Effects of Neuro-dynamic Mobilization Techniques on Upper Limb Functions in Pronator Teres Syndrome

August 13, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University
The study aimed to determine the effects of neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions and to compare the effects of slider versus tensioner neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions in pronator teres syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study aimed to determine the effects of neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions and to compare the effects of slider versus tensioner neuro-dynamic techniques on upper limb motor and sensory functions in pronator teres syndrome.

Pronator teres syndrome is a rare condition and easily overlooked and mistaken for the more prevalent carpal tunnel syndrome. The median nerve may also be squeezed between the heads of the pronator teres muscle in addition to the carpal tunnel. Patients report pain, numbness, or paresthesia over the lateral 3.5-digit area and anterior forearm, which worsens with forced pronation. This condition is most common in the dominant hand or sometimes can be associated with advanced forearm muscle.in our routine clinical practice, The neuro-dynamic techniques is not that common in neurological physical therapy practice so the effects of neuro -dynamics with conventional therapy needs to be evaluated for better outcomes in upper limb functions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Islamabad, Punjab, Pakistan, 46060
        • Al-Nafees hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with pronator teres syndrome
  • At least 6 working hours/ day
  • Positive Tinel's sign at pronator area (Hoffman's sign)
  • Positive Pronator teres syndrome test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any previous history of metabolic disease, liver disease/ diabetes
  • History of previous injuries to the cervical spine including radiculopathies and myelopathies as well as spinal stenosis and/or spinal disc herniation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Upper Limb Neurodynamics Group
Upper limb Neuro-dynamics (Slider/Tensioner Technique) along with Task Oriented Training
The experimental group will receive neuro-dynamic mobilization techniques along with task oriented training. Slider versus tensioner technique will be applied according to each patient's need. Session time will be 25-30 minutes. Four series of 10 tensioning movements at a rhythm of ∼6s per cycle and 1 min rest between each series will be performed. After each cycle of 10 repetitions, the position will hold for 10s.
Active Comparator: Upper Limb Conventional Therapy
Stretching, Strengthening exercises along with Task Oriented Training
Conventional treatment will include therapeutic ultrasound for 4 min, TENS for 10 min. Task oriented training will be designed according to patient's functional outcomes. Sessions will be given for 6 days a week, 25-30 minutes per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Numeric visual analogue scale (VAS) is a self-reported assessment that consists of a line with severe anchors ranging from "no pain" to "intense pain", which can be vertical or horizontal. Most frequently 10 cm long, this line serves as a continuum of pain severity. High test-retest reliability for the VAS has been recorded (ICC = 0.71-0.99). VAS is regarded as a powerful, therapeutically practical, accurate, and true measure of pain severity.
2 weeks
Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS) is an 8-item, region-specific questionnaire designed to evaluate diseases of the upper extremities caused by work. The UEFS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool created to assess how patients with a range of diseases are affected by upper extremity disorders in terms of function. UEFS demonstrate good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha > 0.83).
2 weeks
Jamar hand held dynamometer
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Jamar hand held dynamometer is widely used in clinical practice and research as a result of the American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) recommendation of it as the gold standard. The ICC for the Jamar dynamometer ranged from .996 to .998 (p< 0.05).
2 weeks
Nottingham sensory assessment Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Nottingham sensory assessment is a standardized scale for assessing sensory assessment in stroke patients. The NSA consists of 20 items and four subscales. The subscales included proprioception, stereognosis, two-point discrimination and tactile feeling. Each subscales item on tactile location on both sides of the body and bilateral simultaneous contact can be graded on the scale of 0-2. The Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency, values over 0.70 indicate Strong internal consistency.
2 weeks
Wolf Motor Function Test
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) quantifies upper extremity movement ability through timed single- or multiple-joint motions and functional tasks. The original version consisted of 21 item; the widely used version of the WMFT consists of 17 items Composed of 3 parts: Time, Functional ability &Strength. It Includes 15 function-based tasks and 2 strength based tasks Performance time is referred to as WMFT-TIME. Functional ability is referred to as WMFT-FAS. Items 1-6 involve timed functional tasks, items 7-14 are measures of strength, and the remaining 9 items consist of analyzing movement quality when completing various tasks. The WMFT is an instrument with high inter rater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and adequate stability.
2 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Goniometer is a method for measuring joint range of motion (ROM) that is widely accepted. It uses accurate and reliable measurement tools, especially the universal goniometer. For goniometry, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC- 3, k) of 0.94 showed excellent intra-ratter reliability.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abrish Habib Abbasi, MS-NMPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Umaira Sattar

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pronator Teres Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Upper limb Neuro-dynamics (Slider/ Tensioner Technique)

Subscribe