The Effectiveness of Patient Navigation in Cancer Care

October 9, 2017 updated by: The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Rationale: Supportive care such as physical therapy, psycho-social education, and dietary advice is likely to have a positive effect on the recovery and quality of life of cancer patients. Currently, not all patients know how to access supportive care, which results in unmet supportive care needs. This study determines whether these unmet needs can be reduced or prevented by a patient navigation intervention that focuses on timely screening and systematic monitoring of patient's supportive care needs.

Objective: The primary objective is to determine the effect of patient navigation on health related quality of life. Secondary objectives are: 1) to determine the effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with, need for, and consumption of (supportive) cancer care; 2) to determine the effect of patient navigation on patients' self-management; 3) to explore how patient navigation affects the cost-effectiveness of cancer care.

Study design: Longitudinal randomised controlled trial with two study arms: a patient navigation intervention and care as usual.

Study population: Newly diagnosed lung, melanoma, urology, or gynecology patients of the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Intervention : Consultations with a specifically trained oncology nurse (i.e. patient navigator), who assesses patients' needs for supportive cancer care, provides information on supportive cancer care, and guides patients through the supportive cancer care system. Consultations with the patient navigator take place at the start, halfway through, and at the end of treatment.

Main study endpoints: The main endpoint of this study is health related quality of life, which is defined as an individual's perceived emotional, social, physical, and functional wellbeing over time. Health related quality of life is assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participants are expected to strongly benefit from consulting the patient navigator without being subjected to any severe risks. Consultations will be provided by highly qualified professionals, and result in benefits such as decreased severity of cancer-related psychosocial and physical distress. To minimise burden, face-to-face consultations will always be scheduled alongside other appointments of at the NKI-AVL. Furthermore, questionnaire completion takes no more than 30 minutes per data collection round, of which three are scheduled in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1066 CX
        • Dutch Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with lung, melanoma, urology or gynecology related cancer
  • Male or female
  • Treated at the Dutch Cancer Institute
  • Has not started treatment at the Dutch Cancer Institute
  • 18 years of age and over
  • Curative or palliative treatment
  • Able to understands and speak Dutch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not willing to sign the consent form
  • Not willing to meet with the patient navigator
  • Not willing to complete questionnaires at any point in time

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Care as usual
Experimental: Patient navigation
Consultations with a specifically trained oncology nurse (i.e. patient navigator), who assesses patients' needs for supportive cancer care, provides information on supportive cancer care, and guides patients through the supportive cancer care system. Consultations with the patient navigator take place at the start, halfway through, and at the end of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
EORTC QLQ-C30
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in need for supportive cancer care
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
Distress Thermometer
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
Satisfaction with (supportive) cancer care
Time Frame: Month 5
(Adapted version of) Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Care
Month 5
Change in consumption of supportive cancer care
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
(Adapted version of) Medical Consumption Questionnaire
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
Change in self-management
Time Frame: Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
Study specific questions on knowledge and self-efficacy
Baseline, month 1, month 3, month 5
Change in work productivity
Time Frame: Baseline and month 5
Study specific questions on work productivity
Baseline and month 5
Change in health status
Time Frame: Baseline and month 5
EQ-5D-5L
Baseline and month 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eveline Bleiker, PhD, The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N16NVG

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patient navigation

3
Subscribe