- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05934383
Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (RESTART)
Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: the RESTART Study
This prospective, single-arm, interventional study is designed to assess the short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of bilateral ultrasound renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) of the native kidneys in renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Objectives:
- To assess the short-term and long-term changes in ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP) following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
- To assess the long-term safety of native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
- To assess the short-term and long-term change in antihypertensive drug prescriptions following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
- To assess the short-term and long-term change in adherence to antihypertensive drugs following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The RESTART study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, single-arm interventional study investigating the safety and efficacy of bilateral native kidney RDN in 40 renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite antihypertensive medication (or with a documented intolerance to antihypertensive drugs).
Previously, RDN demonstrated to safely reduce BP as compared to sham-control in multiple randomized clinical trials, both in patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Up until now, patients with a history of renal failure or kidney transplantation have been excluded from these studies. As the pathophysiology of hypertension is considered different in hypertensive renal transplant patients as compared to the previously studied populations (without kidney transplantation), the effect of native kidney RDN in hypertensive patients with a history of kidney transplantation remains unknown. The current study aims to provide novel insights on the safety and efficacy of RDN in this particular population. Adjustment for routine therapy adherence will also be performed as this proved to be an important confounding factor in previous research.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Joost Daemen, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31107040704
- Email: j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Erasmus University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Joost Daemen, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31107040704
- Email: j.daemen@erasmusmc.nl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Kidney transplantation ≥ 12 months ago with stable immunosuppressive drug treatment
- Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≥ 40 ml/min/1.73m2
- Office systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and a mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg at screening
Antihypertensive medication regimen:
- Stable regimen of at least two antihypertensive drugs of different classes, including a diuretic (defined a thiazide diuretic, loop diuretic or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist), for at least three months, or
- Documented intolerance to three classes of antihypertensive drugs, and
- A change in antihypertensive drug regimen is not anticipated within the oncoming three months.
- Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Native renal artery anatomy not eligible for RDN, defined as at least one of the following conditions:
- History of renal artery stenting or angioplasty
- History of renal denervation
- History of kidney tumors
- Renal artery diameter < 3 mm or > 8 mm
- Renal artery length < 20 mm
- Fibromuscular disease (FMD) of the native renal arteries
- Renal artery aneurysm
- Renal artery stenosis > 30%
- Presence of a remnant transplant kidney after re-transplantation or absence of native kidneys
- Solitary native kidney
- History of intravenous contrast dye allergy or nephropathy
- Iliac/femoral artery stenosis precluding insertion of the Paradise catheter
- Uncorrected, treatable secondary cause of hypertension
- Pregnancy
- Life expectancy < one year at the discretion of the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Renal sympathetic denervation
|
Bilateral renal sympathetic denervation of the native kidneys using the Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Safety: occurrence of the composite endpoint
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Consisting of (whichever occurs first):
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: change in daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: change in nighttime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: change in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
Efficacy: changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
Efficacy: changes in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: change in the percentage therapy adherence
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
Efficacy: annual changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: annual changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: annual changes in in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
|
Efficacy: annual change in the percentage therapy adherence
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
Safety: the number of patients in whom no successful bilateral renal denervation procedure can be performed
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
E.g. due to anatomical difficulties
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Safety: change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Safety: change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)
Time Frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up
|
|
|
Safety: occurrence of the individual components of the primary safety outcome
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
Safety: occurrence of any major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
Safety: occurrence of the individual components of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
Safety: annual change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
|
|
Safety: annual change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)
Time Frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RESTART - renal denervation
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypertension
-
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu BranchRecruitingHypertension,Essential | Hypertension, MaskedTaiwan
-
BackBeat Medical IncNot yet recruitingHypertension, Systolic | Hypertension (HTN) | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEFGeorgia
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingNot yet recruiting
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do SulCompletedHypertension (HTN) | Hypertension ArterialBrazil
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamTroy UniversityCompletedHypertension | Hypertension, Resistant to Conventional Therapy | Uncontrolled Hypertension | Hypertension, White CoatUnited States
-
Franz Rischard, DOAcceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway...Not yet recruitingPulmonary Hypertension | Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)United States
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityNot yet recruitingPRIMARY HYPERTENSIONTurkey (Türkiye)
-
SingHealth PolyclinicsNanyang PolytechnicEnrolling by invitationHypertension,EssentialSingapore
-
Hacettepe UniversityBozok UniversityCompletedHypertension | Arterial Hypertension | Systemic HypertensionTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.Recruiting
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.RecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Vascular Diseases | HypertensionUnited States
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.RecruitingHypertensionGermany, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Monaco, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
Otsuka Medical Devices Co., Ltd. JapanActive, not recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Vascular Diseases | HypertensionJapan
-
Hippocration General HospitalReCor Medical, Inc.RecruitingStress | Anxiety | Hypertension ArterialGreece
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.Active, not recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Vascular Diseases | HypertensionUnited States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, France, Ireland, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.CompletedResistant HypertensionGermany, Sweden, Netherlands
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.Completed
-
ReCor Medical, Inc.Active, not recruitingVascular Diseases | HypertensionUnited States, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Poland, Belgium
-
University Hospital, SaarlandUnknownHeart Failure | Hypertension | Diabetes | Chronic Kidney Disease | Heart Rhythm DisordersGermany