- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06025448
Is MIO-RSA Noninferior to BIO-RSA When it Comes to Mechanical Implant Stability? (CARS-2)
From Cuff Arthropathy to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - a Multicentre Randomized Control Trial (CARS 2: Is MIO-RSA Noninferior to BIO-RSA When it Comes to Mechanical Implant Stability Measured With CT-based Motion Analysis (CTMA)?).
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Lateralization of reverse shoulder arthroplasties may reduce the risk for complications such as limited range of motion (ROM), and scapular notching, where the lower part of the scapular neck becomes eroded due to impingement against the humeral component. There's several ways to lateralize the glenoid component, a bone transplant placed underneath the glenoid component (Bony Increased Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty: BIO-RSA) has been used for some time. Recently glenoid components with metallic lateralization of the joint centre (Metal-Increased Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty: MIO-RSA) have been introduced, but there is not much comparative literature on metal vs. bony lateralization.
Patients with osteoarthritis and medialization of the glenoid articular surface, who willing to participate in a study will be randomized to receive either MIO-RSA or a BIO-RSA. CT-based motion analysis (CTMA) will be used to measure the 3-dimensional migration pattern of the glenoid components to assess the stability of the prostheses up to two years after implantation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Christian Owesen, PhD
- Phone Number: +4790515843
- Email: cow@lds.no
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hanne Fuglø, MPTh
- Phone Number: +4790524172
- Email: hanne.fuglo@lds.no
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0456
- Recruiting
- Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
-
Contact:
- Hanne Fuglø, MSc
- Phone Number: 90524172
- Email: hanne.fuglo@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Christian Owesen, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible for primary RSA due to OA, massive RC tear, failed RC repair or post-instability osteoarthritis
- massive glenoid medialization
- Able to read or write Norwegian
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe osteoporosis
- Osteonecrosis of the humeral head
- Dementia
- Poor deltoid function
- Revision surgery
- ASA IV
- Suspected chronic infection
- Acute fracture
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: BIO-RSA
|
Patients will have a reversed shoulder arthroplasty with lateralization of the joint centre using bony lateralization (BIO-RSA).
|
|
Experimental: MIO-RSA
|
Patients will have a reversed shoulder arthroplasty with lateralization of the joint centre using metallic lateralization (MIO-RSA).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Migration of glenoid component from baseline until 24 months
Time Frame: At baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. 24 months will be the primary outcome.
|
CT-based motion analysis (CTMA) will be used to measure the 3-dimensional migration pattern of the glenoid components to assess the stability of the prostheses up to two years after implantation. The motion analysis includes measurement of translation along three orthogonal axes and rotations around two orthogonal axes. CTMA is a marker-free motion analysis, and the images are obtained on a standard CT-machine. Analysis and computation of motion data are performed using proprietary software at Sectra AB (collaborating partner) CTMA is a relative new method to measure implant migration. The precision of the measurements is 0.08-0.15 mm for translation and 0.23-0.54º for rotation, therefore, CTMA is capable of measuring very small movements of the implant relative to the surrounding bone. |
At baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. 24 months will be the primary outcome.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in WOOS Index
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index is a patient-reported, disease-specific questionnaire for the measurement of the quality-of-life in patients with osteoarthritis. There are 19 questions divided into four domains: Physical symptoms, sports and work, lifestyle and emotions. Each question is answered on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100. The overall score ranges from 0 to 1900, with 1900 being the worst. For ease of interpretation, the scores are often converted to a percentage of the maximum score. |
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Change in Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
The CMS is a multi-item functional scale assessing pain, ADL, ROM and strength of the affected shoulder. Its score ranges from 0 to 100 points, representing worst and best shoulder function, respectively. The test is divided into subjective and objective components. Two subjective: pain and activities of daily living (ADL) and two objective: range of motion (ROM) and strength. The subjective components can receive up to 35 points and the objective 65. Pain and ADL are answered by the patient; ROM and strength require a physical evaluation and are answered by the orthopaedic surgeon or the physiotherapist. |
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Change in EuroQol-5
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
he widely used EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D-5L) will be used to measure health-related quality of life. The EQ5D-5L consists of two parts: A descriptive system (Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and the EQ-VAS that record patients self-rated health on a visual analog scale that range from 0 -100, higher levels indicate better self-rated health. The descriptive system can be converted to a single summary index number where lower levels indicate poorer health related quality of life. |
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Change in range of motion
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
The patient's active and passive range of motion (ROM) in the affected shoulder will be measured by an experienced physiotherapist with a long-legged goniometer.
The directions measured will be flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation, measured in degrees and/or physical landmarks.
|
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Change in Subjective Shoulder Value
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
The SSV score is defined as the subjective evaluation by the patient of shoulder function, expressed as a percentage of a normal shoulder.
This score ranges from 0 to 100%.
|
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Anchor Question 1
Time Frame: Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
This anchor question is asked to help determine Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). "Considering all daily activities that involves your operated shoulder, your level of pain and degree of function, how satisfied are you with the condition of your shoulder is right now?" Alternatives: Satisfied/somewhat satisfied/Neither satisfied or unsatisfied/somewhat unsatisfied/Unsatisfied |
Before randomization, 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.
|
|
Anchor Question 2
Time Frame: 3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
|
This anchor question is asked to help determine Minimal Important Difference (MID) and Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB). "Think of all the ways your operated shoulder has affected you the last week. Since your surgery, has there been any change in the condition of your shoulder that you would consider important or meaningful to you?" Alternatives: Much better/moderately better/a bit better/no change/a bit worse/moderately worse/Much worse |
3, 12 and 24 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sigbjørn Dimmen, Prof., University of Oslo
- Principal Investigator: Kjersti Kaul Jenssen, PhD, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
- Study Director: Christian Owesen, PhD, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CARS-2
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty Complications
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkMedical College of WisconsinRecruitingComplications; Arthroplasty | Complications; Arthroplasty, MechanicalUnited States
-
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Restor3DCompletedComplications; ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré AunisCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Stryker OrthopaedicsCompleted
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsFrance
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedArthroplasty Complications
-
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation...University of East Anglia; Dynamic Metrics LtdCompletedArthroplasty ComplicationsUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on BIO-RSA
-
Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalHaukeland University Hospital; Sykehuset Telemark; University Hospital, AkershusRecruitingShoulder Osteoarthritis | Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderNorway
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedAvascular Necrosis | Inflammatory Arthritis | Osteoarthritis, Hip | Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of HipFrance, Germany, Austria, Spain
-
State University of New York - Upstate Medical...WithdrawnAssess Motion in Flexion/Extension and Lateral Bending of the Lumbar Vertebrae in Vivo Following Motion Sparing Surgery Using Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA.)United States
-
Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Arthropathy | Aseptic LooseningItaly
-
Stryker Trauma and ExtremitiesTerminatedShoulder ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenTerminatedAutism Spectrum DisorderBelgium
-
Emory UniversityRecruitingRotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy | Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty | Advanced Glenohumeral OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalUnknownDistal Femur FracturesUnited States
-
University Hospital, CaenUnknown
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyArthritis FoundationCompleted