- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05964465
Mechanisms of Smell Improvement With Dupilumab.
July 10, 2026 updated by: Shaun Nguyen, Medical University of South Carolina
Mechanisms of Smell Improvement With Dupilumab
This study seeks to explore the mechanism through which dupilumab improves olfactory cleft inflammation in patients with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
The investigators expect this study to provide convincing evidence that dupilumab improves clinical olfaction via direct reduction in olfactory cleft inflammation.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Post-marketed administration of dupilumab (FDA approved medication for CRSwNP) in patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) will result in significant improvement in objective measures of olfactory cleft inflammation and psychophysical olfaction.
The investigators seek to explore the mechanism through which dupilumab improves olfactory cleft inflammation in patients with CRSwNP.
The investigators also want to determine whether change in olfactory cleft inflammation correlates with improvement in olfaction (one of the cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP) at 3 months.
The investigators hypothesize that after 3 months of treatment with dupilumab, non-inflammatory factors will explain a significant degree of variation in residual clinical olfaction.
Additionally, the investigators want to explore the determinants of ongoing olfactory loss after 3 months of treatment with attention to non-inflammatory factors.
The investigators expect this study to provide convincing evidence that dupilumab improves clinical olfaction via direct reduction in olfactory cleft inflammation.
Specifically, the investigators expect to show that reduction in olfactory cleft inflammation is the result of reduction in IL13 levels in olfactory cleft mucus.
Finally, the investigators expect to show that most of the variation in post-treatment olfaction can be explained by non-inflammatory measures that are independent of CRSwNP.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22904
- University of Virginia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults ≥18 years of age
- Meet criteria for CRSwNP as defined by ICAR-21
- 2 out of 4 cardinal symptoms for ≥12 weeks
- Visible evidence of inflammation on endoscopy or imaging
- Bilateral visible nasal polyps ≥1 in each nasal cavity (0-4 scale each side)
- Olfaction score ≥1 (0-3 scale)
- Candidate for treatment with dupilumab for CRSwNP
- Elected to proceed with dupilumab for treatment of CRSwNP
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior use of dupilumab
- Previous treatment with another biologic medication for CRSwNP or asthma within 6 months
- Any nasal or sinus surgery within the last 3 months
- Oral corticosteroid use within the last 1 month
- Current pregnancy, breast-feeding, or plan to become pregnant during next 3 months
- Presence of antrochoanal nasal polyps; acute rhinosinusitis; upper respiratory infection;
- Allergic granulomatous angiitis/eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
- Granulomatosis with polyangiitis; cystic fibrosis; Young syndrome;
- Kartagener syndrome; or dyskinetic cilia syndrome
- Poorly controlled asthma
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment
The treatment group will receive dupilumab at 300mg SC Q2weeks.
The first dose will be administered via subcutaneous injection in clinic at baseline.
Subjects will self-administer study drug (dupilumab 300 mg) subcutaneous every 2 weeks after initial dosing at visit 2.
|
Monoclonal antibody blocking interleukin 4 and interleukin 13
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Volumetric Olfactory Cleft Opacification Based on CT.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Non-contrast sinus computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained at Baseline and Week 12. Volumetric analysis of the olfactory cleft was performed using previously described methods.
Total olfactory cleft volume and air volume were measured to calculate percent olfactory cleft opacification as [1 - (air volume/total olfactory cleft volume)] × 100.
Percent olfactory cleft opacification ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater olfactory cleft inflammation and disease severity and lower values indicating less inflammation and improvement.
|
Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
|
Change in Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Score Based on Nasalendoscopy.
Time Frame: 3 months post-treatment
|
Subjects will have sinonasal endoscopy at baseline and every follow up visit.
This procedure allows visual inspection of the sinus mucosal lining and grading of polyps, including the olfactory cleft.
Results for each side will be recorded separately and combined for a final Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Scale (OCES) that ranges from 0-20, with higher scores representing increased disease severity.
|
3 months post-treatment
|
|
Change in Olfactory Cleft Mucus IL-13 Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Olfactory cleft mucus samples were collected under endoscopic guidance at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 12. IL-13 concentrations were measured using a commercially available LegendPlex Th2 Cytometric Bead Array according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The outcome reported here represents IL-13 concentration measured at Baseline and Week 12 to evaluate change after 3 months of dupilumab treatment.
|
Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
|
Change in Lund-Kennedy Endoscopy Score.
Time Frame: 3 months post-treatment
|
Subjects will have sinonasal endoscopy at baseline and every follow up visit.
This procedure allows visual inspection of the sinus mucosal lining and grading of polyps, including the olfactory cleft.
Results for each side will be recorded separately and combined for a final Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score (LKES) that ranges from 0-20, with higher scores representing increased disease severity.
|
3 months post-treatment
|
|
Change in Overall Polyp Score From Sinonasal Endoscopy
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Overall Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) was assessed by sinonasal endoscopy.
Polyps were graded separately in each nasal cavity on a scale from 0 to 4 and summed to calculate a total bilateral score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater nasal polyp burden and more severe disease, while lower scores indicate less disease and improvement.
|
Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Change in Olfactory Cleft Mucus IL-13 Level and Sniffin' Sticks TDI Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Quantitative psychophysical olfactory testing was performed using the Sniffin' Sticks Test.
This validated test assesses odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I).
Individual component scores are summed to generate a Total TDI Score that reflects overall olfactory function, with higher scores indicating better olfactory function.
The correlation between olfactory cleft mucus IL-13 levels and change in Total TDI Score from Baseline to Week 12 was assessed using Spearman correlation.
|
Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
|
Correlation Between Change in IL13 Level and QOD-NS Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Olfactory-specific quality of life was assessed using the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders - Negative Statements (QOD-NS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure of olfactory-specific quality of life.
The QOD-NS total score ranges from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating better olfactory-specific quality of life and lower scores indicating greater olfactory-related impairment.
The correlation between change in olfactory cleft mucus IL-13 level and change in QOD-NS score from Baseline to Week 12 was assessed using Spearman correlation.
|
Baseline and Week 12 (3 months post-treatment)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 10, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 30, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
January 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 25, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
July 28, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 5, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 10, 2026
Last Verified
July 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00125142
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.