Health Education Approach to Lung Screening (HEALS)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Health Education Approach to Lung Screening (HEALS)

Evaluate the impact of the patient navigation program on the proportion of patients who complete lung cancer screening (LCS), defined as undergoing a low dose computed tomography (LDCT)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a single-arm study of a patient navigation intervention to increase access to lung cancer screening (LCS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

675

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Massey IIT Research Operations
  • Phone Number: 804-628-6430
  • Email: masseyepd@vcu.edu

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Carrboro, North Carolina, United States, 27510
        • Recruiting
        • University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
        • Contact:
          • Alison Brenner, MD
          • Phone Number: (919) 966-2865
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alison Brenner, MD
        • Contact:
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:
          • Marvella Ford, MD
          • Phone Number: 843-876-2428
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marvella Ford, MD
        • Contact:
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Recruiting
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vanessa Sheppard, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets current USPSTF guidelines for lung cancer screening (LCS)
  • 20 pack-year smoking history Note: A pack-year is a way of calculating how much a person has smoked in their lifetime.

One pack-year is the equivalent of smoking an average of 20 cigarettes-1 pack-per day for a year.

  • Currently smokes or has quit smoking within the past 15 years
  • Identifies as Black or African-American Note: Both Hispanic/Latino and Non-Hispanic/Latino patients are eligible as long as they also identify as Black or African-American (eg, Afro-Latino).
  • Willing to complete all navigation-related study activities
  • Able to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient who meets any of the following exclusion criteria is ineligible to participate in the study:

  • Known history of cancer (except squamous cell skin cancer), or coughing up blood in the past 5 years, as reported by the individual
  • Has undergone a previous lung cancer screening
  • Inability to speak English
  • Medical, psychological, or social condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the patient's risk or limit the patient's adherence with study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient Navigation
Centralized patient navigators will be trained to help patients navigate the clinical, logistical, and financial aspects of LCS. Navigators employ case management approaches based on social work principles. The experience of patient navigation will be tailored to the individual participant

Navigation will address the following 4 domains of barriers to screening:

  • Individual
  • Organizational
  • Economic
  • Sociocultural At the first visit, navigators will assess the participant's barriers in each of these domains. Any follow-up visits, if necessary, will be used to help the participant overcome these barriers to screening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of study patients who complete lung cancer screening (LCS) through the patient navigation process
Time Frame: 2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Evaluate the impact of the patient navigation program on the number of patients who complete lung cancer screening (LCS), defined as undergoing a low dose computed tomography (LDCT).
2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the feasibility and acceptability of the patient navigation program
Time Frame: Day 1
Determine the number of participants that are satisfied with the navigation program by utilizing Was It Worth It instrument; that consists of 8 items that are are answered "yes", "no" or "uncertain".
Day 1
Assess the impact of the patient navigation program on patient health-related quality of life at baseline.
Time Frame: Day 1
Utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v1.2 Global Health Scale (10 items) scores before and after navigation intervention. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v1.2 Global Health Scale (10 items), measures assess physical, mental, and social health where 5=Never, 4=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 2=Often, and 1=Always. Higher scores indicate better health.
Day 1
Assess the impact of the patient navigation program on patient financial distress
Time Frame: Day 1
Determine the number of participants that have financial distress at baseline utilizing Financial Distress measure scores at baseline. Study-specific financial distress measure (8 items) each item will need to be individually coded 1-5, with 1=completely disagree to 5=completely agree and 98 for Don't know and 99 for Not applicable.
Day 1
Assess the feasibility and acceptability of the patient navigation program
Time Frame: 2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Determine the number of participants that are satisfied with the navigation program by utilizing Was It Worth It instrument; that consists of 8 items that are are answered "yes", "no" or "uncertain" after the navigation program.
2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Assess the impact of the patient navigation program on patient health-related quality of life after navigation intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Utilizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v1.2 Global Health Scale (10 items) scores before and after navigation intervention. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v1.2 Global Health Scale (10 items), measures assess physical, mental, and social health, where 5=Never, 4=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 2=Often, and 1=Always. Higher scores indicate better health.
2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Assess the impact of the patient navigation program on patient financial distress
Time Frame: 2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant
Determine the number of participants that have lessening financial distress after the navigation program utilizing Financial Distress measure scores at baseline. Study-specific financial distress measure (8 items) each item will be individually coded 1-5, with 1=completely disagree to 5=completely agree and 98 for Don't know and 99 for Not applicable.
2 weeks to 10 months following day 1, varies by participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vanessa Sheppard, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Currently there is not a plan to share with other researchers not working on the protocol.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patient Navigation

Subscribe