- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05884645
Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION) (VITION)
Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION): A Prospective Observational Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study design
The VITION study protocol describes the design of a prospective, observational study. Inclusion will commence in 2023 at the anesthesia and intensive care departments in the Capital Region of Denmark.
Participants
Patients across all ages are eligible for inclusion if they are undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation.
Exclusion criteria
Patients are excluded if they adhere to one of the exclusion criteria:
- Upper airway malformations (e.g., laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, and subglottic stenosis17,18).
- Failed attempt by video laryngoscopy due to malfunctioning equipment.
- Missing or corrupted video recording.
- Informed consent is not obtained from the participants or participants' parents / legal guardians.
Interventions and comparisons
This prospective, observational study will have no interventions or comparisons.
Primary objective
The primary objective is to characterize anatomical landmarks and performances of intubations in a large and diverse pool of clinicians and patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
København, Denmark, 2100
- Rigshospitalet
-
København, Denmark
- Capital Region of Denmark
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Patients are eligible if they adhere to all the following inclusion criteria:
● Undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation.
Exclusion criteria
Patients are excluded if they adhere to one of the exclusion criteria:
- Upper airway malformations (e.g., laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, and subglottic stenosis).
- Failed attempt by video laryngoscopy due to malfunctioning equipment.
- Missing or corrupted video recording.
- Informed consent is not obtained from the participants or participants' parents / legal guardians.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation
Patients across all ages undergoing endotracheal intubation.
|
There will be no intervention in this prospective observational cohort study.
Endotracheal intubation is already used to secure the airway by placing an endotracheal tube into the trachea via the oral or nasal route.
Indications include the need for airway control during general anaesthesia, mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, and various forms of acute respiratory distress.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
|
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
|
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
|
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
|
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time consumption of the course.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
A course is defined as one method for intubation (i.e., the same airway device, approach, and medication regimen).
Many attempts by multiple providers are allowed within a given course as long as all attempts are made using the same method.
|
During the procedure.
|
Successful endotracheal intubation.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
Successful endotracheal intubation is defined as correct endotracheal tube placement in the trachea confirmed by chest rise, auscultation, waveform monitor for end-tidal CO2, and/or chest radiograph in first, second, or three attempts.10,19
First-attempt success is defined according to previous studies as successful intubation on the first attempt by the first provider.
Success within two attempts is defined as successful intubation on the second attempt by the same provider.
Success within 3 attempts is defined as successful intubation on any attempt by the same provider.
|
During the procedure.
|
Overall course success.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
Overall course success is defined as successful intubation by any provider on any attempt within that course.
|
During the procedure.
|
Severe oxygen desaturations
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
Severe oxygen desaturations are defined according to previous studies as a 20% or more decrease in oxygen saturation from the highest level immediately before the first attempt.
|
During the procedure.
|
Non-severe TIAEs
Time Frame: 72 hours after the procedure
|
Non-severe TIAEs: Oesophageal intubation with immediate recognition, dysrhythmia including any duration of heart rate <60 beats per minute without chest compressions, main-stem bronchial intubation, emesis without aspiration, pain or agitation requiring additional medications causing a delay in intubation, epistaxis, lip trauma, dental injury, medication error, and hypertension.
|
72 hours after the procedure
|
Severe TIAEs
Time Frame: 72 hours after the procedure
|
Severe TIAEs: Cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions, oesophageal intubation with delayed recognition (defined as placement of the endotracheal tube into the oesophagus or hypopharynx with clinical deterioration, e.g., desaturation, before removal of the misplaced tube), emesis with aspiration, hypotension requiring therapy, laryngospasm, pneumothorax or pneumo-mediastinum, and direct airway injury (e.g., vocal cord injury, laryngeal injury, tracheal injury, false passage creation).
|
72 hours after the procedure
|
Number of attempts.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
|
The number of attempts (one, two, and three or more).
|
During the procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Niklas Breindahl, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- VITION
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation Complication
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
University Hospital HeidelbergRecruitingIntubation | Intubation ComplicationGermany
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation, DifficultTaiwan
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; DifficultChina
-
University at BuffaloTerminatedIntubation Complication | Intubation;DifficultUnited States
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompleted
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Udayana UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Intubation Complication | Intubation;DifficultIndonesia
-
Hospital General Universitario de ValenciaFIPSERecruitingDifficult Intubation | Anesthesia Intubation ComplicationSpain
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)Not yet recruitingEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or Failed
Clinical Trials on Video-directed endotracheal intubation
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalCompletedPediatrics | Anesthesiology
-
Loma Linda UniversityCompletedEndotracheal IntubationUnited States
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzCompletedUnexpected Difficult AirwayGermany
-
Hopital FochCompleted
-
University of VirginiaActive, not recruitingCongenital Heart Disease | Oral AversionUnited States
-
Udayana UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or FailedIndonesia
-
King Saud UniversityCompletedPain | Endotracheal Intubation | PharyngitisSaudi Arabia
-
University of British ColumbiaCompleted
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...Completed
-
St. Bortolo HospitalFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRecruiting