O-ARM Stereotactic Imaging in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease (STEREOBLOC)

May 6, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Evaluation of Intraoperative O-ARM Stereotactic Imaging Versus Conventional Pre-operative Stereotactic Imaging in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

During deep brain stimulation procedures in Parkinson's disease (PD), the most important prognostic element is the positioning of the surgical electrode in the subthalamic nucleus which is the anatomical target. The main objective of this project is therefore to compare 2 techniques thanks to a prospective comparative randomised open-label study: the use of O-ARM to acquire stereotactic imaging directly in the operating room and the standard technique requiring stereotactic imaging to be performed in the radiology department.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prior to electrode implantation we perform stereotactic imaging which requires the fixation of a stereotactic frame on the patient's head before imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI / Computed Tomography CT). Currently, it is necessary to transfer the patient to the imaging department outside of the operating room after the stereotactic frame has been placed, for imaging (either MRI or CT) and then to return to the operating room to begin the electrode implantation procedure. Since 2016, the new generation O-Arm 2 allows the acquisition of stereotactic imaging with the stereotactic frame in place by increasing the field of view (40 cm versus 20 cm previously) directly in the operating room. As a result, the transfer step to the MRI and CT scanner preoperatively may no longer be necessary, and the procedure can be started more quickly with greater comfort and safety for the patient and the anaesthesia team. Several teams around the world have begun to use framed O-Arm as the gold standard for stereotactic imaging. However, no randomised controlled study has been performed to date comparing O-Arm stereotactic imaging with pre-operative CT and/or MRI reference imaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease at the stage of motor fluctuations despite optimal medical treatment
  • Indication for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus approved by the local multidisciplinary deep brain stimulation committee after an operability assessment (see Appendix)
  • Informed and signed patient consent
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive decline assessed in a dedicated multidisciplinary consultation
  • Contraindication to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Presence of pathologies contraindicating deep brain stimulation
  • No contraceptive treatment for women of childbearing age
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment that cannot be stopped
  • Persons under legal protection (persons deprived of liberty or incapable of giving consent or under guardianship or tutelage...)
  • Patient with severe psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: O-Arm stereotactic imaging
Imaging is performing directly in the operating room.
Prior to electrode implantation, O-ARm stereotactic imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Active Comparator: Standard stereotactic imaging
Imaging is performing in Radiology department.
Prior to electrode implantation, standard stereotactic imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The absolute accuracy of Deep Brain Stimulation electrode implantation
Time Frame: 48 hours
The radial distance between the theoretical target and the electrode in the plane of the target regardless of the chosen trajectory (central, anterior, lateral). This distance corresponds to the minimum error between the target and the electrode. This measurement is made from the postoperative brain scan.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central and alternate position of the electrodes rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Comparison of the anatomical location of the electrode compared to the anatomical target (subthalamic nucleus) after matching preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images
1 day
Surgical Times
Time Frame: 1 day
Time from the end of the stereotactic frame to the surgical incision and time from the entry into room to the exit from room after generator implantation.
1 day
Clinical effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 months

Comparison of The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II, III and IV scores between baseline and 6 months and then at 6 months between the 2 groups.

The UPDRS scale is composed of 47 items grouped into three parts : II, III and IV. Responses scale ranging from 0 (normal/no symptoms) to 4 (severe).

6 months
Daily dose of Levodopa decrease
Time Frame: 6 months
The change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) before surgery and at 6 months compared between the 2 groups. This LEDD corresponds to the amount of antiparkinsonian treatments prescribed to the patient
6 months
Adverse effect rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical reporting of patient events/adverse reactions
6 months
Correlation between absolute accuracy and clinical effectiveness
Time Frame: 6 months
Correlation between radial accuracy and UPDRS score for both groups
6 months
The anatomical accuracy of Deep Brain Stimulation electrode implantation
Time Frame: 48 hours
Automatic calculation of the vector distance between the middle of pad 1 on the electrode and the theoretical target by software.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amaury De Barros, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on O-Arm Stereotactic imaging

Subscribe