Adaptability to Stress of Healthcare Workers in the 8th Arrondissement (ASTRE)

October 12, 2023 updated by: CPTS Paris 8

Adaptability to Stress of Healthcare Workers in the 8th Arrondissement - Evaluation of Stress Perceived by Healthcare Professionals and Workers. Real-life Prospective Study.

Participants will be selected according to their affiliation with the Paris 8 CPTS. They will be asked to complete a series of self-questionnaires to determine their stress levels and lifestyle habits. These tests will be used to define a wellness pathway for each participant in order to reduce the stress they feel at work. These wellness pathways are based around 4 distinct themes:

  • Diet, nutrition and micronutrition
  • Physical activity
  • Sleep
  • Stress and wellness. Participants will be follow-up at 3 and 6 months by means of self-questionnaires and advice on the programme.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75008
        • CPTS Paris 8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Health professionals and actors affiliated to the Communauté professionnelle territoriale de santé (CPTS) Paris 8.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People of legal age
  • Health professionals and players from the CPTS Paris 8 association:

    • Pharmacist,
    • Doctor
    • Midwife
    • Physiotherapist,
    • Dentist,
    • Nurse,
    • Pharmacy assistant,
    • Dietician-nutritionist,
    • Speech therapist,
    • Chiropodist,
    • Adapted physical activity teacher,
    • Medical secretary,
    • Other health service staff (maintenance, reception, general services and IT staff).
  • Persons having given their non-opposition to participate in the study.
  • Persons affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of such a scheme (article L1121-11)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People already following a wellness programme.
  • People undergoing treatment for stress prescribed by a doctor.
  • People on sick leave or long-term leave who are no longer at work and who cannot be included in the study.
  • People with a poor understanding of spoken and/or written French.
  • Vulnerable persons in accordance with article L1121-6 of the CSP.
  • Persons subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship) or unable to express their consent/non-opposition in accordance with article L1121-8 of the CSP or under court protection in accordance with article L1122-2 of the CSP.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the 3-month effectiveness of a well-being programme in improving stress management among healthcare professionals and workers with moderate stress.
Time Frame: 3 Months
Changes in the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score at 3 months after the SMS setting up the wellness pathway. The PSS is a score based on the sum of the values assigned to each response of 10 different items. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 50. The higher the score, the more stressed the respondent is.
3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the effectiveness of a well-being programme in improving stress management in healthcare professionals and workers with moderate stress at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 Months
Change in the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) at 6 months from the SMS used to set up the wellness pathway. The PSS is a score based on the sum of the values assigned to each response of 10 different items. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 50. The higher the score, the more stressed the respondent is.
6 Months
Evaluate the effectiveness of a well-being programme in improving the lifestyle habits of healthcare professionals and workers at 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: 3 and 6 Months
Evolution of the score obtained in the Lifestyle Questionnaire at 3 and 6 months after the SMS for the implementation of the wellness pathway. The Lifestyle Questionnaireis a score based on the assignment of a score for 4 health risk domains: Stress, Diet, Physical Activity and Sleep. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100 for each of the 4 items. The lower the score, the more the respondent to the questionnaire has a risk profile.
3 and 6 Months
Compare the effectiveness of a well-being programme in improving stress management among healthcare professionals and workers, depending on their job
Time Frame: 3 and 6 Months
Changes in the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) according to the professions of the healthcare professionals. The PSS is a score based on the sum of the values assigned to each response of 10 different items. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 50. The higher the score, the more stressed the respondent is.
3 and 6 Months
Observe the acceptability to healthcare professionals and workers of setting up a well-being programme
Time Frame: 3 and 6 Months
The participation rate of the participants will be collected through a series of closed questions with multiple choice answers on the type of course taken and the dates of the follow-ups. The satisfaction rate of the participants' well-being journey will be collected through a closed question with a dichotomous answer of the Yes / No type.
3 and 6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric MYON, CPTS Paris 8

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO-0038

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occupational Stress

Clinical Trials on Wellness trail

Subscribe