Striatum and Hippocampus on Different Time Scales (e-Time)

Role of the Striatum and Hippocampus on Different Time Scales

Time processing is fundamental to survival and goal reaching in humans. Different time scales (seconds, minutes, and beyond) are processed through specific cognitive processes involving different neural representations. It is generally agreed that time scale in seconds-to-minutes range named "interval timing" would be anatomically linked to the striatum. Indeed, it is possible to demonstrate a deficit of interval timing processes in patients suffering from striatal damage (Huntington's disease). However, recent findings show involvement of a second brain structure, the hippocampus, in interval timing processing in the minutes range, suggesting an interaction between the striatum and hippocampus. Presumably, patients with hippocampal damage (Alzheimer's disease) would specifically show a decrease in performance for this minutes-range time scale. This study aims to provide a better understanding of the role of the striatum in the treatment of time and its interactions with other brain structures such as the hippocampus. More specifically, it is unclear whether the striatum plays a platform role that would always be involved regardless of the time scale, as suggested by the unified model of time or whether different brain structures is solicited according to the time scale, as suggested by the modular system model. In order to elucidate these issues, a potential double dissociation between brain structures and time scales will be tested.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In that aim, we will evaluate patients with Huntington's disease and patients with Alzheimer's disease by developing and using time processing paradigms comparing short and long time scales.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Créteil, France, 94010
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris - Hôpital Henri Mondor
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Huntington's disease gene carriers

    • Patient included in the BioHD protocol
    • Age from 18 to 90 years old
    • Symptomatic patient
    • TFC ≥ 11
    • UHDRS motor> 5
    • Native language: French
    • Affiliation to a social security or to another social protection
    • Signature of informed consent

      • Patients with Alzheimer's disease

    • MMS from 20 to 26 (included)
    • Age: from 60 to 90 years old
    • Native language: French
    • Progressive deterioration of memory reported by patient or caregiver for more than 6 months
    • Profile at RL /RI 16: no significant improvement with indexing
    • Episodic memory disorder isolated or associated with other cognitive disorders
    • MRI: Atrophy of the median temporal lobe
    • Affiliation to a social security or to another social protection
    • Signature of informed consent

      • Healthy subjects

    • Healthy subject included in the BioHD protocol
    • MMS ≥ 26
    • Age from 18 to 90 years old
    • Native language: French
    • Affiliation to a social security or to another social protection
    • Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Huntington's disease gene carriers

    • Intellectual deterioration preventing understanding of the protocol
    • Other dementia than Huntington's disease
    • Patient living alone at home
    • Major depression
    • Patient under legal protection
    • Patient deprived of liberty
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, situation known to the investigator
    • Inability to handle an electronic tablet
  • Patients with Alzheimer's disease

    • Intellectual deterioration preventing understanding of the protocol
    • Patient living alone at home
    • Sudden onset of memory impairment
    • Early onset of the following symptoms: difficulty in walking, convulsions, changes in behavior
    • Focal neurological characteristics including hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual field deficit
    • Early extrapyramidal sign
    • Other dementia than Alzheimer's disease
    • Major depression
    • Cerebrovascular disease
    • Toxic, metabolic or infectious anomaly
    • Patient under legal protection
    • Patient deprived of liberty
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, situation known to the investigator
    • Inability to handle an electronic tablet
  • Healthy subjects

    • Intellectual deterioration preventing understanding of the protocol
    • Known neurological or psychiatric illness
    • Patient under legal protection
    • Subject deprived of liberty
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, situation known to the investigator
    • Inability to handle an electronic tablet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients carrying the Huntington's gene
A "long" temporal perception task and a "short" temporal perception task
A "long" temporal perception task in which the duration of the stimulus, around 2 min, is materialized by a video. For each trial, two videos are displayed to the participants, and then the task of the participant is to indicate the longest video and to give his level of confidence in his answer. A "short" temporal perception task which will take place in the same way as the "long" task except that the duration of the stimulus, around 2 seconds, is materialized by still frames from the videos used in the previous task.
Experimental: Alzheimer's disease patients
A "long" temporal perception task and a "short" temporal perception task
A "long" temporal perception task in which the duration of the stimulus, around 2 min, is materialized by a video. For each trial, two videos are displayed to the participants, and then the task of the participant is to indicate the longest video and to give his level of confidence in his answer. A "short" temporal perception task which will take place in the same way as the "long" task except that the duration of the stimulus, around 2 seconds, is materialized by still frames from the videos used in the previous task.
Active Comparator: Healthy Volunteers
A "long" temporal perception task and a "short" temporal perception task
A "long" temporal perception task in which the duration of the stimulus, around 2 min, is materialized by a video. For each trial, two videos are displayed to the participants, and then the task of the participant is to indicate the longest video and to give his level of confidence in his answer. A "short" temporal perception task which will take place in the same way as the "long" task except that the duration of the stimulus, around 2 seconds, is materialized by still frames from the videos used in the previous task.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability to discriminate durations
Time Frame: 25 months and 10 days
Ability to discriminate durations of a few seconds and durations of the order of minutes
25 months and 10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risks's prediction of temporal disorientation.
Time Frame: 26 months
Analysis of the answers (true/false) to the questionnaire assessing temporal orientation in daily life
26 months
Identification of neural correlations with temporal perception tests
Time Frame: 27 months
Brain magnetic resonance imaging analysis
27 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anne-Catherine BACHOUD-LEVI, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Temporal perception tasks

Subscribe