      • injectable
      • implantable
    • intrauterine device (IUD)
    • intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
    • bilateral tubal occlusion
    • vasectomised partner
    • sexual abstinence (In the context of this guidance sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).

    For male subjects :

    • use of a condom
    • vasectomy (with documentation of azoospermia)
    • sexual abstinence
  9. A potential subject with a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) (e.g., QuantiFERON®-TB Gold or T-spot TB® Test) obtained within 6 months prior to inclusion is eligible if her/his chest X-ray does not show evidence suggestive of active TB disease and there are no clinical signs and symptoms of pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary TB disease. These subjects with a latent TB infection who have not already received a prophylactic TB treatment must agree in advance to complete such a treatment course. The treatment should be started at the latest at inclusion.
  10. Affiliation to a social security system. Patients affiliated to universal medical coverage (CMU) are eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infectious uveitis, masquerade syndromes, or uveitis due to causes other than BD uveitis
  2. Active tuberculosis or history of untreated tuberculosis and/or severe infection
  3. Positive HIV antibody and/or positive hepatitis B surface antigen and/or positive hepatitis C RNA, results obtained within 1 month prior to inclusion
  4. History of malignancy within 5 years prior to Inclusion other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated, non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  5. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies
  6. History of multiple sclerosis and/or demyelinating disorder
  7. Hypersensitivity to the active substance or an excipient of the Investigational Medicinal Product or the auxiliary medicine
  8. Active or suspected ocular infection
  9. Active or suspected systemic infection
  10. History of intestinal ulceration or diverticulitis
  11. Known porphyria
  12. Laboratory values assessed during Inclusion:

    1. Neutrophil < 1.0 x 10^3 /mm3
    2. Platelet count < 80 x 10^3 /mm3
    3. ASAT or ALAT > 5 ULN
  13. Treatment with anti-TNF and/or Tocilizumab therapy within 1 month prior to inclusion
  14. if on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or methotrexate at the time of inclusion, these drugs must be withdrawn prior to receiving the tocilizumab or adalimumab dose on Day 0
  15. Stage III and IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac insufficiency
  16. Severe renal (Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) <30ml/min) or liver insufficiency (prothrombin <50% without other causes)
  17. Any live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  18. Breastfeeding or pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adalimumab
Adalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15
Adalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15
Experimental: Tocilizumab
Tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks
Tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with complete remission of ocular involvement (Efficacy)
Time Frame: At week 16 after randomization
Efficacy will be defined by a complete remission of ocular involvement with prednisone lower or equal to 5 mg/day . Ocular involvement response to treatment will be evaluated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Workgroup criteria.
At week 16 after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of patients meeting the corticosteroid sparing targets
Time Frame: At week 16 after randomization
lower than 0.1 mg/day/kg of prednisone
At week 16 after randomization
Mean dose of corticosteroids
Time Frame: At week 16 after randomization
At week 16 after randomization
Cumulative dose of corticosteroids
Time Frame: At week 16 after randomization
At week 16 after randomization
Time to response onset
Time Frame: Up to week 48
Up to week 48
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 4
At week 4
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 8
At week 8
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 12
At week 12
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 16
At week 16
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 24
At week 24
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 36
At week 36
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time Frame: At week 48
At week 48
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 4
At week 4
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 8
At week 8
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 12
At week 12
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 16
At week 16
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 24
At week 24
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 36
At week 36
C-reactive protein rate
Time Frame: At week 48
At week 48
Rate of relapses
Time Frame: up to 48 weeks
Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions
up to 48 weeks
Time to occurrence of relapse or worsening of uveitis
Time Frame: up to 48 weeks
Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions
up to 48 weeks
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity
Time Frame: At week 8

Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

At week 8
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity
Time Frame: At week 16

Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

At week 16
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity
Time Frame: At week 24

Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

At week 24
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score
Time Frame: At week 8

Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

At week 8
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score
Time Frame: At week 16

Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

At week 16
Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score
Time Frame: week 24

Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

week 24
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 4
At week 4
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 8
At week 8
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 12
At week 12
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 16
At week 16
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 24
At week 24
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 36
At week 36
Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)
Time Frame: At week 48
At week 48
Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure
Time Frame: At week 16

It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life.

G. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

At week 16
Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure
Time Frame: At week 24

It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life.

G. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

At week 24
Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life
Time Frame: At week 16

The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

At week 16
Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life
Time Frame: At week 24

The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

At week 24
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 4
at week 4
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 8
at week 8
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 12
at week 12
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 16
at week 16
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 24
at week 24
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 36
at week 36
Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events
Time Frame: at week 48
at week 48
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 4
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 4
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 8
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death. death.
At week 8
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 12
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 12
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 16
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 16
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 24
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 24
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 36
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 36
Severity of adverse clinical events
Time Frame: At week 48
It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.
At week 48
Changes in Tyndall score
Time Frame: At week 8
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.
At week 8
Changes in Tyndall score
Time Frame: At week 16
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterio chamber.
At week 16
Changes in Tyndall score
Time Frame: At week 24
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.
At week 24
Changes in Tyndall score
Time Frame: At week 36
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.
At week 36
Changes in Tyndall score
Time Frame: At week 48
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.
At week 48
Changes in flare score
Time Frame: At week 8
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.
At week 8
Changes in flare score
Time Frame: At week 16
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.
At week 16
Changes in flare score
Time Frame: At week 24
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.
At week 24
Changes in flare score
Time Frame: At week 36
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.
At week 36
Changes in flare score
Time Frame: At week 48
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.
At week 48
Changes of Vitreous Haze
Time Frame: At week 8
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.
At week 8
Changes of Vitreous Haze
Time Frame: At week 16
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.
At week 16
Changes of Vitreous Haze
Time Frame: At week 24
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.
At week 24
Changes of Vitreous Haze
Time Frame: At week 36
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.
At week 36
Changes of Vitreous Haze
Time Frame: At week 48
The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.
At week 48
Changes in Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: At week 8

Evaluated by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity.

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

At week 8
Changes in Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: At week 16

Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

At week 16
Changes in Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: At week 24

Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

At week 24
Changes in Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: At week 36

Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

At week 36
Changes in Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: At week 48

Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

At week 48
Changes in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: At week 8
Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
At week 8
Changes in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: At week 16
Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
At week 16
Changes in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: At week 24
Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
At week 24
Changes in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: At week 36
Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
At week 36
Changes in central retinal thickness
Time Frame: At week 48
Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
At week 48
Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns
Time Frame: At week 8
At week 8
Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns
Time Frame: At week 16
At week 16
Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns
Time Frame: At week 24
At week 24
Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns
Time Frame: At week 36
At week 36
Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns
Time Frame: At week 48
At week 48
Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography
Time Frame: At week 16
in case of retinal vasculitis
At week 16
Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography
Time Frame: At week 24
in case of retinal vasculitis
At week 24
Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography
Time Frame: At week 36
in case of retinal vasculitis
At week 36
Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography
Time Frame: At week 48
in case of retinal vasculitis
At week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behcet's Uveitis

Clinical Trials on Adalimumab

3
Subscribe