INvestigating DIGital Outcomes in the Community (INDIGO-Com)

October 17, 2023 updated by: Imperial College London

INDIGO Community Participant Led Electronic Completion of PROMs and PREMs for Patients Living With and Beyond Cancer in the Community

To explore the feasibility and best methodology for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have previously been treated for cancer and are living in the community.

The investigators are working with primary care research teams, and using an online electronic questionnaire. Although the study is entirely observational, the study offers some of the questions in a random order, so the investigators can explore the effect of changing the way in which questions are asked.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

INDIGO Community aims to both collect data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMS) and data on the impact of how to do this.

The focus is on adult patients living in the community who have previously been treated for cancer.

The study uses a range of quality of life questionnaires, and randomises the order in which some questions are asked, in order to explore the impact of how questions are asked on responses.

All patients with be offered the EuroQol 5 dimension, 5 level questionnaire (EQ5D-5L)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All adults living with a previous diagnosis of cancer in a defined geographical area (NW London in stage 1; nationally in stage 2)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone over the age of 16 who has been diagnosed (receiving treatment is not an inclusion criteria although the investigators expect as this is a long-term survivorship study all participants will have received treatment) for any type of cancer in the past (> 12 months) can participate.
  • Participants who self-identify as having previously (time unlimited) received a diagnosis of cancer, based on histological, radiological, or clinical grounds (primary and/or metastatic cancer). Current treatment is not a barrier to participation, but the emphasis is on patients who have completed treatment.

Participants need to be able to access the secure online platform, using a mobile device or computer.

  • Have capacity and be able to provide informed consent via the online platform.
  • To be able to understand, read and write English, with or without support from a trusted individual e.g., friends, family, carer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants recently diagnosed with cancer (less than 12 months ago).
  • Participants unable to access secure online platform.
  • Participants who do not have sufficiently good understanding of written English to complete the PROMs and are unable to be supported by a trusted individual to complete the questionnaire.
  • Participants lacking capacity and unable to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Linked to national data

Patients will be randomly assigned to be asked to link personal data with national cancer data.

The outcome measure will be the proportion of completed questionnaires

Linking to national data, early vs. late questions

Subset of cohort 1: Patients will be randomly assigned to be asked the question about data linkage at the beginning vs. end of the questionnaire

The outcome measure will be the proportion answering yes in each arm

Different PROM Completion rate

Patients will be randomised to two different PROM questionnaires

The outcome measure will be the completion rate of the two different questionnaires

Impact of additional PROMS on completion and satisfaction

Patients will be randomised to either a standard PROM or additional, symptom directed questionnaire

The outcome measure will be the satisfaction rate of patients in each arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion of study questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients completing the entire study questionnaire
12 months
Agreement to link to national cancer data
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients agreeing to link their data to national cancer data
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completion of PROMs questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients completing PROMS questionnaires
12 months
Satisfaction with questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient-reported satisfaction with questionnaires, expressed as average scores (on a scale of 1 - 10, where 10 is better) and proportion scoring 5 or over
12 months
Effectiveness of different communication channels for recruitment
Time Frame: 12 months
Enrolment rate via different recruitment channels (Primary Care Research Network, Social Media) expressed as the proportion of patient recruited via each channel
12 months
Correlation of each PROM score with quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
Correlation of each PROM score with the EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 levels (EQ5D-5L) quality of life measure
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The feasibility of developing a national longitudinal cohort
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess what proportion of participants agree to ongoing, long-term follow-up
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Williams, MBChB PhD FRCR, Imperial College Healthcare Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 000000 (MRDC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared, where patients give permission, with the national cancer registration service. Future researchers may then access the data via that route.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Subscribe