Involving Communities in Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis: Making an IMPACT (Project IMPACT)

June 12, 2025 updated by: Morehouse School of Medicine
With support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, The Center for Maternal Health Equity at Morehouse School of Medicine is conducting a research study to test the implementation of Pre-Pregnancy Counseling in community-based settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Severe racial disparities in pregnancy-related cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are preventable and warrant timely community-engaged action. Black women are 3 times more likely to die from a pregnancy-related cause, as compared to white women10 -in part, due to higher rates of cardiovascular risk during pregnancy. More than 80% of pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable. Preconception counseling has been shown to improve maternal health for all women, with clear benefits to address cardiovascular risk factors of obesity, diabetes, hypertension. In order to have impact, evidence-based preconception counseling programs must be delivered through community settings that have a mission to reach at-risk populations of women. Healthy Start/community-based settings are appropriate for this, as they serve an at-risk population of Black women in many locations nationally. The investigators have engaged with Healthy Start and similar community-based settings in Georgia, South Carolina, to identify preconception counseling interventions that are evidence-based and feasible for their staff and community members. This community-engaged approach identified Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) interventions as feasible and acceptable to both staff and patients. In the pilot-test of their SBIRT model approach (Project IMPACT intervention), the investigators demonstrated capacity to screen for pregnancy risks and provide early intervention to n = 23 at-risk persons of reproductive age who wanted to get pregnant within the year. The investigators will build on their pilot work to conduct a hybrid effectiveness/implementation trial (type 2 hybrid) with n = 10 sites serving low-income African American men and women in Georgia, NC, SC, and TN. The investigators will use EPIS as an overarching framework to guide progress across the four phases (exploration, preparation, implementation and sustainment). In Aim 1 (EPIS Preparation phase), the investigators will work with their community partners to tailor the implementation strategy packages (Aim 1a) and their Project IMPACT intervention (Aim 1b) to the context of 10 sites across 4 states -- this tailoring will address contextual determinants of successful implementation from the Pragmatic Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). In Aim 2 (EPIS Implementation phase), we will test an Enhanced vs. Standard implementation strategy package of structured follow-up on the number of pre-conception counseling visits completed and will test any structured follow-up vs. no structured follow-up on readiness to change for key cardiovascular risk factors. In Aim 3 (EPIS Sustainment phase), the investigators will work with their community sites to co-develop an implementation and sustainment guide for the most effective strategy bundle from Aim 2. This work has potential to impact racial disparities in pregnancy-related morbidity/mortality and to advance our collective scientific understanding of the relative benefits of alternate implementation strategy packages.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

850

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Madison Haiman, PhD
  • Phone Number: 470-670-7071
  • Email: mhaiman@msm.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30310
        • Recruiting
        • Morehouse School of Medicine
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30310
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Morehouse School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identify as Black/ African-American
  • Fluent English-Speaker
  • Not pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Own a phone
  • Receive services at the community-based site

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard Structured Follow-Up
Emailed informational flyer(s) on prioritized cardiovascular risks and text messaging for logistical reasons. These will be in addition to the SBIRT intervention delivered by Healthy Start and other similar community organization staff that all participants will receive.
Project IMPACT intervention will follow a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Model. In the proposed study, staff at community sites will deliver a tailored SBIRT model for people seeking to get pregnant as our "Project IMPACT intervention". SBIRT was originally developed as a public health model designed to provide universal screening, secondary prevention (detecting risky or hazardous substance use before the onset of abuse or dependence), early intervention, and treatment for people who have problematic or hazardous alcohol problems within primary care and other health care settings. Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) has adapted this SBIRT model for people who are seeking to get pregnant to assess their risks and provide early intervention to at-risk people of reproductive age who want to get pregnant. Brief preconception counseling interventions addressing multiple behavioral risk factors have been found to be effective in prior studies.
Experimental: Enhanced Structured Follow-Up
Text or phone message(s) focused on the same prioritized risks + emailed informational flyer(s). These will be in addition to the SBIRT intervention delivered by Healthy Start and other similar community organization staff that all participants will receive.
Project IMPACT intervention will follow a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Model. In the proposed study, staff at community sites will deliver a tailored SBIRT model for people seeking to get pregnant as our "Project IMPACT intervention". SBIRT was originally developed as a public health model designed to provide universal screening, secondary prevention (detecting risky or hazardous substance use before the onset of abuse or dependence), early intervention, and treatment for people who have problematic or hazardous alcohol problems within primary care and other health care settings. Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) has adapted this SBIRT model for people who are seeking to get pregnant to assess their risks and provide early intervention to at-risk people of reproductive age who want to get pregnant. Brief preconception counseling interventions addressing multiple behavioral risk factors have been found to be effective in prior studies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation
Time Frame: 6 months
Each participant will remain in the study for six months and will complete three interviews (baseline, 3-month, 6-month follow-up). The number of pre-conception counseling sessions received by community members in the standard and enhanced intervention arms will be captured at 6 months. The proposed range for the primary implementation outcome will be 0-7 visits/contacts.
6 months
Effectiveness
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months

1) 0-10 readiness ruler (inclusive of all 5 stages of change)

Each participant will remain in the study for six months and will complete three interviews (baseline, 3-month, 6-month follow-up). The stage of change score will be captured at baseline, 3 and 6 months. A text message reminder will be sent to patients at 3 and 6 months to help minimize missing data. The stage of change score will be captured for control subjects in year 1 and intervention subjects during the implementation phase. All participants from both implementation strategies will be combined into one group, and this group will be compared to the control group participants.

baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Effectiveness
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months

2) 0-10 readiness ruler (inclusive of all 5 stages of change)

Each participant will remain in the study for six months and will complete three interviews (baseline, 3-month, 6-month follow-up). The stage of change score will be captured at baseline, 3 and 6 months. A text message reminder will be sent to patients at 3 and 6 months to help minimize missing data. The stage of change score will be captured for control subjects in year 1 and intervention subjects during the implementation phase. All participants from both implementation strategies will be combined into one group, and this group will be compared to the control group participants.

baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Natalie D. Hernandez, PhD, Associate professor
  • Principal Investigator: Cheryl Franklin, MD, AssociateProfessor
  • Study Director: Oluyemi Farinu, PhD, Project Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MH-CIP Project IMPACT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preconception Health

Clinical Trials on SBIRT Intervention

Subscribe