Face It Evaluation

September 25, 2023 updated by: Tom McBride, The Behavioural Insights Team

This project is a pilot evaluation randomised controlled trial of Face It, a school-based intervention designed and implemented by Khulisa. Face It is specifically designed for young people at risk of offending, exploitation and school exclusion. The programme builds self-awareness and encourages pupils to reflect on the root causes and triggers of their disruptive or challenging behaviour. Khulisa believes that early intervention breaks the school to prison pipeline, which is exacerbated by exclusion, enabling young people to choose a safe and crime-free future. The intervention is delivered over 6 weeks, including an intensive 5-day programme of activities, and pre-programme and post-programme group and 1:1 sessions. Each programme is tailored to participants' needs and uses art, storytelling, 1:1 and group experiential techniques, delivered by trained dramatherapists.

The randomised controlled trial will test the programme's feasibility, acceptability, evaluability, mechanisms and outcomes, to determine whether the trial should proceed to a full-scale efficacy trial through quantitative and qualitative data collection.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Face It is a schools-based intervention, developed by Khulisa. It is an intensive therapeutic group programme for young people, focused on developing social and emotional skills and designed to explore the root causes of emotional distress. It combines creative techniques like storytelling, art, debating, and role-play, informed by neuroscience.

There is strong evidence that social and emotional skills are important for the positive development of children and young people, and contribute to a range of important long-term educational, economic, health, social and criminal justice outcomes. There is also good evidence that well-designed school-based social and emotional programmes can be effective, that they are being successfully implemented in UK schools, and can have positive impact on students' social and emotional competencies and educational outcomes.

The Face It intervention is in its early stages in terms of evidence and evaluation, and there is not yet a robust randomised control trial demonstrating that it is effective at improving outcomes for children and young people. However, Face It indicates early promise as an intervention to improve social and emotional skills. The intervention has demonstrated that it can recruit and retain participants, and qualitative work indicates that the programme is well-regarded by participants. An internal evaluation of the programme conducted by Nesta indicated that Khulisa's theory of change highlights relevant outcomes, and both quantitative and qualitative insights suggested largely positive changes in the outcomes examined. Khulisa is also currently conducting a quasi-experimental study which is scheduled to be completed in the Autumn 2023. These studies collectively show that the intervention shows promise.

However, the lack of a randomised comparison group in the existing evaluations limits the conclusions that can be made about impact on outcomes for children and young people. Before any future full-scale randomised control trial, it is important that a small-scale pilot trial is conducted in advance to support and inform this work - to test and improve evaluation procedures such as randomisation and data collection, and to generate useful information around sample size determination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students in years 9-10
  • Students who speak functional English
  • Students who are willing to take part in the programme
  • Students who have experienced relational or social adversity
  • Students who have disengaged from education

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who are permanently excluded or not in full-time mainstream education
  • Students with SEND who receive 1 to 1 support
  • Students with active, severe and unaddressed safeguarding or mental health risk(s)
  • Students who are actively receiving mental health support

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Face It programme, including pre-programme one-to-one and group sessions, 5-day intensive programme, and post-programme one-to-one and group sessions
School-based intervention delivered over 6 weeks, including an intensive 5-day programme of activities, and pre-programme and post-programme group and 1:1 sessions. Each programme is tailored to participants' needs and uses art, storytelling, 1:1 and group experiential techniques, delivered by trained dramatherapists.
Active Comparator: Control
Services as usual
Services as usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioural difficulties
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - young person self-report

The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.

While the total difficulties score is the primary outcome, we will also examine the total difficulties score when broken down into the externalising score (the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales), and the internalising score (the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales).

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioural difficulties
Time Frame: Within 3 months after the end of the intervention

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - young person self-report

The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.

While the total difficulties score is the primary outcome, we will also examine the total difficulties score when broken down into the externalising score (the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales), and the internalising score (the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales).

Within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Behavioural difficulties
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent report

The overall (five-subscale) SDQ score ranges from 0 to 50, with a higher score indicating abnormal behaviours. The Total Difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40. The externalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales. The internalising score ranges from 0 to 20 and is the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales. Higher scores indicate abnormal behaviours.

While the total difficulties score is the primary outcome, we will also examine the total difficulties score when broken down into the externalising score (the sum of the conduct and hyperactivity scales), and the internalising score (the sum of the emotional and peer problems scales).

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Offending
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

The Self-Report Delinquency Scale - young person self-report

Variety of delinquency score:

Sum the number of items the respondent answers 'yes' to:

  • Yes = 1
  • No = 0 Produces a score that ranges from 0-19, where a higher score indicates a higher variety of delinquency.

Volume of delinquency score:

Summing the point values when respondents report a number of times. Point values are assigned as follows:

  • Once = 1
  • Twice = 2
  • 3 times = 3
  • 4 times = 4
  • 5 times = 5
  • Between 6 and 10 times = 6
  • More than 10 times = 11 Produces a score that ranges from 0 to 11 for each delinquent behaviour, where a higher score indicates a higher volume of delinquency
Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Victimisation
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

The Problem Behaviour Frequency Scale (Overt victimisation and relational victimisation subscales)

Produces a score ranging from 6-36 achieved by summing scores of the two subscales, where a higher score indicates a higher frequency of problem behaviours

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Resilience
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

The Children's Hope Scale

Produces a score ranging from 6-36 where a higher score indicates a higher level of hope.

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Emotional Regulation
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

The Emotional Regulation Questionnaire

Produces a score ranging from 10-50, where the higher the score, the greater the use of emotion regulation strategies; lower scores represent less frequent use of such strategies

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Social and emotional wellbeing
Time Frame: Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention

The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS)

Scores range from 7 to 35 and higher scores indicate higher positive mental wellbeing

Within 1 month after the end of the intervention and within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Average school attendance
Time Frame: Within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Average pupil attendance in the previous three months, recorded as a percentage
Within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Number of school exclusions
Time Frame: Within 3 months after the end of the intervention
Number of exclusions over the previous three months
Within 3 months after the end of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After the project has been completed, data will be shared with YEF and stored in the YEF archives.

Approved researchers may apply to access YEF data via the ONS secure research service. This will be accessed via their own project space created in ONS secure research environment by the ONS. They may apply to the DfE and MoJ to access the linked NPD-PNC data, and if successful it will be made available here to combine with the YEF evaluation data, using the PMRs. Researchers will only be able to access pseudonymised data. All results will be published in a deidentified form.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be shared with YEF within 6 months after submission of the final report to YEF.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who are approved by the YEF and accredited to work with ONS data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Adjustment

Clinical Trials on Face It

Subscribe