- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06110637
Effects of Running Shoe Sole Hardness on Vibration and Neuromuscular Fatigue During a Half-marathon Run on a Treadmill (FAT-VIB)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Only 4 studies have studied Soft-Tissue Vibrations (STV) with a distance not exceeding 10 km and without evaluating the potential influence of the shoe. Thus, the effects of shoe midsole hardness on Soft-Tissue Vibrations (STV) and neuromuscular fatigue at the end of an intense and/or long run remains unknown.
The purpose is to compare two shoes whose only midsole hardness differs during a half-marathon on Soft-Tissue Vibrations (STV), neuromuscular fatigue and running kinetics.
Maybe the shoe ensuring a better STV damping of the medial gastrocnemius muscle would reduce neuromuscular fatigue and improve comfort.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Étienne, France, 42055
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Endurance runners doing a long run of at least 20 km once a week.
- Affiliated or beneficiaries of a social security plan.
- Have freely given their written consent.
- Not participating in a competition during the study period.
- Shoe size 37 to 46
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any subject who has been injured in the 3 months preceding the protocol
- Any subject with chronic joint pathologies (e.g., repeated sprains, patellar or ligament problems) or cardiac pathologies.
- Any subject with chronic or central neurological pathologies
- Any subject participating at the same time in another medical interventional experiment
- Any subject who has taken corticosteroids within 3 months (inhalation, infiltration or history of prolonged corticosteroid therapy).
- Any subject deprived of liberty or under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice, family habilitation).
- Any subject declaring to have taken products prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hard shoes runners
Half-marathon runners with hard shoes preceded and followed by assessment of neuromuscular fatigue.
|
The "hard shoes" runners get on the treadmill for 21 km at a speed corresponding to 70 percent (%) of their the maximum aerobic speed (MAV) and are evaluated.
|
|
Active Comparator: Soft shoes runners
Half-marathon runners with soft shoes preceded and followed by assessment of neuromuscular fatigue.
|
The "soft shoes" runners get on the treadmill for 21 km at a speed corresponding to 70 percent (%) of their the maximum aerobic speed (MAV) and are evaluated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of the damping coefficient (in percent %).
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
The main evaluation criterion will be the relative variation (in percent %) of the damping coefficient (in /s) of the medial gastrocnemius muscle measured with an accelerometer, at the beginning (the first five minutes) and at the end (the last five minutes) of 21 km at a speed corresponding to 70% of the maximum aerobic speed (MAS) on a treadmill, carried out by experienced amateurs during two shoe conditions: soft and firm sole.
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Temporal evolution of vibrations measurements.
Time Frame: Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st
|
The relative variation (in percent %) of the damping coefficient (in /s) of the medial gastrocnemius muscle will be measured with an accelerometer every 3 km at a speed corresponding to 70% of the maximum aerobic speed (MAS) on a treadmill, carried out by confirmed amateurs during the two shoe conditions. For this outcome, it is not possible to use an unit of time, because the time of the measurements are define only by the distance covered by the subject. |
Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st
|
|
Evaluation of improved vibration damping on neuromuscular fatigue : isometric force
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
The relative change (in percent %) in the maximum isometric force (in Newton) of the ankle plantar flexors before and after the 21 km
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
|
Evaluation of improved vibration damping on neuromuscular fatigue : jerk amplitude.
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
The relative change (in percent %) in jerk amplitudes measured by electrically evoked force (in Newton) after isometric contraction of the plantar flexors of the ankle, before and after the 21 km.
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
|
Evaluation of improved vibration damping on neuromuscular fatigue : level of voluntary activation.
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
The relative change (percent %) in the maximum level of voluntary activation (percent %) measured in isometric mode of the plantar flexors of the ankle before and after the 21 km
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
|
Evaluation of improved vibration damping on neuromuscular fatigue : plantar flexors.
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
The relative change (in percent %) in the maximum isometric force (in Newton) of the plantar flexors of the toes before and after the 21 km.
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
|
Temporal evolution of the energy cost measurement
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
This will be the relative variation (in percent %) of the energy cost (in J/kg/m), measured continuously thanks to a portable gas exchange measurement system (ergo spirometer Metamax 3B®, Cortex Medical, Leipzig, Germany), at a speed corresponding to 70% of the maximum aerobic speed (MAS) on a treadmill, carried out by experienced amateurs during the two shoe conditions.
|
From the beginning to the end of the 21 km race.
|
|
Biomechanical parameters measurement : Ground reaction forces (Newton)
Time Frame: Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st.
|
Ground reaction forces (in Newton, measured by treadmill force platforms). For this outcome, it is not possible to use an unit of time, because the time of the measurements are define only by the distance covered by the subject. |
Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st.
|
|
Biomechanical parameters measurement : Spatio-temporal parameters (second)
Time Frame: Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st.
|
Spatio-temporal parameters: contact time (CT) and flight time (TV) For this outcome, it is not possible to use an unit of time, because the time of the measurements are define only by the distance covered by the subject. |
Kilometers : 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 15th, 18th, 21st.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: LEONARD FEASSON, MDPHD, CHU de Saint-Etienne
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21CH248
- 2022-A00219-34 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers
-
AstraZenecaCompletedHealthy Elderly Volunteers | Healthy Young VolunteersUnited States
-
Syndax PharmaceuticalsCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Volunteers | Normal Volunteers | Human VolunteersUnited States
-
Syndax PharmaceuticalsCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Volunteers | Normal Volunteers | Human VolunteersUnited States
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUnite de Nutrition Humaine UMR 1019- INRAE; Unite MetaGenoPolis INRAE; France...CompletedHealthy Volunteers | Frail VolunteersFrance
-
Newcastle UniversityCompletedGI Glycaemic Index Healthy Volunteers | GL Glycaemic Load Healthy VolunteersUnited Kingdom
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.CelerionCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersUnited States
-
Danone NutriciaCompletedHealthy Elderly | Healthy VolunteersChina
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedHealthy Adults | Healthy Volunteers OnlyGreece
Clinical Trials on "hard shoes" runners evaluation
-
Luxembourg Institute of HealthDECATHLON SACompletedRunning-Related Injury (First-time)Luxembourg