A Human Versus Machine Comparison Study (HuVeM)

September 15, 2023 updated by: East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust

A Step Towards Fully Automated Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head & Neck Cancer: A Human Versus Machine Comparison Study

The study aims to retrospectively, and anonymously analyse the data of patients treated over a period of 12 months. These are the patients whose radiotherapy plan were needed to be reviewed in the weekly on-treatment head and neck multi-professional radiotherapy meeting during the course of their radiation.

Collected clinical data will be included in the retrospective analysis, comparing the clinical decision (gold standard of care), against the predictive capability of intelligence software

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a single centre, non-interventional study comparing "machine" against clinician's standard of care approach. The utilisation of intelligence software is for research purposes only and does not permit active changes to patients' clinical management. Any software related analyses will be done after patients have completed radiation treatment.

All consented patients who were discussed in the head and neck CBCT meeting and deemed to require new masks / recontouring / replanning - Cohort A will be analysed on completion of radiotherapy. These patients typically are ones with nodal disease of >3cm at presentation, and whose weight change is notable 5 - 10% of baseline in the first 2 weeks of their treatment. There have been 28 patients in 12 months previously.

Other patients discussed in the head and neck CBCT meeting on completion of radiation - Cohort B, whose radiotherapy was not deemed to require total replan but were clinically deemed 'marginal' will be included. These patients tend to be ones with weight loss measuring close to 1.29cm lateral separation or between the skin surface and the head shell.

The radiotherapy replan volumes CTVs of Cohort A patients will retrospectively compared to the CTVs produced by the intelligence software. The time using the software to produce dynamic CTVs will be compared with the time needed for the clinicians to create new CTV for the radiotherapy replan, which will be recorded prospectively.

The CBCTs of both Cohorts A & B will be analysed using the intelligence software to determine the adequacy of PTV coverage. This is to be compared with the departmental quality assurance/audit of PTV margins.

The software will also be used to calculate various aspects of the radiotherapy plans, including the cumulative dose distribution over the period of dynamic anatomical change Cohorts A & B.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Minimum of 12 patients who required total radiotherapy replan (Cohort A) Minimum of 28 patients who were reviewed in the multi-professional meeting but did not require full replan (Cohort B) Minimum of 40 patients in total (Cohorts A&B).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • i. Head and neck cancer patients who require new mask for radiotherapy replanning will be included (Cohort A). These patients typically are ones with rapid shrinkage of the nodal disease, or whose weight change is notable (5 - 10% of baseline) in the first 2 weeks of radiotherapy ii. Patients on close observation of the head and neck multi-professional team but whose radiotherapy did no undergo total replan treatment will be included (Cohort B)

Exclusion Criteria:

i. Patients whose primary malignancy is not of head and neck origin ii. Patients who specifically opt against their information be used anonymously iii. Head and neck cancer patients whose radiotherapy plans did not require review in the head and neck multi-professional radiotherapy meeting iv. Patients under the age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
A
Minimum of 12 patients who required total radiotherapy replan
B
Minimum of 28 patients who were reviewed in the multi-professional meeting but did not require full replan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interobserver variability studies (IOV) between manually contoured CTVs and software-generated deformed CTVs
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by volume differences
1 year
Interobserver variability studies (IOV) between manually contoured CTVs and software-generated deformed CTVs - Sorensen-DICE Coefficient
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of ratio of overlap
1 year
Interobserver variability studies (IOV) between manually contoured CTVs and software-generated deformed CTVs - Discordance Index
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of over contouring
1 year
Interobserver variability studies (IOV) between manually contoured CTVs and software-generated deformed CTVs - Geographical miss index
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of under contouring
1 year
Interobserver variability studies (IOV) between manually contoured CTVs and software-generated deformed CTVs - Hausdorff distance
Time Frame: 1 year
Measurement of distance between 2 volumes
1 year
PTV margins compared against the departmental standards
Time Frame: 1 year
Proportion of clinical tumour volume covered by different radiotherapy set up margins 3, 4 and 5mm
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Potential time saved recontouring with software and the associated cost of re-planning adaptive radiotherapy
Time Frame: 1 year
Difference between time spent on re- contouring and time spent on editing software deformed CTVs
1 year
Evaluation of clinical decision on total radiotherapy re-plan
Time Frame: 1 year
Measured by retrospective assessment of dose accumulation of the CTVs
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 27, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RD2021-57

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Subscribe