Effect of a Six-week Integrated Attention Training Program on the Cognitive Functions of Older Adults With Co-occurring Anxiety Symptoms and Subjective Cognitive Complaints

March 2, 2026 updated by: Hong Kong Baptist University

The goal of this single-blind randomized control trial is to compare a 6-week Integrated Attention Training Program (IATP) and health education in older people with co-occurrence of anxiety symptoms and subjective cognitive decline (SCC).

The study aims to answer if a 6-week Integrated Attention Training Program (IATP) will improve cognitive, anxiety, and level of pro-inflammatory biomarkers in this high-risk group.

Older adults with co-occurring anxiety and SCC will be recruited to participate in a 6-week single-blind randomized controlled trial. IATP group (Intervention group) will undergo attention and functional training. Control group will receive health education.

Investigators will compare the IATP with health education to see if cognitive function, anxiety symptoms, and level of pro-inflammatory biomarkers in comparison to health education will improved after intervention and over 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a 2-armed randomized control trial. For both groups, participants will attend a 45-minute training twice a week for consecutive 6 weeks in a group of 6 people. IATP group (I) will begin with 5 minutes of warm up to give instructions, followed by 5 minutes of breathing exercises, 5 minutes of body scanning, 10 minutes of dual-task training, 15 minutes of functional training, and 5 minutes of performance appraisal under guidance of an intervention instructor. Control group (C) will receive 12 sessions of health education on managing chronic diseases or conditions commonly found in old age during the intervention period.

Assessments will take place at baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1) and after 24-week (T2).

Measurement will include a battery of cognitive assessments, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), and a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, educational level, and socioeconomic status), physical and mental health statuses, and lifestyle patterns (smoking, drinking, and leisure activities in the past one month). In addition, a 15ml blood sample will be collected from each consenting participant by a phlebotomist for an inflammatory assay analysis at T0. Follow-up assessments and blood collections will be arranged at 6th (T1) and 24th (T2) week.

Linear mixed effects models will analyze the changes on anxiety and cognitive performance from baseline to endpoints. All the analyses will be based on Intention-to-treat principle.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Ada WT FUNG

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Older adults aged 60 to 90 years;
  2. No Major Neurocognitive Disorders
  3. Presence of anxiety symptoms
  4. Presence of Subjective Cognitive Complaints

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical dementia
  2. History of major depression
  3. Presence of major neurological deficit
  4. Presence of severe visual impairment; or
  5. Currently on any psychotropic or other medications known to affect cognition; or
  6. Participation in other cognitive trainings or interventions 6 months prior to this study or during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: IATP
Integrated Attention Training Program (IATP) specifically aims at training attentional control, which involves the coordination of complex behaviours, such as planning, reasoning, selection and information inhibition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attention - Digit Span Forward Task
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Participants are asked to repeat a series of digits immediately after presentation, in ascending order starting from 3 and up to 8 digits. Analysis of scoring is based on the span length achieved.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Attention - Chinese Trail Making Test - Part A (CTMT-A)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
The participant will need to connect between Arabic and Chinese numbers in sequential order. The completion time (in second) and the numbers of errors made during the test are recorded
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Executive function - Category Verbal Fluency Test (CVFT)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
It is test of semantic fluency and executive function. Participants were asked to generate as many exemplars as possible for each of the three semantic categories, namely animals, fruits, and vegetables, in 60 seconds. Their responses were recorded in serial order. Analysis of scoring is based on the total number of words that the participant is able to produce across all three categories.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Executive function - Digit Span Backwards Task
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Participants will be asked to repeat a series of digits immediately after presentation, in reverse order starting from 2 and up to 8 digits. Analysis of scoring is based on the span length achieved.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Executive function - Chinese Trail Making Test - Part B (CTMT-B)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
The participant will need to connect and alternate between Arabic and Chinese numbers. The completion time (in second) and the numbers of errors made during the test are recorded.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) - each item will be scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where 17 or less indicates a mild severity, 18-24 indicates a mild to moderate severity and 25-30 a moderate to severe severity.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Level of inflammation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Levels of IL-1β
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Level of inflammation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Levels of IL-6
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Level of inflammation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Levels of TNF-α
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Level of inflammation
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
Levels of CRP
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional performance - Chinese version of Disability of Assessment in dementia (CDAD)
Time Frame: 6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline
It is subdivided into basic activities of daily living (BADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). It evaluates the ability of an individual to initiate, plan and execute everyday activities. The overall score of DAD ranges from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better functioning.
6 weeks after baseline and 6 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ada WT FUNG, PhD, Hong Kong Baptist University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HMRF 10211426

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Dissimination through conference presentation and publications

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Integrated Attention Training Program

Subscribe