Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION) (VITION)

April 23, 2024 updated by: Lise Aunsholt

Video Intelligence intubaTION (VITION): A Prospective Observational Study

This study aims to train an AI for video-directed endotracheal intubation (VITION) to recognise the anatomical structures of the upper airway during video-directed endotracheal intubations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design

The VITION study protocol describes the design of a prospective, observational study. Inclusion will commence in 2023 at the anesthesia and intensive care departments in the Capital Region of Denmark.

Participants

Patients across all ages are eligible for inclusion if they are undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded if they adhere to one of the exclusion criteria:

  • Upper airway malformations (e.g., laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, and subglottic stenosis17,18).
  • Failed attempt by video laryngoscopy due to malfunctioning equipment.
  • Missing or corrupted video recording.
  • Informed consent is not obtained from the participants or participants' parents / legal guardians.

Interventions and comparisons

This prospective, observational study will have no interventions or comparisons.

Primary objective

The primary objective is to characterize anatomical landmarks and performances of intubations in a large and diverse pool of clinicians and patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • København, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet
      • København, Denmark
        • Capital Region of Denmark

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We will include patients across all ages are eligible for inclusion if they are undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation in the Capital Region of Denmark.

Description

Patients are eligible if they adhere to all the following inclusion criteria:

● Undergoing video-directed oral or nasal endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients are excluded if they adhere to one of the exclusion criteria:

  • Upper airway malformations (e.g., laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, and subglottic stenosis).
  • Failed attempt by video laryngoscopy due to malfunctioning equipment.
  • Missing or corrupted video recording.
  • Informed consent is not obtained from the participants or participants' parents / legal guardians.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation
Patients across all ages undergoing endotracheal intubation.
There will be no intervention in this prospective observational cohort study. Endotracheal intubation is already used to secure the airway by placing an endotracheal tube into the trachea via the oral or nasal route. Indications include the need for airway control during general anaesthesia, mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, and various forms of acute respiratory distress.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
Accuracy of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
Sensitivity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
Specificity of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
Time Frame: The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.
AUC of the AI algorithm to recognise the anatomical landmarks in the upper airway.
The landmarks will be identified on the multimedia file from the procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time consumption of the course.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
A course is defined as one method for intubation (i.e., the same airway device, approach, and medication regimen). Many attempts by multiple providers are allowed within a given course as long as all attempts are made using the same method.
During the procedure.
Successful endotracheal intubation.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
Successful endotracheal intubation is defined as correct endotracheal tube placement in the trachea confirmed by chest rise, auscultation, waveform monitor for end-tidal CO2, and/or chest radiograph in first, second, or three attempts.10,19 First-attempt success is defined according to previous studies as successful intubation on the first attempt by the first provider. Success within two attempts is defined as successful intubation on the second attempt by the same provider. Success within 3 attempts is defined as successful intubation on any attempt by the same provider.
During the procedure.
Overall course success.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
Overall course success is defined as successful intubation by any provider on any attempt within that course.
During the procedure.
Severe oxygen desaturations
Time Frame: During the procedure.
Severe oxygen desaturations are defined according to previous studies as a 20% or more decrease in oxygen saturation from the highest level immediately before the first attempt.
During the procedure.
Non-severe TIAEs
Time Frame: 72 hours after the procedure
Non-severe TIAEs: Oesophageal intubation with immediate recognition, dysrhythmia including any duration of heart rate <60 beats per minute without chest compressions, main-stem bronchial intubation, emesis without aspiration, pain or agitation requiring additional medications causing a delay in intubation, epistaxis, lip trauma, dental injury, medication error, and hypertension.
72 hours after the procedure
Severe TIAEs
Time Frame: 72 hours after the procedure
Severe TIAEs: Cardiac arrest requiring chest compressions, oesophageal intubation with delayed recognition (defined as placement of the endotracheal tube into the oesophagus or hypopharynx with clinical deterioration, e.g., desaturation, before removal of the misplaced tube), emesis with aspiration, hypotension requiring therapy, laryngospasm, pneumothorax or pneumo-mediastinum, and direct airway injury (e.g., vocal cord injury, laryngeal injury, tracheal injury, false passage creation).
72 hours after the procedure
Number of attempts.
Time Frame: During the procedure.
The number of attempts (one, two, and three or more).
During the procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Niklas Breindahl, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The Capital Region in Denmark retains all rights to the collected data, which must not be shared without approval.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation Complication

Clinical Trials on Video-directed endotracheal intubation

3
Subscribe