Sensory Integration Therapy and Cerebral Palsy

July 21, 2023 updated by: Atahan TURHAN, Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

The Affect of Sensory Integration Therapy and Conventional Exercise Therapy on Spasticity, Balance and Motor Function With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

This intervention study was planned to investigate the effects of Sensory Integration Therapy that added to the conventional therapy program on spasticity, balance, motor function and functional independency levels of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cerebral Palsy is a disease that can cause motor skill and posture disorders due to a non-progressive lesion in the brain that has not yet completed its development. Cerebral palsy is among the most common causes of disability in childhood. There are many conditions that can cause Cerebral Palsy. Risk groups that cause brain damage can be considered as prenatal, perinatal and postnatal risk factors.The lesion that occurs in the central nervous system in patients with Cerebral Palsy causes some problems in the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory systems. In addition to these problems, depending on the level of the lesion, posture, movement disorders and balance problems occur in individuals with Cerebral Palsy. Sensory integration therapy is a neurological process of perceiving, interpreting and organizing our senses for an effective integration of the individual with the environment. When the literature is examined, the number of studies investigating the effect of sensory integration program in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy is insufficient. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of sensory integration therapy on spasticity, balance and motor function in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy and to provide the data obtained at the end of the study to the literature both theoretically and practically.

The hypothesis of the study is:

  • Sensory integration program reduces spasticity in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.
  • Sensory integration program increases balance in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.
  • Sensory integration program increases motor function in children with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Kirsehir, Merkez, Turkey, 40100
        • Atahan Turhan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 4-17
  • Diagnosed with spastic diplegic type Cerebral Palsy
  • Having Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I and II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who underwent phenol and botulinum toxin-a injections in the last 6 months before the study
  • Had a previous surgical operation, and had a cardiopulmonary disease that could prevent exercise
  • Children with communication, hearing and vision problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Conventional Exercises

This conventional exercises included stretching and strengthening, balance-coordination, mobility and range of motion exercises.

The control group received conventional therapy 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Each therapy session a day lasted 45 minutes in control group.

Experimental: Intervention Group
Conventional Exercises + Sensory Integration Therapy

This conventional exercises included stretching and strengthening, balance-coordination, mobility and range of motion exercises.

The control group received conventional therapy 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Each therapy session a day lasted 45 minutes in control group.

The Sensory Integration Therapy was applied to the intervention group in addition to the conventional exercise program. Sensory Integration Therapy included tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular activities. The tactile sensory activities consisted of materials such as stepping stones, tactile box, brushing, fabric walking path. The vestibular sensory activities consisted of materials such as hammock swings, trampolines, rope nets, rock walls, river stones. Proprioceptive sensory activities consisted of materials such as weight bearing activities, heavy lifting, deep pressure, big ball activities, tug of war and ball pits.

The intervention group underwent each session 45 minute conventional therapy and 15 minutes SIT. The therapy program continued 3 days a week for 8 weeks in intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle Tone
Time Frame: A day before the rehabilitation
Modified Ashworth Scale (The muscle tone evaluated on this scale is graded between 0 and 4 and is scored between 0 and 5)
A day before the rehabilitation
Muscle Tone
Time Frame: 8 week
Modified Ashworth Scale (The muscle tone evaluated on this scale is graded between 0 and 4 and is scored between 0 and 5)
8 week
Functional Balance
Time Frame: A day before the rehabilitation
Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (The scale consists of 14 section. Each section is scored from 0 lowest function to 4 highest function. )
A day before the rehabilitation
Functional Balance
Time Frame: 8 week
Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (The scale consists of 14 section. Each section is scored from 0 lowest function to 4 highest function.)
8 week
Gross Motor Function
Time Frame: A day before the rehabilitation
Gross Motor Function Measure (The scores are in 4 categories as "0" not starting the activity, starting independently "1", partially completing "2" and independently completing "3".)
A day before the rehabilitation
Gross Motor Function
Time Frame: 8 week
Gross Motor Function Measure (The scores are in 4 categories as "0" not starting the activity, starting independently "1", partially completing "2" and independently completing "3".)
8 week
Functional Independence
Time Frame: A day before the rehabilitation
Functional Independence Measure for Children (These items are scored from 1 to 7 according to whether they received help while performing each function)
A day before the rehabilitation
Functional Independence
Time Frame: 8 week
Functional Independence Measure for Children (These items are scored from 1 to 7 according to whether they received help while performing each function)
8 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Classification
Time Frame: A day before the rehabilitation
Gross Motor Function Classification System (Children with Cerebral Palsy are classified in 5 levels (1-5) according to their motor skills, functional abilities, assistive technology and wheelchair requirements)
A day before the rehabilitation
Gross Motor Function Classification
Time Frame: 8 week
Gross Motor Function Classification System (Children with Cerebral Palsy are classified in 5 levels (1-5) according to their motor skills, functional abilities, assistive technology and wheelchair requirements)
8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Atahan TURHAN, PhD, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Conventional Exercises

Subscribe