- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06011161
A Pilot of the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)
The Brief Relationship Checkup: A 3-Session Program to Support Veteran Relationships
The goal of this pilot trial is to study the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC) program for Veterans with a combination of mental health and relationship concerns.
BRC has been studied in Air Force primary care, but has never been tested in the Department of Veterans Affairs. To prepare for a larger study of BRC, the investigators asked the following questions:
- Can the research team deliver BRC to Veterans with mental health concerns? ("Feasibility")
- What is the best way to measure BRC's impact? ("Pilot Outcomes")
- Does BRC fit the needs of Veterans, and if not, what changes would fit participants' needs? ("Refinement")
Participants completed an initial interview, attended the BRC program, and completed a follow-up interview.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PURPOSE: Relationship distress is a common problem for Veterans with mental health concerns. Relationship treatments like couple therapy are effective, but studies in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) find that they are infrequently used and have high dropout rates. One possible solution is for VA to offer Relationship Checkups, a short program that helps couples commit to concrete steps to improve their relationship. A brief version of the program designed for Air Force primary care -- called the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC) for the purpose of the study -- may be an especially good fit for VA primary care or outpatient mental health teams.
RESEARCH PLAN: This study is a single-arm pilot trial of BRC in 20 couples. that are in distressed committed relationship where at least one partner is a Veteran who screens positive on a primary care mental health screen for common suicide risk factors including suicide ideation, depression, PTSD, or alcohol misuse (the "Identified Patient"). Participants provided initial ratings of outcomes in separate baseline sessions, completed BRC, and then completed separate post-treatment interviews and questionnaires.
SPECIFIC AIMS:
AIM 1: Evaluate feasibility of conducting a BRC trial in Veterans with mental health concerns. This includes recruitment rate, completion rate, and provider adherence to protocol.
AIM 2: Pilot outcomes that can be used to evaluate pre-post change in future studies of BRC. This includes relationship functioning, suicide risk factors, and treatment utilization.
AIM 3: Inform continued refinement of BRC to be suitable to the needs of Veterans and their partners. This includes examining current acceptability and using open-ended interviews.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Canandaigua, New York, United States, 14424
- Finger Lakes Healthcare System (Canandaigua)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- BOTH PARTNERS must be age 18 or over
- BOTH PARTNERS must demonstrate sufficient knowledge of English and cognitive capacity to understand the study through comprehension of consent questions
- BOTH PARTNERS must self-identify as "in a committed relationship" with their partner for at least 6-months.
- AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must report at least mild relationship distress on a satisfaction screen.
- AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must have Veteran status
- THE VETERAN PARTNER must screen positive on at least on a VA Primary Care Mental Health Screen (i.e., Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ)-2 for Depression, PHQ Item 9 for Suicide Risk; Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption Questions for At-Risk Drinking; or Primary Care-PTSD-5 for Potential PTSD)
Exclusion Criteria:
- EITHER PARTNER reports that they are engaged in ongoing couple or family therapy.
- EITHER PARTNER reports severe intimate partner violence in the last year.
- EITHER PARTNER reports experiencing suicidal intent or suicidal attempts in the last month.
- EITHER PARTNER experiences current psychosis.
- EITHER PARTNER experiences current mania.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Brief Relationship Checkup
Couples in the experimental condition will participate in three joint sessions of the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC; Cordova 2014; Cigrang et al., 2016).
This program has been tested in Air Force Primary Care but we do not know if veterans with mental health concerns will be able to attend it (feasibility), complete it safely (tolerability), and enjoy it (acceptability).
|
The investigators are using the three 30-minute session protocol developed for Air Force Primary Care (Cigrang et al., 2016).
Although it is simply referred to as the "Marriage Checkup" in that manuscript, the investigators use the name BRC to distinguish it from many other versions of Dr. James Cordova's Marriage Checkup (Cordova, 2014) adapted for different settings.
Sessions in this version are briefer than other versions (30 mins vs. 60-90 mins) and this trial does not have any eligibility restrictions based on marital status.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relationship Functioning
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI).
The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed."
The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies.
|
Pre-treatment
|
|
Relationship Functioning
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI).
The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed."
The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 27 with higher scores representing greater number and frequency of depression symptoms and scores of 10 or higher representing moderate depression.
|
Pre-treatment
|
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 27 with higher scores representing greater number and frequency of depression symptoms and scores of 10 or higher representing moderate depression.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
|
Perceived Burdensomeness
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Perceived burdensomeness will be measured with the burden-specific subscale of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 42 with higher scores representing a stronger belief that one is a burden on others.
Scores of 12 or higher predict a higher risk for developing suicidal ideation.
|
Pre-treatment
|
|
Perceived Burdensomeness
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Perceived burdensomeness will be measured with the burden-specific subscale of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 42 with higher scores representing a stronger belief that one is a burden on others.
Scores of 12 or higher predict a higher risk for developing suicidal ideation.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
|
Thwarted Belongingness
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Thwarted belongingness will be measured with the belonging-specific subscale of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 63 with higher scores representing a stronger feeling of loneliness and isolation.
Scores of 36 or higher predict a higher risk for developing suicidal ideation.
|
Pre-treatment
|
|
Thwarted Belongingness
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Thwarted belongingness will be measured with the belonging-specific subscale of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ).
This self-report scale has a minimum of 9 and a maximum of 63 with higher scores representing a stronger feeling of loneliness and isolation.
Scores of 36 or higher predict a higher risk for developing suicidal ideation.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
|
Suicide Ideation Severity
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Suicide ideation over the study will be monitored using the "Last Month" version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS).
This semi-structured interview has interviewers rate suicide ideation on a scale of 0 to 5, with scores of 3-5 placing individuals at high risk for attempt.
VA hospitals use the C-SSRS across all clinics.
|
Pre-treatment
|
|
Suicide Ideation Severity
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Suicide ideation over the study will be monitored using the "Last Month" version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS).
This semi-structured interview has interviewers rate suicide ideation on a scale of 0 to 5, with scores of 3-5 placing individuals at high risk for attempt.
VA hospitals use the C-SSRS across all clinics.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
|
Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Time Frame: Pre-treatment
|
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/validating. The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80, with higher scores indicating greater sense of validation/understanding from one's partner. |
Pre-treatment
|
|
Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/validating. The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80, with higher scores indicating greater sense of validation/understanding (i.e., greater emotional intimacy). |
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
|
Treatment Acceptability
Time Frame: After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Treatment acceptability was assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ, Larsen et al., 1979).
Scores range from 1-4 with scores greater than 3 representing satisfaction with the treatment.
|
After Completing the BRC Program (1-3months after pre-treatment)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Mental Health and Family Contacts
Time Frame: 90 day period before pre-treatment session
|
Treatment engagement in mental health services will be assessed through a review of the electronic medical record.
Staff will review appointments (e.g., individual, group, assessments) with a specific focus on general mental health services and couple/family support services (including Caregiver Support program and Intimate Partner Violence Assistance Program).
|
90 day period before pre-treatment session
|
|
Number of Mental Health and Family Contacts
Time Frame: 90 day period after final treatment session (earliest window 1-4mo after pre-treatment session and latest window 3-6mo)
|
Treatment engagement in mental health services will be assessed through a review of the electronic medical record.
Staff will review appointments (e.g., individual, group, assessments) with a specific focus on general mental health services and couple/family support services (including Caregiver Support program and Intimate Partner Violence Assistance Program).
|
90 day period after final treatment session (earliest window 1-4mo after pre-treatment session and latest window 3-6mo)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1469686
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
We will create deidentified datasets containing only variables used in a publication. This will be limited to the quantitative variables underlying publication to minimize likelihood of reidentification.
Deidentified datasets will be stored in repositories if required for publication. Otherwise, they will be available on request to individual researchers with appropriate credentials.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must demonstrate they are accessing the data for validation of results or other scientific/public purposes (e.g., replication of findings, incorporation of findings in meta-analyses).
Data sets will not be shared prior to the facility Privacy Officer approval of the access request and deidentification steps.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Relationship Distress
-
University of AarhusUniversity of Miami; TrygFonden, DenmarkCompletedFamily Relationship | Marital Conflict | Relationship DistressDenmark
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentActive, not recruitingRelationship DistressUnited States
-
OurRelationshipNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingRelationship Distress | Relationship ConflictUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingMental Health | Relationship DistressUnited States
-
Yanfei JinNot yet recruitingCancer | Sexual Dysfunction, Psychological | Relationship Distress
-
Beykoz UniversityUskudar University; Istanbul Nisantasi UniversityRecruitingDepressive Disorder | Anxiety Disorders | Emotion Regulation | Attachment | Relationship DistressTurkey
-
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement...Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesRecruitingAlcohol Use | Suicide Risk | Emotion Regulation | Relationship Distress | Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) | Relationship Conflict | Interpersonal Emotion RegulationUnited States
-
University of KansasEnrolling by invitationParent-Child Relations | Parenting | Relationship, Marital | Fathers | Relationship, Family | Relationships, Father-ChildUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
University of MiamiChildren's Bureau - Administration for Children and FamiliesCompletedRomantic RelationshipUnited States
Clinical Trials on Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingMental Health | Relationship DistressUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompletedAging | Psychiatric DisorderFrance
-
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of MedicineUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana; University Maribor; University Psychiatric...RecruitingNon-Suicidal Self Injury | Self-harm | Personality Disorder, Borderline | Difference, Individual | Epigenetic Disorder | Change; MentalSlovenia