Evaluation of a Program for Routine Implementation of Symptom Distress Screening and Referral in Cancer Care

March 31, 2025 updated by: Wendy Wing Tak Lam, The University of Hong Kong

Evaluation of a Program for Routine Implementation of Symptom Distress Screening and Referral in Cancer Care: a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

This study proposes to evaluate the process and outcome of an implementation program designed to implement nurse-led symptom distress screening and referral into routine cancer care clinics. Specifically, using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial, This study aim to test if a systematic symptom distress screening program increases the proportion of eligible patients screened and referred compared to usual control. For process evaluation, this study will use qualitative methods to assess the experience and response to the implementation program.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study proposes to evaluate the process and outcome of an implementation program designed to implement nurse-led symptom distress screening and referral into routine cancer care clinics. Specifically, using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial, this study aim to test if a systematic symptom distress screening program (i.e. using the five implementation strategies including training, audit, feedback, facilitation and adaptable workflow) increases the proportion of eligible patients screened and referred compared to usual control under which no implementation strategies will be used to facilitate the adoption of the systematic symptom distress screening and referral. The investigator hypothesize that (1) the intervention will increase the proportion of eligible patients screened; (2) the intervention will increase the proportion of patients with moderate to severe symptom distress referred for psychosocial support.

For process evaluation, this study will use qualitative methods to assess the experience and response to the implementation program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2772

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Wendy Wing Tak Lam, PhD
  • Phone Number: +852 39179878
  • Email: wwtlam@hku.hk

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Kwong Wah Hospital-Breast Center
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tung Wah Hospital-Department of Surgery
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Not yet recruiting
        • North District Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Mary Hospital-Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Queen Mary Hospital-Department of Surgery
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Queen Mary Hospital-Department of Oncology
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Active, not recruiting
        • JCICC
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital-Department of oncology
        • Contact:
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Active, not recruiting
        • The University of Hong Kong Jockey Club Institute of Cancer Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All cancer patients within two years post-treatment attending the specialized outpatient clinics for surveillance will be eligible for symptom distress screening, with no exclusions by any demographic and clinical characteristics.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All cancer patients beyond two years post-treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implementation condition
Under implementation condition, a nurse-led symptom distress screening program will be implemented using 5 implementation strategies including training, audit and feedback, facilitation and adaptable workflow.
Five implementation strategies will be conducted individually for each of the study unit at the timepoint when the study unit is being randomly allocated to the implementation condition. For each study unit, all nurses will first receive a half-day training. Each study unit under the implementation condition will receive weekly audit and feedback reports to summarize the proportion of eligible patients, proportion of eligible patients being screened, proportion of patients appropriately referred to JCICC. The senior research assistant with a nursing background will receive training and mentoring from the PI and will be the guided facilitator. The guided facilitator will conduct weekly site visits to address operational issues arise during the implementation. Lastly, while the choice of symptom assessment tool and referral criteria are standardized and cannot be modified, the routine workflow for each study unit can be adjusted according to its context and resources.
No Intervention: Control condition
The control condition is the usual clinical outpatient operation without the specific implementation program (i.e. applying the five implementation strategies including training, audit and feedback, facilitation and adaptable workflow) for standardized routine symptom distress screening. Prior to the start of the first 4-month control condition, we will meet each study unit and brief the staff about the purpose of this implementation study, as well as the introduction of the symptom distress screening tool. The symptom distress screening tool and referral forms will be given to the study sites. The staff are encouraged to screened and referred all eligible patients to JCICC, a local cancer care centre. In contrast to the intervention condition, there will be no half-day skill training workshop and no weekly audit and feedback report delivered and discussed with the site facilitator. We will keep the recording of the briefing session for fidelity assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of eligible patient screened
Time Frame: Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
The primary outcome (the measurement of the reach) is the changes in the number of eligible patients screened. Using a standardized reporting form, each study site will be asked to submit a weekly record of a total number of eligible patients per clinic and the number of patients screened.
Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Change in the number of eligible patient referred
Time Frame: Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
The primary outcome (the measurement of the reach) is the changes in the number of eligible patients referred based on the predefined scores. Using a standardized reporting form, each study site will be asked to submit a weekly record of a total number of eligible patients per clinic and the number of patients referred.
Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in referral uptake
Time Frame: Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
The secondary outcome is the change in uptake of the referral, i.e. the proportion of referred patients accepting services.
Pre- and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Process evaluation in providers by conducting qualitative interviews
Time Frame: post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Using qualitative approach with service providers (i.e. the nurses) to identify facilitators and barriers for the implementation of the symptom distress screening program, as well as their overall experience. All nursing staff from the study units involved in the symptom distress screening will be invited to join the qualitative study at the post-implementation phase.
post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Process evaluation in patients by conducting qualitative interviews
Time Frame: post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
We will also conduct qualitative interviews to explore patients' experiences with symptom distress screening and referral if appropriate. Patients who are referred for support services will be approached by the research assistant who will explain the purpose of the study and nature of participation, with an emphasis on confidentiality and anonymity. If agreeing to participate, the RA will obtain a written consent and each subject will subsequently participate in in-depth interview by a trained interviewer. For patients who decline to be referred for support services, we will ask the nursing staff to invite the patients to join the qualitative study. We will recruit patients from both implementation and control conditions as it will enable us to compare patients' experienc.
post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Number of staff receiving training
Time Frame: pre-implementation phase, up to 24 months
All nurses will first receive a half-day training on how to administer the symptom distress screening tool, evaluate patients' reported symptom distress, refer patients to and follow-up for referred patients. We will record the number of invited staff attending the half-day training workshop.
pre-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Change in staff knowledge about the implementation of the screening programme assessed using categorical Likert scales
Time Frame: pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
We will assess the staff knowledge at pre- and post-training workshop and again at the end of the implementation study using a 6 points-categorical Likert scale (0-5) for participants' knowledge about the implementation of the screening program. Such information will be served as implementation indicators to facilitate the interpretation of the study findings.
pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Change in staff's belief in the symptom distress screening programme assessed using categorical Likert scales
Time Frame: pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
We will assess the staff's belief at pre- and post-training workshop and again at the end of the implementation study using a 6 points-categorical Likert scale (0-5) for participants' beliefs towards the symptom distress screening programme. Such information will be served as implementation indicators to facilitate the interpretation of the study findings.
pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
Change in staff self-efficacy in administrating the symptom distress screening programme assessed using categorical Likert scales
Time Frame: pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months
We will assess the staff's self-efficacy at pre- and post-training workshop and again at the end of the implementation study using a 6 points-categorical Likert scale (0-5). Such information will be served as implementation indicators to facilitate the interpretation of the study findings.
pre- and post-training workshop, and post-implementation phase, up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wendy Wing Tak Lam, PhD, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW22-645

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available from the PI upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Information will be available from the PI upon reasonable request. The author to review requests is the PI.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on A nurse-led symptom distress screening program

Subscribe