Effects of Consumption of Phosphatidylserine on the Cognitive Function

August 1, 2024 updated by: Orthomedico Inc.

Effects of Consumption of Phosphatidylserine on the Cognitive Function: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Comparison Study

The main objective of this trial is to verify the effects of consumption of phosphatidylserine for 12 weeks on the cognitive function in healthy Japanese subjects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, the investigators will evaluate the cognitive function before and after the intervention. The groups to be compared are omega-3-phosphatidylserine derived from herring roe, phosphatidylserine derived from soybean, and a placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tokyo
      • Nerima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 176-0002
        • Nerima Medical Association Minami-machi Clinic
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141-0022
        • Medical Corporation Seishinkai, Takara Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Japanese
  2. Male and female
  3. Subjects aged 35-65
  4. Healthy subjects
  5. Subjects who notice a decline in memory
  6. Subjects whose scoring of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is 24 or more
  7. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria 1. ~ 6. and have relatively low standardized score in composite memory measured using Cognitrax at Scr (Selection of those with relatively low standardized scores will be conducted in blocks of "Subjects aged 50 or over" and "Subjects aged under 50")
  8. Subjects who are judged as eligible to participate in the study by the physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects undergoing medical treatment or having a medical history of malignant tumor, heart failure, or myocardial infarction
  2. Subjects carrying a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  3. Subjects undergoing treatment for any of the following chronic diseases: cardiac arrhythmia, liver disease, kidney disease, cerebrovascular disorder, rheumatism, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, or any other chronic diseases
  4. Subjects who have dementia
  5. Subjects who have mental health issues such as depression disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or other issues
  6. Subjects who use or take "Foods for Specified Health Uses", "Foods with Function Claims", or other functional food/beverage, as part of their daily intake
  7. Subjects who take supplements or foods that may improve cognitive functions, such as phosphatidylserine, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), ginkgo leaf extract, tocotrienol, astaxanthin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and plasmalogen, as part of their daily intake
  8. Subjects who take blue-backed fish such as sardines, mackerel, and saury for 4 days/week or over
  9. Subjects who use devices, equipment, and applications that may affect cognitive functions (e.g., brain training puzzles, brain training games) as part of their daily life
  10. Subjects regularly taking medications (including herbal medicines) and supplements
  11. Subjects who are allergic to medications and/or the test food related products
  12. Subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or planning for pregnancy during the trial period
  13. Subjects who have been enrolled in other clinical trials 28 days before the agreement to participate in this trial or those who plan to enroll in another clinical trial during the trial period
  14. Subjects who are deemed ineligible to participate by the principal investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Omega-3-phosphatidylserine derived from herring roe
Take 300 mg/day of omega-3-phosphatidylserine derived from herring roe.
Take 4 capsules per day after breakfast with warm water.
Active Comparator: Phosphatidylserine derived from soybean
Take 300 mg/day of phosphatidylserine derived from soybean.
Take 4 capsules per day after breakfast with warm water.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Take 0 mg/day of phosphatidylserine.
Take 4 capsules per day after breakfast with warm water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The measured value of the standardized score of composite memory at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Verbal Memory (VBM) test and Visual Memory (VIM) test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of composite memory is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The amount of change of the standardized score of composite memory between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
VBM test and VIM test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of composite memory is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of neurocognition index (NCI) at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Seven neurocognitive tests {VBM, VIM, Finger Tapping (FTT), Symbol Digit Coding (SDC), Stroop Test (ST), Shifting Attention (SAT), and Continuous Performance (CPT)} are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of NCI is calculated from results of these seven tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of NCI between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
Seven neurocognitive tests {VBM, VIM, FTT, SDC, ST, SAT, and CPT} are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of NCI is calculated from results of these seven tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of verbal memory at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
VBM test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of verbal memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of verbal memory between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
VBM test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of verbal memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of visual memory at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
VIM test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of visual memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of visual memory between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
VIM test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of visual memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of psychomotor speed at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
FTT test and SDC test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of psychomotor speed is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of psychomotor speed between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
FTT test and SDC test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of psychomotor speed is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of reaction time at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
ST test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of reaction time is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of reaction time between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
ST test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of reaction time is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of complex attention at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
ST test, SAT test, and CPT test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of complex attention is calculated from results of these three tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of complex attention between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
ST test, SAT test, and CPT test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of complex attention is calculated from results of these three tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of cognitive flexibility at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
ST test and SAT test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of cognitive flexibility is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of cognitive flexibility between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
ST test and SAT test are measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of cognitive flexibility is calculated from results of these two tests. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of processing speed at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
SDC test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of processing speed is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of processing speed between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
SDC test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of processing speed is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of executive function at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
SAT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of executive function is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of executive function between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
SAT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of executive function is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of social acuity at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Perception of Emotions (POET) test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of social acuity is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of social acuity between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
POET test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of social acuity is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of reasoning at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Non-Verbal Reasoning (NVRT) test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of reasoning is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of reasoning between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
NVRT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of reasoning is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of working memory at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
4-Part Continuous Performance (FPCPT) test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of working memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of working memory between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
FPCPT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of working memory is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of sustained attention at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
FPCPT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of sustained attention is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of sustained attention between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
FPCPT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of sustained attention is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of simple attention at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
CPT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of simple attention is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of simple attention between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
CPT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of simple attention is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12
The measured value of the standardized score of motor speed at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
FTT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of motor speed is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Week 12
The amount of change of the standardized score of motor speed between Base line and Week 12
Time Frame: Base line and Week 12
FTT test is measured using Cognitrax® which is powered by CNS Vital Signs®, a neurocognitive test system. The standardized score of motor speed is calculated from the result of this test. This score has been normalized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 based on age-matched reference data. Higher scores are always better.
Base line and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tsuyoshi Takara, MD, Medical Corporation Seishinkai, Takara Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 06788-0019-10

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be discussed among the research affiliates after the study is completed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Japanese Subjects

Clinical Trials on DHAPS® product

Subscribe