Yoga Versus Health Education for the Treatment of Persistent Fatigue in Patients With Post COVID-19 Syndrome (YoFaPoCo)

July 4, 2025 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial: Yoga Versus Health Education for the Treatment of Persistent Fatigue in Patients With Post COVID-19 Syndrome

Evaluation of the short- and medium-term effect of a yoga intervention in addition to routine care compared to health education in addition to routine care on fatigue in patients with post covid syndrome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70376
        • Recruiting
        • Bosch-Health-Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis
  • Follow-up symptoms of ≥ 12 weeks
  • Persistent fatigue (scores ≥4 on the binomial Chalder Fatigue Scale).
  • Self-assessment that fatigue was a consequence of COVID-19 disease
  • Age 18-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic medical conditions or regular use of medications associated with fatigue
  • Indication of health cause of fatigue other than post-COVID.
  • Indication of other factors as the main cause of fatigue
  • Physical limitations that do not allow participation in the yoga intervention
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • Concurrent participation in other clinical trials
  • Current yoga practice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Yoga Therapy
12 week yoga program, one weekly session of 90 minutes each, plus 2 times weekly 30 minutes of self practice.

The range of interventions is based on previous studies on yoga interventions specifically for fatigue patients as well as on recommendations, for example, from the WHO. The yoga therapy includes 3 elements: yoga postures (asanas), breathing techniques (pranayama) and relaxation moments.

Emphasis on postures and breathing techniques that are considered to be effective for fatigue symptoms, as well as specific breathing exercises to strengthen the respiratory muscles and increase lung volume.

Active Comparator: Health Education
12 week health education program, one weekly session of 90 minutes each, plus 2 times weekly 30 minutes of self practice.
Health education courses are conducted on-site once a week for 90 minutes over a 12-week period by a psychologist with clinical experience. The courses are didactic in nature and consist of lectures on topics of interest to patients with post-COVID syndrome and fatigue, followed by questions and discussion sessions. Topics include information on post-COVID syndrome and fatigue, an introduction to self-help for post-viral symptoms, psychosocial problems and fatigue, relaxation and stress management, nutrition, sleep hygiene, exercise, respecting one's own limits, acceptance, finding meaning, and achieving goals.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The chalder fatigue scale is used to assess the severity of fatigue within the last 4 weeks. It contains 11 questions in a four-step answer format (0-4), 7 of which refer to the degree of physical fatigue and 4 to the degree of mental fatigue. In its binomial evaluation (range 0-11) it can be used with a cut-off of (≥ 4) to divide patients into those with and those without fatigue.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life SF-12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire, The SF-12 represents the most commonly used instrument in clinical trials to assess generic quality of life. The questionnaire captures 8 different subscales, which are combined into a physical and a psychological summated scale.
12 weeks
Health related quality of life SF-12
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire, The SF-12 represents the most commonly used instrument in clinical trials to assess generic quality of life. The questionnaire captures 8 different subscales, which are combined into a physical and a psychological summated scale.
24 weeks
Health related quality of life EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessed, health related, quality of life questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. In this study, the EQ-5D-5L is used for cost-effectiveness analysis, together with healthcare-related costs.
12 weeks
Health related quality of life EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessed, health related, quality of life questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. In this study, the EQ-5D-5L is used for cost-effectiveness analysis, together with healthcare-related costs.
24 weeks
Psychological symptoms
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale asks 14 questions, of which 7 are about anxiety and 7 about depression in patients with physical illnesses and physical complaints. More precisely, it measures the self-assessed severity of patients' anxious and depressive symptoms in relation to the past week.
12 weeks
Psychological symptoms
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale asks 14 questions, of which 7 are about anxiety and 7 about depression in patients with physical illnesses and physical complaints. More precisely, it measures the self-assessed severity of patients' anxious and depressive symptoms in relation to the past week.
24 weeks
Stress
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The current stress perception of the patients is assessed by means of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). This measures the current subjective perceived stress of the patients on the basis of 10 items.
12 weeks
Stress
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The current stress perception of the patients is assessed by means of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). This measures the current subjective perceived stress of the patients on the basis of 10 items.
24 weeks
Post-exertional malaise
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a delayed worsening of symptoms that occurs after minimal physical or mental activity. The DePaul-Symptom Questionaire (DSQ) is used to asses PEM.
12 weeks
Post-exertional malaise
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a delayed worsening of symptoms that occurs after minimal physical or mental activity. The DePaul-Symptom Questionaire (DSQ) is used to asses PEM.
24 weeks
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) was originally developed in 1989 as part of the Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Study to assess self-efficacy in arthritis patients and has since been used to assess it in many disease conditions. A short version (ASES-8/ASES-D) has been validated. This version surveys in scale level 1-10 the perceived ability to deal with occurring symptoms such as: Pain or fatigue. Self-efficacy will be used in mediation analyses of treatment effects.
12 weeks
Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) was originally developed in 1989 as part of the Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Study to assess self-efficacy in arthritis patients and has since been used to assess it in many disease conditions. A short version (ASES-8/ASES-D) has been validated. This version surveys in scale level 1-10 the perceived ability to deal with occurring symptoms such as: Pain or fatigue. Self-efficacy will be used in mediation analyses of treatment effects.
24 weeks
C-reactive proteine
Time Frame: 12 weeks
CRP as marker of pro-inflammatory cytokine activity, from blood samples.
12 weeks
C-reactive proteine
Time Frame: 24 weeks
CRP as marker of pro-inflammatory cytokine activity, from blood samples.
24 weeks
Interleukine-6
Time Frame: 12 weeks
IL-6, as marker of pro-inflammatory cytokine activity, from blood samples.
12 weeks
Interleukine-6
Time Frame: 24 weeks
IL-6, as marker of pro-inflammatory cytokine activity, from blood samples.
24 weeks
D-dimer
Time Frame: 12 weeks
D-dimer, as a by-product of the blood clotting and break-down process that can be measured via analysis of a blood sample
12 weeks
D-dimer
Time Frame: 24 weeks
D-dimer, as a by-product of the blood clotting and break-down process that can be measured via analysis of a blood sample
24 weeks
Lactate dehydrogenase
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), measuring the amount of LDH in the blood. Lactate dehydrogenase is an enzyme that the body uses during the process of turning sugar into energy for your cells to use.
12 weeks
Lactate dehydrogenase
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), measuring the amount of LDH in the blood. Lactate dehydrogenase is an enzyme that the body uses during the process of turning sugar into energy for your cells to use.
24 weeks
Leukocytes and lymphocytes
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Leukocytes and lymphocytes, from blood samples.
12 weeks
Leukocytes and lymphocytes
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Leukocytes and lymphocytes, from blood samples.
24 weeks
Movement tracking
Time Frame: 12 weeks
General tracking of patients' movement habits via activity monitor
12 weeks
Movement tracking
Time Frame: 24 weeks
General tracking of patients' movement habits via activity monitor
24 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The chalder fatigue scale is used to assess the severity of fatigue within the last 4 weeks. It contains 11 questions in a four-step answer format (0-4), 7 of which refer to the degree of physical fatigue and 4 to the degree of mental fatigue. In its binomial evaluation (range 0-11) it can be used with a cut-off of (≥ 4) to divide patients into those with and those without fatigue.
24 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses the quality of sleep over the past 4 weeks using 24 questions, 17 for self-assessment and 7 for external assessment. It is used clinically to monitor patients with sleep disorders and to screen for sleep disorders in epidemiological studies. In this study, only the 17 self-assessment items are collected.
12 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses the quality of sleep over the past 4 weeks using 24 questions, 17 for self-assessment and 7 for external assessment. It is used clinically to monitor patients with sleep disorders and to screen for sleep disorders in epidemiological studies. In this study, only the 17 self-assessment items are collected.
24 weeks
Body awareness
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) assesses participants' subjective body awareness in four subdimensions: note responses or changes in body processes, predict bodily reaction, sleep-wake cycle, and onset of illness. The validated single-factor German version consists of 17 questions on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all true about me) to 7 (very true about me). The values of the individual items are added together to form a total score. Body awareness will be used in mediation analyses of treatment effects.
12 weeks
Body awareness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) assesses participants' subjective body awareness in four subdimensions: note responses or changes in body processes, predict bodily reaction, sleep-wake cycle, and onset of illness. The validated single-factor German version consists of 17 questions on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all true about me) to 7 (very true about me). The values of the individual items are added together to form a total score. Body awareness will be used in mediation analyses of treatment effects.
24 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: Week 0, 1-12, 13 and 25
Adverse events and serious adverse events are documented. Adverse events include any adverse symptoms, illnesses, disorders, or accidents that occur during the course of the study. Serious adverse events include events occurring during the course of the study that are immediately life-threatening and/or result in serious health problems (specifically, requiring unanticipated hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or resulting in serious disability or incapacitation). Adverse events (including PEM) and serious adverse events will be documented by participants on a weekly basis throughout the intervention period. Participants will be instructed to immediately notify the study site upon the occurrence of any serious adverse event. The severity as well as the possible causal relationship with the intervention will be assessed by the study physician.
Week 0, 1-12, 13 and 25
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Repeated measurement of hand strength can help detect physical decline and inflammatory processes Hand grip strength measurement can be an invaluable tool for monitoring physical performance decline.
12 weeks
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Repeated measurement of hand grip strength can help detect physical decline and inflammatory processes Hand strength measurement can be an invaluable tool for monitoring physical performance decline.
24 weeks
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
24-hour measurement of heart rate variability (HRV) to determine the functionality of the participant's autonomic nervous system. A 3-channel ECG recorder (SRA/Multi-ECG recorder, SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany) is used. Several HRV time-domain and HRV frequency-domain measures will be evaluated and analyzed for the total day and night (sleeping time) period as well as for 5-minutes-intervals within these two periods (SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50, SDANN, SDNNI, VLF power, LF power, HF power, LF/HF).
12 weeks
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24-hour measurement of heart rate variability (HRV) to determine the functionality of the participant's autonomic nervous system. A 3-channel ECG recorder (SRA/Multi-ECG recorder, SR-Medizinelektronik, Stuttgart, Germany) is used. Several HRV time-domain and HRV frequency-domain measures will be evaluated and analyzed for the total day and night (sleeping time) period as well as for 5-minutes-intervals within these two periods (SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50, SDANN, SDNNI, VLF power, LF power, HF power, LF/HF).
24 weeks
Cost for Patient Questionnaire (CoPaQ)
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Direct medical and non-medical costs are collected using this questionnaire. The questionnaire is a modified version of the Cost for Patient Questionnaire (CoPaQ), designed to collect all information on health care costs.
12 weeks, 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Therapy rationale and therapy expectancy
Time Frame: Week 0
The Credibility Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) published by Ametrano, et al. 2011 and validated as German version by Rieke, et al. 2013 is used to measure Therapierationale and Therapieerwartung at baseline. It measures these over 6 items using 9-point Likert scales.
Week 0
Personality dimensions
Time Frame: Week 0
Big-Five-Inventory-10 (BFI-10) is used to assess personality dimensions based on the big-5 model.
Week 0
Qualitative Interviews
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Holger Cramer, Professor, University Hospital Tübingen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Yoga Therapy

Subscribe