- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05943587
The Development and Evaluation of Pain Neuroscience Education in Children
July 5, 2023 updated by: Ozgun Kaya Kara, Akdeniz University
The Development and Evaluation of Culturally Sensitive Pain Neuroscience Education in Children With Chronic Pain
The International Association for the Study of Pain and The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 11 define chronic pain as pain lasting more than 3 months, regardless of the cause.
For children and adolescents, chronic pain is an extremely terrible and suffering problem.
Periods of persistent pain negatively affect the child's participation in school and recreational activities, leading to academic problems and social exclusion.
Moreover, children are at increased risk of experiencing chronic pain problems in adulthood.
Because of these difficulties children with chronic pain should be treated as soon as possible.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is an educational approach used in chronic pain rehabilitation.
The purpose of PNE is to change individual's perception of pain.
The most fundamental and crucial aspect of PNE is educating patients about the underlying causes of their pain.
The primary purpose of the project is to conduct a modified Delphi survey to obtain and synthesize expert opinions on PNE materials.
The second aim of this study is to investigate the effect of PNE on pain, quality of life and participation in children with chronic pain and compare it with the standard treatment program.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic pain is not directly cause death but it is a major source of disability and suffering.
Because of the enormous medical, economic, and social burden of chronic pain worldwide better understanding of pain biology has become a critical topic in order to develop targeted, novel, safe, and effective treatments.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is a multidisciplinary educational method used by physiotherapists worldwide in chronic pain rehabilitation.
The goal of PNE is to alter a person's perception of pain.
PNE aims to correct patient misconceptions about pain physiology.
As a result, pain education can help to reduce levels of fear of pain, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing thoughts, and passive coping strategies (for example, the use of painkillers or massage treatments).
Currently, only a few research have investigated the benefits of PNE in children.
The majority of studies have focused on pain management education programs rather than explaining the neurology of pain.
The combined effects of PNE and physiotherapy have not been studied in children.
But adult studies are demonstrated that PNE and physiotherapy are effective.
According to studies, PNE has been linked to promising results in the treatment of chronic pain and functional impairment in adults.
James et al. concluded that PNE reduced pain, disability, pain catastrophization, and kinesiophobia in the short and medium term, based on a systematic evaluation of 12 randomized controlled studies assessing the effect of PNE in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Currently, no study has been conducted in investigators country that has adapted PNE for children and evaluated the consequences of PNE use.
The primary aim of the research is to perform a modified Delphi survey to obtain and synthesize expert opinions on culturally appropriate PNE materials for children in terms of content, relevance of information, clarity and intelligibility of information, and visual qualities of the materials.
The second aim of the research is to investigate the impacts of culturally tailored PNE on pain symptoms (pain severity, pain awareness, fear of pain, catastrophizing pain, dealing with pain), quality of life, and involvement in children with chronic pain, as well as to compare it to a normal education program.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: ishak Isık, Prof. Dr.
- Phone Number: 02422494400
- Email: etik.kurul.07@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ishak Isık, Prof
- Phone Number: 02422494400
- Email: etik.kurul.07@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antalya, Turkey
- Akdeniz University
-
Contact:
- Ozgun KAYA KARA, Assoc. Prof.
- Email: ozgunkara@akdeniz.edu.tr
-
Sub-Investigator:
- ceren Gursen, Assoc.Prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Kelly Ickmans, Assoc.Prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Emma Rheel, PT
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ozgun Kaya Kara, Assoc.Prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Koray Kara, Assoc.Prof
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Gultekin Kutluk, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Yaprak Cetin, Assoc. Prof
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 8 years and 12 years;
- Diagnosed with chronic pain (at least three months of pain and a pain frequency of three or more days per week)
- Those who do not take analgesics 48 hours prior to study evaluations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with unmanageable psychological disorders (e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autistic spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) would be excluded from the study.
Patients who started a new treatment during the trial or 6 weeks before to the study for chronic pain.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Chronic pain group
30-45 minute individual sessions of culture-sensitive PNE4kids training will be applied.
|
Culturally adapted PNE4kids used by physiotherapists worldwide in chronic pain rehabilitation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
30-45 minute individual sessions of standard education training will be applied.
|
Standard education used by physiotherapists worldwide in chronic pain rehabilitation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wong-Baker Faces Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
It is a valid and reliable scale preferred by children and their families to evaluate the severity of pain.
It consists of 6 facial expressions that symbolize the severity of pain.
These show the stages of increased pain from a smiling face (0 points) to a very sad and crying face (10 points).
The meaning of each facial expression is carefully explained to the child.
Children rate pain intensity according to face shapes.It consists of 6 facial expressions that symbolize the severity of the pain.
It is scored between 0-10.
Increasing scores indicate more pain.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire Child & Adult Version
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire Child evaluates children's attention to pain.
There are 14 items on the scale.
A 0-5 likert scale is used for scoring.
It has a rating of 0 (never) to 5 (always) (always).
The total score is calculated by multiplying the individual item scores.
Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire-Adult uses 16 items to test adults' attention and pain awareness.
It has ten items for paying attention and six ones for being aware.
A 0-5 likert scale is used for scoring.
0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = almost always, and 5 = always.
The scale's eighth and sixteenth items are scored in reverse order.
The scaled total score ranges from 0 to 80. Higher ratings suggest that you are more conscious of your pain.Items are rated on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (always).
The 8th and 16th items of the scale are reverse scored.
The scale total score is obtained between 0-80.
Higher scores indicate greater awareness of pain.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children/Parents
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
The Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children-Short Form is a 10-item version of the 24-item Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children.
It uses children's self-reports to assess pain-related fears (4 items) and avoidance behaviours (6 items).
A 0-4 Likert scale is used for scoring.
A score of 0 indicates strong disagreement, while a score of 5 indicates strong agreement.Items are summed to derive a total score (with between 0-40) .
Higher scores indicate higher pain-related fear and avoidance behaviors.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale- Child
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Crombez et al. created the Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Child, an adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for children.
Catastrophizing behaviours is evaluated with 13 items: rumination (4 items), magnification (3 items), and helplessness (6 items).
The scoring is done on a 0-4 point Likert scale.
It is evaluated on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very extremely).Items are summed to derive a total score (with between 0-52), with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Functional Disability Inventory
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Walker and Greene developed the Functional Disability Inventory to assess challenges faced by school-age children and adolescents in executing activities of daily living from the child's perspective.
There are 15 items in Functional Disability Inventory.
Each item asks about how many physical challenges or obstacles the youngster has experienced while executing the activity in the previous few days.
The scoring is done on a 0-4 point Likert scale.
It is ranked between 0 (no problem) and 4 (impossible).
Items are summed to derive a total score (with between 0-60) , with higher total scores indicating greater disability.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Pain Coping Questionnaire
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Evaluates the coping strategies of children and adolescents with a total of 39 items in 8 subscales.
These are seeking knowledge, problem solving, seeking social support, positive self-suggestion, behavioural distraction, cognitive distraction, externalization, and internalization/catastrophizing.
Items are assessed on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating never and 5 indicating very often.
Higher ratings indicate higher use of coping strategy.
PCQ consists of parent and adolescent form.The scores for each subscale are calculated by averaging the items.
Higher scores indicate that the child uses strategies to cope more frequently.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participation and Environment- Children and Youth
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
The participation sections included 10 activities in the home setting, five activities in the school setting, and 10 in the community setting.
For each activity, the range of participation is daily to never, with scores between 0 and 8; higher scores indicate greater participation.
The range of involvement is from very involved to minimally involved, with scores between 1 and 5; higher scores indicate greater involvement.
The range of whether change is desired in the child's participation in this kind of activity is no or yes, with scores between 0 and 1.
Environmental features supports and barriers (e.g., do the features of the environment help or make it harder?)
for the child to participate in activities at home, school, or in a community setting with scores between 1 and 4; increased scores indicate environmental help.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory is a health-related quality-of-life scale for children and adolescents aged 2 to 18.
There are three areas in which you can score.
The first is the scale total score, followed by the physical health total score, and finally the psychosocial health total score, which is calculated from the item scores assessing emotional, social, and school functions.
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory is a 23-item quality of life scale that is appropriate for use in large groups such as schools and hospitals, as well as in both healthy and unhealthy children and adolescents.
The items are graded on a scale of 0 to 100.
The answer is scored 100 if it is marked as never, 75 if it is marked as rarely, 50 if it is marked as occasionally, 25 if it is marked as frequently, and 0 if it is marked as almost constantly.
The higher the total PedsQL score, the higher the perceived health-related quality of life.
|
change from baseline to end of the 1 week and 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Ozgun Kaya Kara, Assoc. Prof., Akdeniz University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, Dixon J, Atkinson G, Cooper K, Martin DJ. Pain Neuroscience Education for Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2019 Oct;20(10):1140.e1-1140.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
- Tracey I, Mantyh PW. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron. 2007 Aug 2;55(3):377-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.012.
- Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Jul;32(5):332-55. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194646. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
- Robins H, Perron V, Heathcote LC, Simons LE. Pain Neuroscience Education: State of the Art and Application in Pediatrics. Children (Basel). 2016 Dec 21;3(4):43. doi: 10.3390/children3040043.
- Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future. J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
- Siddall B, Ram A, Jones MD, Booth J, Perriman D, Summers SJ. Short-term impact of combining pain neuroscience education with exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e20-e30. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002308.
- Pas R, Meeus M, Malfliet A, Baert I, Oosterwijck SV, Leysen L, Nijs J, Ickmans K. Development and feasibility testing of a Pain Neuroscience Education program for children with chronic pain: treatment protocol. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):248-253. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
- Malfliet A, Leysen L, Pas R, Kuppens K, Nijs J, Van Wilgen P, Huysmans E, Goudman L, Ickmans K. Modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: applied to post-cancer, paediatric and sports-related pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 19.
- Nijs J, Torres-Cueco R, van Wilgen CP, Girbes EL, Struyf F, Roussel N, van Oosterwijck J, Daenen L, Kuppens K, Vanwerweeen L, Hermans L, Beckwee D, Voogt L, Clark J, Moloney N, Meeus M. Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2014 Sep-Oct;17(5):447-57.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 15, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 16, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 5, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
July 13, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 13, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 5, 2023
Last Verified
July 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-127
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on culture-sensitive PNE4kids
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityNot yet recruitingPain | Physical Activity | Pediatrics | Neuroscience Pain EducationTurkey
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichREFUGIO MunichCompleted
-
University Medical Center GroningenTechnical University of Munich; Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy... and other collaboratorsRecruitingColorectal Neoplasms | Carcinogenesis | Barrett Esophagus | Esophageal Adenocarcinoma | Colorectal Adenoma | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Colorectal PolypNetherlands
-
University of BelgradeActive, not recruiting
-
Rush University Medical CenterCompletedStress Disorders, Traumatic | Pelvic PainUnited States
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNSERC Collaborative Research and DevelopmentCompleted
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentNot yet recruitingMyocard Injury After Non Cardiac Surgery | Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
-
University of UlmDr. von Hauner Children's HospitalUnknown
-
Mackay Memorial HospitalNational Health Research Institutes, TaiwanCompleted