Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (RESTART)

June 23, 2025 updated by: Joost Daemen, Erasmus Medical Center

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: the RESTART Study

This prospective, single-arm, interventional study is designed to assess the short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of bilateral ultrasound renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) of the native kidneys in renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Objectives:

  • To assess the short-term and long-term changes in ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP) following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
  • To assess the long-term safety of native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
  • To assess the short-term and long-term change in antihypertensive drug prescriptions following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
  • To assess the short-term and long-term change in adherence to antihypertensive drugs following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The RESTART study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, single-arm interventional study investigating the safety and efficacy of bilateral native kidney RDN in 40 renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite antihypertensive medication (or with a documented intolerance to antihypertensive drugs).

Previously, RDN demonstrated to safely reduce BP as compared to sham-control in multiple randomized clinical trials, both in patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Up until now, patients with a history of renal failure or kidney transplantation have been excluded from these studies. As the pathophysiology of hypertension is considered different in hypertensive renal transplant patients as compared to the previously studied populations (without kidney transplantation), the effect of native kidney RDN in hypertensive patients with a history of kidney transplantation remains unknown. The current study aims to provide novel insights on the safety and efficacy of RDN in this particular population. Adjustment for routine therapy adherence will also be performed as this proved to be an important confounding factor in previous research.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Kidney transplantation ≥ 12 months ago with stable immunosuppressive drug treatment
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≥ 40 ml/min/1.73m2
  • Office systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and a mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg at screening
  • Antihypertensive medication regimen:

    • Stable regimen of at least two antihypertensive drugs of different classes, including a diuretic (defined a thiazide diuretic, loop diuretic or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist), for at least three months, or
    • Documented intolerance to three classes of antihypertensive drugs, and
    • A change in antihypertensive drug regimen is not anticipated within the oncoming three months.
  • Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Native renal artery anatomy not eligible for RDN, defined as at least one of the following conditions:

    • History of renal artery stenting or angioplasty
    • History of renal denervation
    • History of kidney tumors
    • Renal artery diameter < 3 mm or > 8 mm
    • Renal artery length < 20 mm
    • Fibromuscular disease (FMD) of the native renal arteries
    • Renal artery aneurysm
    • Renal artery stenosis > 30%
  • Presence of a remnant transplant kidney after re-transplantation or absence of native kidneys
  • Solitary native kidney
  • History of intravenous contrast dye allergy or nephropathy
  • Iliac/femoral artery stenosis precluding insertion of the Paradise catheter
  • Uncorrected, treatable secondary cause of hypertension
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy < one year at the discretion of the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Renal sympathetic denervation
Bilateral renal sympathetic denervation of the native kidneys using the Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Safety: occurrence of the composite endpoint
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

Consisting of (whichever occurs first):

  • All-cause mortality
  • New onset (acute) end-stage renal disease (eGFR< 15 mL/min/m2 or need for renal replacement therapy)
  • Significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage
  • Renal artery perforation requiring an invasive intervention
  • Renal artery dissection requiring an invasive intervention
  • Major vascular complications
  • Hospitalization for hypertensive or hypotensive crisis
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: change in daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: change in nighttime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: change in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: changes in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: change in the percentage therapy adherence
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Efficacy: annual changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Efficacy: annual changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Efficacy: annual changes in in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Efficacy: annual change in the percentage therapy adherence
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Safety: the number of patients in whom no successful bilateral renal denervation procedure can be performed
Time Frame: Periprocedural
E.g. due to anatomical difficulties
Periprocedural
Safety: change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Safety: change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
Safety: occurrence of the individual components of the primary safety outcome
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
  • All-cause mortality
  • New onset (acute) end-stage renal disease (eGFR< 15 mL/min/m2 or need for renal replacement therapy)
  • Significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage
  • Renal artery perforation requiring an invasive intervention
  • Renal artery dissection requiring an invasive intervention
  • Major vascular complications
  • Hospitalization for hypertensive or hypotensive crisis
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Safety: occurrence of any major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Safety: occurrence of the individual components of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Safety: annual change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Safety: annual change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RESTART - renal denervation

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.

Subscribe