Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Umbilical Hernia Repair (UHR) Absorbable vs Non-absorbable Synthetic Mesh

Absorbable and Synthetic Mesh: A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-Inferior, Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to see which of two types of mesh is better for fixing an umbilical hernia. One type of mesh is an absorbable synthetic mesh, which goes away on its own in the body, and the other type of mesh is a non-absorbable mesh, which stays in the body forever. The researchers will check if the hernia comes back, how it affects the patient's quality of life, and if there are any problems after the surgery during a three-year period.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to compare the use of absorbable synthetic (AS) mesh versus non-absorbable mesh (NAS) mesh to determine the 3-year recurrence, quality of life (QOL) and postoperative complications in umbilical hernia repair. Patients will be randomized into one of two arms to receive an absorbable (Enform) mesh or non-absorbable (Marlex) mesh. Patients will undergo an umbilical hernia repair with the mesh assigned to their randomization cohort. The hernia recurrence, quality of life and postoperative outcomes to determine if the two meshes are non-inferior.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolinas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Primary umbilical hernia repair (UHR) [as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) guidelines primary midline abdominal wall defect from 3 cm above to 3 cm below the umbilicus]
  • Undergoing elective laparoscopic or open repair
  • Defect size of 1-4cm2
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class 1 & 2 wounds

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-Absorbable Synthetic Mesh
Subjects randomized to the non-absorbable synthetic mesh arm will undergo the procedure (umbilical hernia repair) to receive Marlex mesh.
Use of non-absorbable mesh in umbilical hernia repair
Active Comparator: Absorbable Synthetic Mesh
Subjects randomized to the absorbable synthetic mesh arm will undergo the procedure (umbilical hernia repair) to receive Enform mesh.
Use of absorbable mesh in umbilical hernia repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Umbilical Hernia Recurrence
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of hernia recurrence 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mesh Related Complication - Mesh infection
Time Frame: 1-year postoperatively
The rate of mesh infection within 1-year postoperatively
1-year postoperatively
Mesh Related Complication - Mesh excision
Time Frame: 1-year postoperatively
The rate of mesh excision within 1-year postoperatively
1-year postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - 30-day readmission
Time Frame: 30-days postoperatively
The rate of 30-day readmission
30-days postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - Seroma
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate seroma within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - Hematoma
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of hematoma within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcomes - Intra-abdominal abscess
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of intra-abdominal abscess within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - Wound cellulitis
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of wound cellulitis within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - Wound infection
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of wound infection within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcome - Superficial wound breakdown
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of superficial wound breakdown within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcomes - Mortality
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The rate of mortality within 3-years postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Postoperative Outcomes - Length of stay
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
The length of stay (LOS) in the hospital postoperatively
3-years postoperatively
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: 3-years postoperatively
QOL within 3-years of surgery as measured by the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), a validated hernia specific QOL questionnaire. The CCS has 23 questions across 3 domains (mesh sensation, pain, and movement) that are scored 0-5 and N/A. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. A score of 2 or more in any category is considered "symptomatic"; a score of 0 or 1 is considered "asymptomatic". Data will be reported as the frequency and percentage of "symptomatic" or "asymptomatic" for each of the 3 domains.
3-years postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd Heniford, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Umbilical Hernia

Clinical Trials on Marlex

Subscribe